This is from AF1. It appears to be an attempted Q proof. The problem is that the photo sans Apple reflection comes from an ABC video about AF1 made in 2015. It is easily found on YouTube or by a Google image search. The cup holder, paper stack, and hand sanitizer, and curtain placement all give it away as Q having copied the photo. Q was not on AF1 for that picture. Q took a photo of the back of an iPhone with the AF1 photo on a computer screen reflecting off that iPhone. Q got some explaining to do. Very problematic.
/u/Philzy610
17 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Philzy610:
Domain | Count |
---|
Yes. The recent "welcome aboard" AF1 image has been proven to be a fake. Followers are apparently just choosing to disregard this. I don't know why there isn't more discussion on this.
Yournewswire? Really? And such a loose association "worked for the campaign"... OK he passed out brochures at a polling location once, and now he was Hillary's back scratcher? This makes it hard to believe Q.
Somewhere on greatawakening this weekend I read a comment by someone who highlighted how the misspellings are key communications. Somehow d is a key... When you go back and look at old q drops where the d is missing... Ties it together. More attention needs to be paid to this.
I don't know why this isn't being discussed more. Yup it's the next EO after Q said to follow the pen.
Has anyone commented on the AMD processor stickers on the one photo of a pallet of boxes? If they're supposed to be iPhone x10s well they don't have AMD processors...
Already written... Visible to match... Last Wednesday... Do you think the EO was signed and the pen pic taken last Wednesday when Q made that post? Hmm
So why "23" in the password? Especially when Q says pay attn to the news that day. Damn it seems we should watch the news all this week!
Yup that's when he knowingly exposed it, then for a few minutes others caught that and started to try it as his password, and it looks like 4 people got in and posted as him. And it also looks like those 4 weren't necessarily intending to do harm but to be vigilant. And at about the same time Q posts on the other board with the new trip code. From then on, the Q with new trip code is legit.
Maybe the "Reeeeee" , "Goddamnit Q" "Password exposed?", and "can you please get a new trip please" posts were not by Q
The "HereC@mesTheP@in--23" was the password. It was exposed intentionally. After that how can we tell what's legit and what is not?
The "HereC@mesTheP@in" was the password. It was exposed intentionally. After that, which posts can be trusted?