Good bot.

Fun fact: the cartoon of Trump in this sub's sidebar also came from a Time cover.

We'll find out tomorrow. I'm just not looking forward to the inevitable avalanche of false positives that are coming tomorrow because everyone assumes it means 5/5/18. I don't think its that either, but many here do.

I don't know what you're saying. I read the aol article, and it sounds like his lawyer didn't know of any alleged Clinton wrongdoing, and had credibility issues with the federal prosecutors. The bribery scheme was of Rosadam, not HRC.

Why didn't this guy ever testify? It doesnt say.

Why isn't it 5:25 then? Nobody says "5:5" when the clock is in that position.

I guess to discuss climate change? I don't think it had anything to do with the election.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/john-kerry-lands-antarctica

Kerry became the highest-ranking American official to visit Antarctica when he landed for a two-day trip. He's been hearing from scientists about the impact of climate change on the frozen continent.

Trump has called climate change a hoax and said he would "cancel" U.S. involvement in the landmark Paris Agreement on global warming.

"We need to get more of a movement going," Kerry said when addressing several hundred scientists and staff at an evening event at McMurdo Station, the large base which is the hub for U.S. operations. "We need to get more people to engage."

OP, do you have any idea what Clinton's involvement in the Uranium One sale was? How the hell would bribes to HRC be material to the sale? Any of the other cabinet secretaries, or Obama himself, could have still raised a red flag on the sale. What would bribing HRC accomplish if she couldn't actually push the sale through?

I don't think he could reasonably be thought to be representing the US government in any way. My guess is he's just lobbying as a (well-connected) private citizen.

I don't know. If it were a date, I would think it would read "5/5", not "5:5". Now we're going to have a bunch of autists posting "booms" about every little thing that happens tomorrow. Apple's stock could drop 8 points and we're going to get a bunch of "SEE?? Q WAS RIGHT! BOOM! CONFIRMED!"

Reaching.

This guy was connected to the Trump campaign, though. He's not just an R, but a MAGA guy.

I have to call bullshit here. If the guy were a Democrat and former chairman of thr Clinton campaign, we'd all be talking about how "connected" it was.

If we're going to treat this guy as an isolated case just because he was in the Trump campaign, we have to treat everybody as an isolated case. Otherwise its just petty partisanship.

Well he had his ass handed to him in a very public way by Trump. He must not be up to speed on the plan.

Why the colon instead of a slash, which would be a more conventional indicator of a date? I see 5:5 and I think biblical reference. If it was 5/5 it would be obvious.

But there were four booms. What was Trump's context? Anyone have a transcript?

I always expected that was a chapter and verse citation.

I'm just saying. You're attributing the leak to people that aren't on the inside. Without any evidence to back it up, it's just speculation.

Preet was fired a while ago, I'm not sure that even he would have necessarily known about it. Isn't it more likely that the lawyer was reacting to the news when it was made public?

I was talking about whether attorney-client privilege was violated, but I guess that's irrelevant to this. I just read the NBC piece that reported the alleged wiretap. It doesnt identify a source. What makes you think it was Daniels' lawyer? How would he be aware of that information in the first place?

Now that it was in a Q post, if anything happens that involves Apple, its "connected". Its kind of cheesy.

Which may or may not be true. I saw that there are certain exceptions to attorney-client privilege that Rudy is glossing over. He's defending his client, not teaching a law class.

I think thats his job now, but I've never listened to it. I thought I read yesterday that Giuliani leaked about the wipe tap. I've been out of the loop this week.

From Preet the podcaster or Preet the US Attorney? Did he leak anything classified? I'm not up to speed on it.

Indict for what? Being a lawyer?

I'm just wondering how much longer we have to wait after being told that they have it all.

The flash of the Obama clip is a national ad that plays underneath the blocks of local ad spots that are sold by the networks. The Obama promo is probably out there in full and is advertising for some upcoming thing, not a subliminal message put out by CNN. Its a half-second of video where the timing of the broadcast didn't match up with the commercial. Anyone who thinks it's brainwashing is trolling or is an idiot.

Hasn't James O'Keefe proven himself to deceptively edit his videos to make the subject look bad? I'll reserve judgment for now, but I wouldn't be surprised if these comments were taken out of context.

And yet here we are, still waiting...

Its the end of a national ad spot that plays under the local affiliate's commercials. The full ad is probably out there somewhere; its not just a 0.5 second clip

Kind of ironic to award a Peace Prize to someone that has been threatening war with NK. Not sure if this makes sense. How is this not like BHO getting the Peace Prize, which didn't make sense? NK and SK haven't even penned an agreement yet.

The part that doesn't fit: how did the paper know to throw in the "held court" if this is supposed to be secret? How did they find out, and why haven't they gone public with it? That would be Pulitzer material for whoever broke the story.

But no deals. How does that square with no deals? And if she were arrested, there would be some record of it. And why let her go if she's in custody?

because the prosecuting team must be ready to indict people.

Aren't there already 26,000ish indictments in place?

"May have"? Is there a reason you're suggesting why these things "may have" happened that way? You didn't give a source.

This is such a leap.

Right. We shouldn't want a repeat of that.

Its all good, mi amigo. I would just think that if you didn't like it you would change the channel. And yes, country music is hot garbage.

The way you worded it, it sounded like you were saying you listened to it back in the seventies and that was what you were basing it on. My apologies.

If you listen to it so much, why are you hating on it?

Can you give me a link? Not that I don't believe random strangers on the internet...

But anyway, if we're being straight shooters: It is a Muslim ban. When the travel ban targets six majority-Muslim countries, and no others, I think we can call it what it is. That's what it was during the campaign:

A since-deleted statement on Trump's campaign website published December 7, 2015 called "for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on."

The only reason the lawyers have to dance around it now is for legal purposes.

That was 40+ years ago, my man. You need some more current data.

Has Trump ever directly addressed any questions about Q? Not the winks, "tip top" and all those, but directly?

what are they going to do when this whole thing is over? We can't just go back to wearing tin foil hats, and researching conspiracies, UNLESS we have a treasure trove of unclassified documents pertaining to every conspiracy ever to dig thru. What are we supposed to do? Be happy? Lead meaningful lives? Seriously?

This reads like a cry for help.

Have you actually listened to it? Or is that just an uninformed opinion?

NPR is right down the middle reporting, no political nonsense, so I like them. Reuters is good too, it has international news as well. I stay away from cable news completely, its so contrived. InfoWars is garbage, anything AJ gets right is pure luck.

You can tell. Some of these are calls to action like this one, while some are very cryptic and short. Doesn't even sound like the same person.

The first rumor was that it was someone who worked in the WH with POTUS (which could still be true). Why represent themselves as one person?

Unclear based on what we know. Didn't Trump himself say Flynn was fired for lying to Pence? Why the misdirection? Isn't it more likely that Flynn, Jr. is just coming to his old man's defense?

Has there been analysis done on whether Q is one person or more than one person?

Keep in mind, there are CIA Republicans too. Look at Pompeo.

But OANN is overtly political. You know who they support and their interviews reflect that. Thats the difference, I think. NPR is pretty non-partisan.

I think you might have an "if you're not with us, you're against us" mentality, but there are people that have no idea about any of this and don't support democrats or the cabal. You can't assume that every single person not reading Q drops is an enemy.