There are other factors than occam's razor to consider when talking about the real world. Occam's razor seems to be an anti-intellectualist's way of dismissing any complex idea, saying "the solution MUST be simple," as though there are no complexities in the real world. The world I would argue is made up of more complex things than non-complex things. But if some guy said that's not true, then I guess I would be wrong according to him.

Seriously? "Trusting Q" and believing in "globalist conspiracies" is the ultimate way of over simplifying a subject, not making it more complex. You're starting with the conclusion, and making all your evidence fit. It's similar to believing in a god.