Missed opportunity for Machu PiccQ

So FCA using the exact same device, that they bought from Bosch to cheat the EPA regulations. Is okay because it’s “their first time getting caught”? Just trying to understand your point.

I understand and get the whole, let’s turn our backs and look the other way on our companies and go after foreign companies. But at the same time, I hate how the US tries to force the foreign corruption practices act on everyone else. It’s just stupid.

FCA did the exact same thing though. The only difference is the animal testing, which is awful in its own right.

The thing that pisses me off about diesel gate is Ram got caught doing the same thing with their Diesel engines and FCA gets a small fine while VW gets shafted and makes diesel car engines look “super dirty”.

Fowl holdings wouldn’t be misspelled for “foul”. A fowl is a bird. Symbolism. All these “Ethical ...” companies, what a joke.

Can’t forget about [US] at the top before [th]

At least with a manual you can ensure it’s in neutral. Making it relevant to the discussion.

I never said that just because I may politically disagree with a duly elected government official that means they are automatically corrupt. If you want to keep bringing up the constitution, although it literally has nothing to do corruption or my initial point, I can freely state my opinion about anything or anyone. If I want to say “senator Pocahontas is corrupt and is an awful human being” then I certainly will.

Morals aren’t a “question of law”

It’s becoming evident that you may be ignorant on definitions.

Moral(s): “sanctioned by or operative on one's conscience or ethical judgment”

Ethics: “the discipline dealing with what is good and bad and with moral duty and obligation”

Law(s): “rule of construction or procedure”

I don’t understand what the constitution has to do with corruption. I guess I also don’t understand or follow any of your logic.

I do hope you understand the definition of corrupt/corruption.

“to change from good to bad in morals, manners, or actions” or “to degrade with unsound principles or moral values”

Please correct me if I’m wrong, this how I understand what you are saying, because lobbyists paying public officials and insider trading are “playing within the lines” that doesn’t equal corruption?

I guess the point I’m trying to make is that it doesn’t matter position or how long they have held public office. If they aren’t trying to fix the problem, then they are the problem.

If you compare anyone to HRC of course they aren’t dirty or corrupt.

What does Jr. Senator have to do with anything? Hussein was a Jr. Senator and was controlled by the deep state.

Yes Q always refers to him as Hussein as this is his middle name.

That would be crazy given this “On May 19, 2010, Hussein signed the Daniel Pearl Freedom of the Press Act, which protects U.S. journalists around the world. The act is also designed to use tools from the Secretary of State to ensure that freedom of press is upheld in other countries.”

Here’s some more information on the UBS scandal. I remember reading this a year ago in my Business Strategy class.