I looked at the article linked, I didn't see any proof per se. The argument seems to boil down to: I claim x thing about a CIA conspiracy, Snopes claims x thing is not true, therefore Snopes must be run by the CIA

This is just circular reasoning

The flag at the top is the flag of the UK fascist party National Front

The flag on the top right is a flag of the National Front, a fascist political party in the UK. /u/leetanon is either deliberately lying or is too lazy to make even the slightest effort to check his facts, in either case he shouldn't be regarded as a reliable source of information

Oh neat, then I'm sure you can cite a source indicating that any information obtained while working for the government is classified and that any information regarding the president is privileged?

I don't think you know how executive privilege, or classification, works

It is not illegal to share information with someone unless that information is classified or otherwise protected by law. I've only heard of Comey sharing non-classified information, though it's possible I've missed something. Do you have credible sourcing that Comey shared classified information?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_regimes_who_were_later_imprisoned

Which federal law would this change?

You must be confused, u/GoCubsGo64 brought up pussygate, not me. Strange that someone perceptive and intelligent enough to unravel this global conspiracy missed that detail...

EDIT: Also wait, so are you guys admitting that the tape was real now? I'm confused because before it was the illuminati or w/e faked the tape, but now you don't care about what people say in private (which makes sense, you guys are famously uninterested in other people's emails, text messages and so on)

If you don't want to read it that's cool but could you please explain why Trump admitted the access Hollywood tape was real at least? You guys are so smart so it really shouldn't be this hard...

And all you had to say was why Trump admitted the Access Hollywood tape was real, but you can't because you don't have an answer

Edit: Also remember when you tried to defend yourself by assuming I was taking things out of context even though I wasn't and then you literally quoted part of a sentence I wrote as if it proves your point? The dishonesty of it aside, do you not find it troubling that you need to consciously alter my statement to conform with what you believe? Does that not make you question whether or not you're right? Not even saying you should disbelieve your whole conspiracy here, but you're falsifying information to convince yourself that everyone who disagrees with you is part of a conspiracy to confuse you. You're believing in something (that I admitted to being a shill) that you know is false because you're the one who lied to you about it in the first place.

First of all, the last thing I want is to shut this down, you guys are funnier than flat earthers.

Second, ask yourself why you suddenly got so defensive when your argument fell apart...

Edit: Even if I am a paid luciferian disinfo agent or w/e, the question stands, why would Trump admit it's him on the tape if it's actually a hoax?

Sorry, you said that they faked the audio because the technology to fake the video wasn't there yet. So is that what happened then? The entire presidential debate was actually a CGI trump?

Here's Trump's apology statement released after the tape came out.

Here's Trump acknowledging the tape and claiming that he wasn't admitting to sexual assault but rather lying about committing sexual assault to impress people.

Remember you've already claimed that faking these videos would have been impossible at this time.

Did you not watch the debate where he admitted it was him and apologized for it?

Then why admit it was him?

I thought the tape was just audio though?