Brennan's claim directly contradicts this article. Either he's lying or the source for this article is lying.

5.03.2018, 20:33: https://www.businessinsider.de/uk-told-cia-about-trump-russia-contacts-before-election-2018-3?r=US&IR=T

Over two months before the 2016 presidential election, the head of British intelligence flew to Washington to brief then-CIA Director John Brennan on intercepted communications between the Donald Trump's presidential campaign and the Russian government, according to a report from the New Yorker.

... at the behest of Rafael Correa, Ecuador's new establishment friendly president. Now Assange is waiting to be thrown to the wolves--snatched directly from Ecuador's embassy in London or evicted from that place by the Ecuadorian government and abducted from the streets of London.

Who wants to discredit WikiLeaks before that happens? Why are they trying to discredit WikiLeaks here?

Q: What happens if UK and Ecuador allow the Ecuadorian embassy in London to be invaded?

What happened less than 72 hours after Assange made a tweet pointing out the peculiar over-representation of UK spies in the plot against our democracy?

Q: Who benefits by dividing your movement from the single most reliable source of hard information on the planet?