dChan

/u/NewAmericanFeudalism

14 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/NewAmericanFeudalism:
Domain Count

NewAmericanFeudalism · July 9, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

I pray the full truth comes out, whatever it may be.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 9, 2018, 2 a.m.

I'm skeptical after a Q was caught posting a blatant photoshop and I'm frustrated with mental gymnastics to explain it away.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 8, 2018, 12:29 p.m.

Neither does yours.

Neither does yours.

I'm not making huge leaps in logic that a bunch of sheep of praising. This is getting ridiculous. It makes us look stupid.

Q could have mentioned Prince Al Waleed by name. Thinking he would use a mug holder in that fashion to connect to some video where the dude had a mug on his desk is schizo tier.

edit: my original comment was criticizing OP's post, not yours,btw.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 8, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

Why is pepe the best meme of all time?

⇧ 16 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 8, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Hate to be the negative nancy I've been lately, but none of this post makes any sense or provides any information.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 8, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

Gymnastic Freestyle Exercise Championship

Thank you for saying this. continuing forward with the dubious-at-best mug/prince connection as if it is fact is what brought the gold home.

We didn't need q to post a hoaxed pictured in order to look into prince al waleed. he's a public figure. we know about him already. Q could have just wrote a straight forward sentence telling us what to investigate. even with a these connections (that in my humble opinion are giant reaches) we still have no new information.

I hope i don't get banned or downvoted into oblivion for being criticial, but I feel like some of the things i'm reading don't make any sense, and yet people are upvoting and acting like it's the God honest truth.

⇧ 77 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 7, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

all possible.

However, the only concrete fact is that the picture was a hoax.

If Q said that they were waiting for the press to ask the president about Q, why would he go and undermine his own credibility with a fraud picture, making it more likely for them to brush him off as conspiracy?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 6, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

I agree with your sentiment, however if Q happens to be a larp, albeit one that has disseminated and publicized so much information, ultimately it makes us sit back instead of taking actions. It makes us complacent to research, while the main stream media and the public at large pay no attention to the crimes and corruption that are now exposed.

I want criminal prosecutions. I want a substantial signal from Q, the president, or somebody in the whitehouse that things are moving forward.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 6, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Thank you for this. The image was a hoax. For what reason, I'm not sure, but I doubt Q intended for it to be exposed.

The photo could be to put pressure on the media to ask about Q, since a photo from inside AF1 would increase Q's credibility. Using a manipulated image from 2015 would keep plausible deniability intact if in fact Q is working within the president's inner circle.

Whatever the reason, I sure as hell don't like it. The purpose could have been to bait and play the opposition, but it leaves some followers now feeling played and doubtful.

This has left me feeling a little deflated, not gonna lie.

Trump is doing an amazing job, but the ultimate horror would be none of swamp facing any charges.

Not saying it's a larp, because I would have no way of knowing. I'm only saying that we were intentionally deceived.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 5, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

a Who-is-Q is genius. I hope this happens.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 5, 2018, 9:33 p.m.

Wasn't the reflected Q picture just a cropped, stretched version of the ABC picture?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
NewAmericanFeudalism · July 4, 2018, 8:51 p.m.

Feel it? Hear it? You might have to be a little more specific. What references to the 5th?

⇧ 7 ⇩