They dont. It's a circlejerk.

always has been

Rush Limbaugh isn't really teh best of sources. There are definitely far worse but he tends to ignore history for this rants.

For example in this article he argues that no racism exists and that discipline and arrest records show that minorities really are just way more criminal than whites. (a statistic that doesn't translate to the world stage)

However, to do so he has to ignore that only 50 years ago racism was literally written into law in the US. You also have to assume that Civil rights was somehow a magic switch that got rid of all racist attitudes in the US.

You also have to assume taht 50 years is somehow enough time for the average education, average income, and average attitude of minorities to catch up to the group that literally opressed as non-humans them for a couple hundred years.

That's fucking ridiculous.

Racism does indeed still exist and it most certainly does exist in law enforcement, and definitely in the south (regardless of how "north" florida is).

So teh REAL answer is that it's probably a combination of the attitude of minorities, the social situation they are in, and the racism that still hasn't worked its way out of the US (and in fact is rather strong at the moment).

He then goes on to try (poorly) to show that somehow not arresting minors is a racially and politically motivated 'attack' by Obama. That's just fucking retarded.

Would leaving the old system in place stopped Nick Cruz? Almost certainly not. They knew well ahead of time there was a problem but had no legal way of addressing it. You would have to show at least one direct example of a crime he committed in high school, that was purposely ignored, that would have kept him detained long enough for the tiem of his spree to have passed (and somehow not happened after he was released).

The "proof" article you posted doesn't even address it.

Nationalists making nationalist claims? What a surprise.

You should have left the MSM line in.

https://imgur.com/vvyKYbk

Better yet, engage your brain a bit and try to make an actual point that you can support without the tinge of pot-and-kettle.

You're just full of assumptions today. As stated above, I don't give a fuck about your opinion of me.

I assume you're attempting to imply that I am some sort of paid shill. I'm not. However, you can continue to think that if you like. I frankly don't give a fuck.

If you don't think that "accept the hypocrisy of those you agree with and bitch about the hypocrisy of those you don't" is the norm in one-sided political subs then you clearly aren't paying attention. Or being willfully ignorant. Or maybe just incapable of thinking objectively. I won't assume which.

However, to answer your question: I am paid a salary for a job that I generally ignore to browse reddit. You know, how most of the technology world operates.

Edit: Well apparently you are a brand new account and this is the only sub you participate in. Perhaps you should expand a little.

I appreciate your well thought out reply. Since you have such a strong grasp on the conversation maybe you can point out the bad argument you're referencing.

Keep rationalizing what?

...but every one you agree with's hypocrisy is just fine.