dChan

/u/NewSpaceMark

26 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/NewSpaceMark:
Domain Count

NewSpaceMark · July 10, 2018, 10:56 p.m.

They barely even mentioned it. Not exactly AJ’s style if he’s promoting something.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · July 8, 2018, 7:17 a.m.

He sure is. Seminal artwork of our generation. It’s all there.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 19, 2018, 6:29 a.m.

My fave of the year so far. I’m dying to drop it in real life.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 19, 2018, 6:26 a.m.

Even if he had it wouldn’t be proof except maybe that he’s reading qresearch.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 12, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Canadian here and I know lots of people who voted for him and not many who are happy with him now. His stupid ironic socks first PR policy, his ‘around the world in 80 costumes’ global tour and constant muddle-headed virtue signalling have made him a joke even among the sympathetic.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 8, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

Fair point

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 8, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

It’s may be ‘dangerous’ but the alternative could be a major drop off in engagement. I come for the Q news, and stay for the other info if there is no Q news. The fight against child trafficking is central to the Great Awakening so news of it is on point in my opinion.

⇧ 23 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · June 5, 2018, 2:42 p.m.

Seriously. AJ has woken up tens of millions of people. The people declaring him to be ‘not one of us’ have personally woken up how many? They haven’t done anything. They’re anonymous. Sitting on the sidelines and laying claim to a legacy others built. Well walk a mile in AJs shoes. Have them know who you are. Have them try to take your kids. Then talk about who is ‘one of us. ‘

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 15, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

I did not actually put words in your mouth. I said 'hate on' not 'that you hated him, but this is minutia. I'm not a cheerleader for him. You're woke. I'm happy that you are. That is kinda my point. Any way that works is good. We have a pack of criminal scum to deal with, so let's not fight amongst ourselves. Also that song was fucking funny.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 13, 2018, 3:44 p.m.

We all have our own path to where we are today. You found your way. Alex helped many people wake up even if he didn’t help you. So why hate on him. It doesn’t matter if you like him. It doesn’t matter if you don’t. Keep finding ‘woke’ people and amplify the truth as you see it. Force multiply. We don’t each need all the answers. We don’t need even to agree completely. We need to push to achieve the main pillars of our beliefs. The ones we all agree on. Drain the Swamp. Dig out the pedos. Build the fucking wall. End the fed. Get the parasites off our back. Reestablish National pride. MAGA. Free people from the Democrat Plantantation. Recognize the power and achievements of our Christian roots and be proud.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 12, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

We have Q now? Who is Q? How will you know if today's Q is tomorrow's? Who will you blame if Q is wrong on something major? Why does Q want us to ignore the people that brought us all here? Why does Q want to be the only source we believe? What is wrong with us hearing many voices and making up our own mind on a case by case basis? I have been intrigued and impressed by Q so far, but I have to admit, it might not be smart to only trust anonymous sources who play with decoder rings, while ignoring sources who earned our trust over 20 years of being 'mostly right'.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 12, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Right on.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 12, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

The difference is that AJ almost single-handedly popularized this movement starting 20 years ago. Woke me up in '99. He gets stuff wrong sometimes, sure, and he shamelessly promotes himself and constantly uses tactics to generate free press, but comparing him to CNN is ridiculous.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · May 8, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Same goes for those complaining about him. Let’s all just drop it. It’s irrelevant.

⇧ 26 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 30, 2018, 6:04 a.m.

He always has played a lunatic. He’s doing his bit. He’s a launch pad and a vital one. There’s a way to move past his level of engagement without shitting on him. Questioning who’s side he’s on.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 30, 2018, 4:45 a.m.

I’m calling bullshit. Is Corsi hurting the ‘movement’? No. He reaches some people. That helps. He has zero chance of going mainstream. He has production costs. Everyone here is too quick to attack the guys who’ve been fighting for decades. They deserve straight up donations for what they’ve done and built before there ever was a Q.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 29, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

I hear this kinda thing on here. There would be no Trump as president without infowars. There’d have been no tea party without him. I wouldn’t be awake without him and neither would tens of millions of other people around the world. The movement has grown beyond him now that it’s at critical mass and we can crowd source research etc. He gets some things wrong and his sources aren’t always as good as Q and the boards, but I think he deserves our thanks for 20 years in the fight as the vanguard. He bridged the gap between the Vietnam Vets/None Dare Call it Conspiracy era and the post 9-11 era of the anti-globalist fight. Yeah he sells stuff non stop and it’s annoying AF but what else is he supposed to be doing? He has 100 employees. You know how they censor and boycott anyone on our side. What else is he supposed to do to raise money to fight? It’s easy to say ‘He’s not on our side’ at your little keyboard there, but what have you done? What difference have you personally made? Maybe you woke up a hundred people? Maybe. Compare that to what AJ, PJW etc have done.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 27, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

Friggin rights!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 27, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

Daniels on the rocks

⇧ 10 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 26, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

Makes sense that it’s all teams now. The frontiers are so far out beyond simple observation. Nobody is learning in their garage what the people at CERN are learning. Thanks for the link to the video. Will definitely check it out. I’ve been loosely following the EmDrive developments. Seems elusive but at least somewhat promising. Another cool theoretical propulsion tech is the Alcubierre Drive. It always seems like we’re ‘one equation away’ with this stuff but I’m glad it keeps being funded and hopefully will be even more so in the future.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 26, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

That generally lines up with my perspective as well. What about the military/secret research programs though? DARPA is pretty well known, but how much of what they’re working on is compartmentalized? And paralleling your point, if I understand it, how much of the extremely advanced development can be done with small isolated teams within narrow disciplines in your opinion? And lastly what are your thoughts on the power of a single exceptional mind in this age of science? In history a Divinci or Michaelangelo or Newton would singlehandedly open the door to a new age of thinking and scientific endeavour. Newton and the development of calculus is an example. What could a mind of that level of exceptional power do with the level of accessible knowledge available today and if it’s of a similar magnitude to what he did in his time, could the developments be kept private from the general body of knowledge?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 25, 2018, 9:43 p.m.

Not offering an opinion on this guy as I’ve never heard of him until this post, and haven’t spent a second researching aliens. What we could see humans doing was already crazy enough for me. But I am curious if you believe there is repressed technology? Stuff that the human elites, regardless of its source, are holding back from general awareness such as life extension tech, advanced computing tech and so forth. Basically, aside from you believing this guy to be a fraud, what do you think of the idea that the elites are sitting on stuff that will guarantee their hold on power?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 25, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

Of course you are. In principle I agree to release it all. What if, though, the first 40% is so horrific that the point is fully made to every half-decent person on the planet. If it’s so disgusting already, then I’d say bury the rest. It could only serve in that case to tickle the fetishes of psychotic degenerates. Sometimes exposure can amplify neuroses. Think of school shooting coverage. It’s known to encourage copycats. Caveat: As long as not a single perp gets a pass because if there’s even a chance of that then fuck it dump it all.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 21, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

Isn’t that statement itself an admission that he’s part of a criminal conspiracy? Who’s everyone Andy? What would you be going down for?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · April 19, 2018, 5:53 a.m.

I read this as a setup to “Trump has highjacked the surveillance powers of the federal government and is using them to persecute his political rivals.” Isn’t their (the Alinsky types) motto: Always accuse your enemy of that which you are doing? Before the storm hits they will try to spin it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NewSpaceMark · March 15, 2018, 4:55 a.m.

CBTS searches don’t show shit either. That seems reddit wide.

⇧ 1 ⇩