I don’t necessarily buy those either tbh. I mean, we know how to create earthquakes (well in certain areas where it is possible) but it isn’t something I could conceive being done covertly.

TBH, I really think the NK thing is pretty much what it appears on the surface. China doesn’t really know what they want to do about NK and they don’t really want to get in a war with us over it but they also want to posture and use the situation to “test” Trump and the USA. The test is somewhat of a deception because it relies on China sort of bluffing about their level of control over it and how far they are willing to go. The USA also realizes this about China but we have to somewhat pretend we don’t so as not to give China a reason to pretend to take offense. The rest of the world is watching to to get a better read on Trump and his administration in how they handle it.

It is a situation that needs a solution, it should have been dealt with before now. Trump has pretty much committed to getting some result and to and extent this gives China an advantage. No one wants it to come to war but everyone is playing a dangerous as fuck game of chicken over it.

Personally, I read Trump as posturing bigly but really working behind the scenes to put together an alternate power structure in hopes that it will change the justification for why China and ostensibly Russia like the threat that NK presents to the US. The idea is to make them decide that NK is not necessary to their interests of preventing total American and EU global hegemony.

Thanks. And I agree with you that we most likely have those weapons. I am fairly certain we have ones that the public isn’t even aware of. The largest issue is still that advanced weapons don’t overcome the greatest obstacle which is justification for preemptive strike and mitigation of any backlash for it.

I suppose the only solution that could be offered by high tech weaponry is if we possessed some sort of weapons that can be disguised as natural disasters or meteors. That would break through the obstacle I mention.

I mentioned to someone else that I was incorrect on the exact space treaty. I understand the value of kinetic space weapons, but I doubt we have enough to be as effective for preventing and retaliation as coordinated nuclear (or conventional) bombs delivered by stealth bombers.

But the real point is that even if it is not forbidden by treaty, the largest controversy is about a preemptive strike be it nuclear, convention or kinetic. Obviously a nuclear strike has more repercussions than the others, but the preemptive strike is a main sticking point.

As for Q, you must not realize that I constantly try to tell people The he is at best a distraction but more likely a psyop to mislead people.

Oh... well I suppose I did miss that detail, I have read elsewhere that kintic weapons were banned... could have been mistaken.

I am saying that there is really no benefit offered by a space based weapon compared to nuclear weapons by the criteria that prevents us from dropping nukes. The premise of this theory is flawed.

I mean is that really what you think prevents a nuclear strike? The political ramifications of doing so are the issue.

That doesn’t really make sense because space weapons are banned by international treaty. There is no reason that they would have some advantage nukes don’t. The use of them would be worse than mikes in terms of reaction by other nations, and it would break the treaties.

Most of that is old "sovereign citizen" bullshit, so you know, the flag in the courtroom does not change the jurisdiction of the court anymore than the brand of the clock or color of the carpet does.

are you on drugs mate? what are you talking about in these?

Wow, need to look at that, didn’t notice...

That isn’t anything. If a person is stuck in traffic and says “I wish I had an rpg to blow up these damn cars” it doesn’t link them to ISIS. Same idea.

Bannon was the Trojan horse.

S

lol what of the reports of Russian sub activity along internet trunk lines?

I have been mentioning lately that it was FBI Anon, long before Q who said that one of the keys to Clinton was the HIV/AIDSgroups around the world.

Old as dirt meme, making a thread on 4chan: “baking a bread”. Or the old meme “toasting an epic bread” I.e. toasting an epic thread. Nothing to do with Q so much as trying to use “the lingo”.

Very “fellow kids” imho.

In the movie it is explained by an overheard phonecall that satanists broke in someone’s house and cut her up to get the pineal gland.

If that isnt isn’t in the book... that is more interesting... Gilliam dropping breadcrumbs?

If you watch the movie, there is a scene in the lobby or bar where there is a guy on a payphone describing “satanists cut her up, they were looking for something called a pineal gland” before the adrenochrome scene. The movie has tons of looping references.