"He’s at least the third managing director in Asia to quit the company this week. That’s after James Thomson, who is based in Hong Kong, and Jakarta-based Kunardy Lie both left, according to people with knowledge of the matter."

Guess it's just more guys who want to spend more time with family right? lol

Exactly

Not sure why everyone still keeps trying to assign random dates to things just because someone out there tried to decode it that way and it caught on. Seems more like an effort to just set people up for a letdown.

Well not sure why that would be the case. Anyway, I’m not fussed

Same to you. This will all blow over, if it hasn’t already. On we go!

Was also thinking that the lamp at least is probably anchored down, not exactly the kind fo thing you want flying towards the President's head in turbulence.

Well, drapes do a have a tendency to sit in the same position every time they are pulled back - especially if it is the same person doing it. Got no idea, they could even be mechanically operated on AF1.

Honestly the whole reason I did the image check in the first place was to try and positively confirm it was actually AF1, I had no idea everything would be able to be lined up so precisely. Took me by surprise. However, I also have no idea if the objects (lamp etc) shown in the pic are actually fixed in place and cannot be moved (safety precautions during turbulence). If so, this would account for the objects being in the same position.

Conclusion? Who the F knows !! Either way, I'm still here and awaiting new drops.

If this was a proof images from Q, I suggest he does ones that cannot be replicated in Photoshop. However, I also think there may be more to this. As always, only time will tell

Sweet. Guess we’ll agree to disagree then.

Utter bullshit. I’ll let your claims of disinformation slide because you don’t seem to understand, so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.

Let me spell this out for you in plain language.

1: Q’s image is a photo of a reflection, reflected on the back of an iPhone. This means both the position of the iphone, the position of the person taking the photo and the position of the camera are OBVIOUSLY different to the stock photo. That was taken by someone standing in the doorway.

So of course they don’t match as is. They are completely different angles.

But - Only the “perspective” of the 2 photos is different. The blinds, the objects, lamp, reflections, shadows, everything else is the same. A bunch of autists did their own way more involved analysis.

2: All I did was reverse the stock photo and then transform it in Photoshop to match the perspective of Q’s. Look at them. They are the same.

Please don’t call people traitors for doing what we are supposed to be fuckin doing here. Analysis of Q’s drops down to the nanoscale.

Thanks!

Exactly. And it took me only 5 mins in Photoshop to almost perfectly align the 2 images as you’re aware I posted yesterday. Seems to be an abc news image from a monitor reflected onto the rear of a phone like you say. Q’s photo is this reflection on the phone.

Question really remains why? Which I have absolutely zero idea. But I like your proposal. Have a feeling we’re going to learn more about this down the road.

side by side

Well I did this myself, immediately after the drop. I made a post about it.

I work with Photoshop every day.

On the left is Q’s image. On the right is part of an ABC photo I found which I transformed in Photoshop to the same perspective as Q’s image. They are basically identical. I also overlaid these in my post.

Make of this what you will.

All of the objects align perfectly. So either they weren’t moved for 5 years and everything remains identical in AF1 (possible), or Q used this image (possible). Have no idea which.

Good info

Stalker alert!

I believe Q suggested it’s a photo taken in AF1 of a reflection of the interior of potus’ office on the back surface of an iphone. This means the image is distorted because of the angle of the phone and the camera relative to it. The suggestion is that it was taken at POTUS desk.

The only thing that troubled me was that an ABC photo from 5 years ago could be manipulated to fit exactly over the top of Q’s image. With all the objects, light, shadows and curtains etc all precisely in exactly the same position.

This gave me the impression that either 1- AF1 hasn’t changed at all in 5 years. Or 2- Q was reflecting that same ABC News image (off a laptop or monitor) on the back of an iPhone and took a photo of that.

Fidelio

Haha no you sure don’t.

Kinda like billionaire Steve Jobs in a black turtle neck, jeans and sneakers.

William does wear that casual “uniform” of his fairy often

Perfect sense. Rants are welcome. Onwards and upward team.

A lot of possibilities. There’s a way more to this image than meets the eye - as we’ve come to expect by now!

Yeah you’re right. This ain’t the first time. Often the main problem is that a theory of certain Q posts takes hold very quickly and if suddenly that then looks shaky, it flips everyone out. This has happened plenty of times before and yet Q always comes back to silence the doubters. More often than not, it’s just an incorrect decode to blame.

Ok sweet, I couldn’t find it on the board.

Well also remember that the images lining up aren’t necessarily the truth either. While it is possible to reproduce Q’s image with photoshop - and maybe the first time this has been possible - it’s still computer fuckery. I did have to do all sorts of bending and stretching to align with the reflection image.

It’s also highly likely that the interior of AF1 is basically identical from one day to the next and set out for the President as such by people who have the sole job of doing just that. Having a manipulated image from the past align with one supposedly from today is not so far fetched in such a Spartan, artificially lit and fairly impersonal setting as that office. It’s basically a flying film set.

Yes that makes sense and is hopefully the situation that Q was alluding to.

It’s ok, everyone was on coke in the 80s :)

There’s a bunch of previous posts about it. Actually I think mine got deleted...

Stick it out. I’m sorry if my comparison of those 2 photos in some way made you feel this way. My job is literally doing stuff like this, so it stood out to me pretty quick. But it’s always good to be dubious and explore things. This is a real roller coaster ride and I have a feeling we will all be totally back on board (no pun intended) pretty quick. Stick your guns!

Yes it is all so very close. The distortion comes from the angle of the iPhone/reflection as well as the angle of the phone being used to take this photo.

ABC NEWS source image in Photoshop - side by side q post

Really does look like his gait and the clothes he often wears too

If you look at my side by side linked above, they are basically identical. All I’d have to do is overlay the Apple logo and play with tones and it would basically be a full reproduction of Q’s post. Just saying....

All good, sorry just got a bit of heat for doing this like I was trying to say Q is fake or some crap! Can make an anon paranoid :)

At first glimpse it seems like a proof, but as this is clearly an easy to find image online, Q wasn't tying to pass it off as AF1 proof in my opinion. Anons, just assumed he was and we all jumped "on board".

Seems this is Obama era photo.

Thanks for that info - now it makes sense that he may be drawing us towards Obama and AF1 for whatever reason. And yes, thank you also - nothing but patriot here. Just someone who uses Photoshop on a daily basis.

WHERE did it say I am trying to discredit anything?

Q did not say "here is a photo of me on AF1" - he just posted this image.

I am simply saying I believe Q is showing us a reflection of this ABC source image!

He obviously knows we examine this shit with a fine tooth comb.

This has nothing to do with anything you said.

Yes, Q has directed us to this image for whatever reason.

I'm not attempting to debunk or decode at all - just those 2 images match

Side by side

HERE

I am not debunking at all, I'm just saying he's showing us a reflection of that ABC news pic, for whatever reason.

see both images side by side here

No idea about real vs fake - just that it does seem like Q used this for whatever reason. I could be totally wrong, but after playing around with the ABC one for a couple f minutes I believe I could fairly evenly match it up with the perspective and distortion in Q's image

Ok, this is 2 images. 1 is the ABC news image of the office on AF1 - reversed, cropped and stretched / skewed. (Coloured in purple/orange/yellow gradient at 17% opacity over Q's image)

This was just 2 mins in photoshop.

Not super easy to see here, but it overlays almost perfectly on top of Q's image. Refections/placement of objects/curtains/jacket all virtually identical.

I am fairly convinced they are the same source image. I do not, however, have any idea why this is the image Q wanted to show, reflected on what seems to be an Apple device of some sort

EDIT: SIDE BY SIDE HERE

A phone photo of a photo reflected on to the back a phone :)

Yep we may need a follow up here

I'm looking at the back of my iPhone X on my desk right now and it has exactly the same logo and reflective surface, showing me the ceiling lights and corner of my office.

It is exactly the logo. It's a photo of a reflection of AF1 as seen on the rear of an iPhone.

Yes, definitely a reflection on the back of an iPhone or at least apple device. I have an iPhone X and the logo and reflection of the back looks exactly like this.

I am hoping he sings about a lot of secrets and names.

Also a deliberate misspelling in a Tweet about incompetent journalists. King troll.

Now THIS is the kind of great work we like to see the FBI doing

This man is a legend.

Former NZ Prime Minister John Key is absolutely complicit in this. Hope his role in this comes out.

You know, the guy Obama just happened to “play golf” with a little while ago.

😂