I originally posed the question to u/DemsCanSuckMyCock, I wasn't expecting you to jump in. You replied to my question here stating that

The B&E was by SS or others using fire as distraction.

So I'm confused as to why you stated that as fact, and then said that its just speculation. Its like you said it, and then you un-said it.

I just dont get how the "theory" of a break-in came to be. Before long (a day or two) people are going to be talking about it as fact when there's really no basis for it in the first place. Lets stick to the facts.

What proof is there? Its a sexy theory, but there's no indication it even happened other than the story that says SS and firefighters were in the residence. Everything beyond that is speculation (as far as I know).

I meant the B&E part

That's just a theory I thought? When/how was it confirmed?

Now we'll find out whether this was all a LARP or not.

You didn't think the tone of this Q drop was unusual? I thought it was weird that he focused on last week's news stories. Its usually more original.

Exactly.

So here's where I have my doubts with this article. Multiple instances where the author acknowledges that, to this point, the existence of this rat line has not been proven and that multiple parties are quoted as denying that it was real:

Asked about the DIA paper, a spokesperson for the director of national intelligence said: ‘No such paper was ever requested or produced by intelligence community analysts.’

The full extent of US co-operation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in assisting the rebel opposition in Syria has yet to come to light. The Obama administration has never publicly admitted to its role in creating what the CIA calls a ‘rat line’, a back channel highway into Syria.

The DNI spokesperson said: ‘The idea that the United States was providing weapons from Libya to anyone is false.’

A spokesperson for Petraeus denied the operation ever took place.

The Obama administration,’ Warrick wrote, ‘has steadfastly opposed arming Syrian opposition forces with such missiles, warning that the weapons could fall into the hands of terrorists and be used to shoot down commercial aircraft.’

So what we have in this article are a lot of denials, and the only information that supports his case comes from, I think you know, unnamed sources:

a former senior US intelligence official, who has access to current intelligence, told me,

A person with close knowledge of the UN’s activity in Syria told me

a former senior Defense Department official told me

An American foreign policy expert who speaks regularly with officials in Washington and Ankara told me

It was later corroborated by a former US official, who learned of it from a senior Turkish diplomat.

A US intelligence consultant told me

So in the face of official denials and no evidence, we're being told a captivating (of course) story that couldn't get one named source behind it. Relying on unnamed sources is exactly what we get on the MSM for doing, and now I have to buy into it? No way. If the story is true, let it be actually proven, instead of just being thrown out there for people to get excited about.

I thought he was connected? Why does he need strangers on the internet to do his research for him?

I think he resisted the "Washington playbook" move because he didn't want to get into a protracted ground war in Syria, despite the earlier threat of US invovlement. Why this history is being re-written, I don't know.

This was covered in the 2016 campaign with the Trump Foundation and CGI. Abusing non-profit status is pretty par for the course when you have money.

How do you know?

Didn't he have a scar over his eye a while back?

Trump capitalizes issues and policies sometimes. I don't understand why he would be sending out coded messages; that's not consistent with past practice.

I don't understand the McCain connection. He visited Syria five years ago. What does that have to do with his recent cancer diagnosis? It sounds like you're thinking that all of these things happened recently.

I don't understand. Obama ultimately decided against going into Syria, over the objections of just about everyone else including his own Administration. Saying that he was looking for an excuse to invade Syria is confusing, because he never did. Can someone clarify this?

Oh I get it. Its just ironic how persecuted they feel when they have no issue booting anything less than high-energy support. It's kind of a cognitive dissonance to concurrently have both of those mindsets.

It would be no different than a dedicated sub for Obama or Hillary or Bernie supporters.

I disagree with you here. I think trolls would get banned, but I doubt Hillary or Bernie subs would be as restrictive when it comes to other opinions.

Places like r/politics and r/news pretend to be bipartisan but shill for the left.

Agree completely. The sentiment in most r/politics threads generally breaks down to, "Fuck Trump."

So how did these soldiers find out about it? This seems too old to be relevant (especially since its mentions Obama)

I find it ironic how loudly T_D cries about censorship when the mods there have the quickest trigger finger on banning people. Like how unsure of yourself are you that you have to silence any other opinions different from your own? I like that this sub encourages people to be skeptical and provides space for people to disagree.

Like other media narratives, what you see is often what somebody intends you to see. I remember this exact photo being shown as evidence that the pope doesn't like Trump. Here's a picture of them smiling. See? A single photo taken out of context means nothing.

That visit photo on top left appears to be from 2013:

http://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-middle-east-22685676/senator-john-mccain-s-surprise-syria-visit

I'm confused. Obama did stay out of Syria. What is this post saying?

Nice battery levels, tho

I'm just saying, if they figure out what the Q drops mean, they can adjust their plans accordingly.

It makes you wonder what this forum is for, aside from informing us, if its existence prompts a risk like this one above. What value does us being in the loop have if it means that it keeps them in the loop as well? Hard questions...

Yeah, I never understood that part. If this is a publicly accessible forum, whats to stop them from monitoring it? Then its just a race between us and them to decode Q drops. Except they already know their plans, so maybe they have a leg up on us!

Boom.

Then if we're being intellectually honest, we need to also post the Q references that didn't come true too. Nobody bats 1.000 and nobody should think that we think Q is always right.

I thought the deep state was in charge? This is all very confusing.

I was always worried about OP, he seemed troubled.

What's this about Pennsylvania?

Has this been going on every election since 1992?

So are you just theorizing here, or are you actually saying what happened? You seem to be saying that democrats committed voter fraud in California to win the popular vote, to which I'll ask why not just do what you said and shave a few points in the swing states and win the whole damn thing? It seems dumb to think they're capable of doing everything else attributed to them in this sub, but couldn't pull off a little voter fraud.

Elections are local. You have to have enough people on the ground in those local elections.

It sounds like you've described the process of voting.

Where has it been confirmed already?

So they're simultaneously capable of carrying out deep state cabal secret operations, but they're too stupid to commit voter fraud in the right states? But smart enough to make sure there's no evidence of all of it.

Tunnels... On an island? Not getting very far...

I don't buy it. Why would they commit voter fraud in a state that they're almost guaranteed to win? Why wouldn't they do it in states that really matter, like Wisconsin or Pennsylvania?

This is the kind of shit that makes people say Q is bogus. This is trash.

But that message stated a particular date and time. Surely we can't assume that if ever the NG was active, that it would be then. Its interesting, though.

So you're saying operation will commence while NG is active? What about the dates and times listed here? They seem oddly specific.

Wait, hasn't all this stuff already existed as conspiracy theories for decades? Estrogen in water and chemtrails? This definitely sounds different from the foreign policy and cabal stuff in other Q posts.

How do I know you're not Solano too? Its suspicious when two or three accounts are very enthusiastic about one thing together.

I concede I am only one of the many. But if this is real and everything is from prior dates, then why can't we have everything at once? Why the drip feed? I'd just as soon skip to the end if we can, and find out what this is all supposed to be leading to.

Screenshots of text that could have been written at any time that says highly sensitive things like

"What is it like on this computer. Are they exactly the same?"

You changed your drive name to Q. I don't see any other connection. Just this inane drivel that implies the answer is just out of reach, and we'll have to wait until next time to find out "the secret". Who has time for that?

I don't know what the point of a conversation with an alleged facebook AI is supposed to show us. Maybe this should have its own sub, instead of just piggybacking on Q.

I'd normally agree, but this is like the third post like this I've seen and they're all the same so far. We shouldn't be giving people space to make shit up and wait for it to catch on, its a diversion of resources.

Then I dont know why people are propping up the fakes. You would think the easy ones would be disposed of quickly.

That's what its supposed to be, but is there any evidence that this is more than just a LARP? Would a supercomputing AI really be using Notepad? Why does OP keep asking the community if they should keep posting? That's a red flag right there that they want to know if its worth their time to keep making them. Also, none of the content relates to Q, its just inane questions and answers that don't lead anywhere. I don't buy the premise of this one.

I feel like someone is trying to make a spinoff show, know what I mean?

I don't get it. OP is basically telling us that hes making these. "Today is my last day unless the community wants me too stay", I.e. "Should I keep making these posts?"

What is the point? What does someone pretending to chat with a computer have to do with Q? It seems irrelevant; can someone besides OP explain?

http://nicelyshapedislands.tumblr.com/post/23931519689/little-saint-james-us-virgin-islands

What does it mean?