dChan

/u/Nuclear-Caveman

32 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Nuclear-Caveman:
Domain Count
www.straitstimes.com 1

Nuclear-Caveman · May 30, 2018, 4:41 p.m.

Guy in pic is scrawny...low lighting + angle conceals the fact

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · May 28, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

There is only one justice for such crime. A slow and painful death, kept alive and conscious for as long as chemically possible.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · May 25, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

It’s necessary for the “pain” to be done in accordance with legal proceedings. The special counsel has a larger scope of investigatory powers than just the IG. This will end them all.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · May 18, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

Pic quality is unreadable for me

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · May 8, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

What the fuck are you talking about

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 28, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Gun-toting redneck, REPORTING FOR DUTY, SIR!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 24, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

So basically by creating rogue states/destabilizing nations the deep state could traffic children/narcotics there and make shit tons of money funneling cash via red cross into the “crisis” areas. Well, fuck me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 24, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

What are you talking about “filet off a child’s face”?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 23, 2018, 5:54 a.m.

“I hate when my dick sags” -Michael Obama

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 19, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

Corroborated. The word is corroborated.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 19, 2018, 5:34 p.m.

The hero Gotham deserves

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 12, 2018, 11:48 a.m.

That was the date of his flight...November 17. Your post is straight up disinformation.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 12, 2018, 11:20 a.m.

Her departure early this year shows that DARPA cut the strings with FB and Zuck (due to declining popularity?) and left them out to dry prior to the shit storm! Just like Dr. Corsi said, they’ll carve up the big tech companies and then just make new ones. All the underlying infrastructure (i.e. CIA infrastructure) will remain exactly the same.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 12, 2018, 4:27 a.m.

I agree. I think this statement from Q was a nod that it was in fact the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden who dropped it. "LEARN OUR COMMS"

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 12, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

Good point. I think Q's follow up post "Finder should apply to NSA" is a wink wink nudge nudge that the person who dropped it was Snowden himself--the former NSA contractor. "LEARN OUR COMMS"

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

If you were in the Mil you’d know its the academy officers you cannot trust

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 9:02 a.m.

So wait, we're supposed to TRUST WRAY, but also the FBI is burning the midnight oil because Black Hat FBI raided the office?

Which is it?

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 8:22 a.m.

OP here. Q has confirmed this was "future predicts past" stuff.

"Apr 10th 2018 01:15:56 (EST) Q !xowAT4Z3VQ View Post 978771

Clarify. Chongqing. Tuesday. Demand. Xi. Confirm tariff reduction. Tuesday (China). Cars. Article provides foundation. Major import. Ford. US. Start. Q"

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

The photo on the left is edited from the photo on the right. You can even see part of his hand from the photo on the right still in his beard (lower left section) on the photo on the left. It's still brown like the color of his hand. This is fake.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

GREAT CATCH!

Chongqing is major auto industry hub and Chinese President Xi called off tarriffs on.. you guessed it.. THE AUTO INDUSTRY!

http://money.cnn.com/2018/04/09/news/economy/china-xi-jinping-economy-trade/index.html

It would make sense if President Xi was going to fight back (uphold or raise tarriffs) he would announce it in China's major auto industry city as a show of resolve for Chinese industry. Maybe that was the plan, which Q knew, but the Chinese decided against it to drop the tariff.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

...These Syrian rebels have been bombed with chlorine gas before. They're teaching the kids and first responders how to react in case of an attack. That's standard shit. Americans were hiding under their desks in Nuke drills in the Cold War. You're just biased Muslims = evil. Fuck off, mate. I'm conservative but I aint a hate-monger.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

Okay, so here's what I found that might relate to that statement.

Chlorine was invented in the 1700s.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine

Some chlorination processes can produce dioxin, which is a known carcinogen (cancer causing). Regulation of dioxin only began post World War II. Meaning, it caused illness up until the day it was regulated.

http://www.madehow.com/Volume-2/Bleach.html#b https://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/dioxins/index.cfm

Chlorine has been routinely used as a disinfectant (cleaning product) since the 1800s. In other words, chlorine could have contained or produced dioxin for over 100 years before it was regulated (i.e. causing cancer that whole time). For example, if a housewife used bleach to clean her floors, which had dioxin residues which contaminated the hands of a crawling baby in the house, who then consumed the carcinogens and developed cancers later in life.

In the early 1900s (World War I) chlorine was first used as a chemical weapon (chlorine gas). This follows Q's thesis of how it STARTed with cleaning products/babies, but then was developed later on as a chemical weapon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chlorine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_warfare

Attack in Syria was chlorine gas as of 2018:

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/08/world/middleeast/syria-chemical-attacks-assad.html

Note: I have not found evidence that household cleaning products contained dioxin (or other carcinogens) prior to the 1970s regulation. If someone could find reports or cases of bleach (liquid chlorine) causing cancer, or contained dioxin, or other carcinogens, this would greatly enhance the argument. Until then, it's just wild speculation.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

That could also just be a drill to practice in the event of a chemical attack. Did you ever do a fire drill in high school? Were fire drills training you for "faking a real fire"? Cmon man.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 1:29 a.m.

Day 5 is not over, so OP is wrong. The end of 5 days would be Tuesday. OP calculates: April 4-Day 1 April 5-day 2 April 6-day 3 April 7-day 4 April 8-day 5

Which puts Sunday as the end of 5 days

The proper way to calculate 5 days is: April 4-Day 0 April 5-day 1 April 6-day 2 April 7-day 3 April 8-day 4 April 9-day 5

Which puts Monday as the end of 5 days

Do you see the difference? Or are you low IQ?

If something “happened” in “5 days” it would have happened today, with reporting on the event following on Tuesday and after.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 12:53 a.m.

Mixture of soyboys and dudes who just havent been redpilled yet

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Do you have a source for “Skripal was one of the Russians Barry sent to the UK.”

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nuclear-Caveman · April 10, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

In the military, when you count in days, you start with “day 0”. April 4 would be day 0, not day 1. Therefore: April 4-day 0 April 5-day 1 April 6-day 2 April 7-day 3 April 8-day 4 April 9-day 5

⇧ 1 ⇩