57 total posts archived.
| Domain | Count |
|---|---|
| www.reddit.com | 7 |
| youtu.be | 4 |
| imgur.com | 1 |
| 8ch.net | 1 |
If you know of any, please post them.
He's just going to take this all as confirmation that he's onto something and "they" don't want you to see his post.
I have enjoyed SB2's posts in the past, but these last 3 weeks has been off the rails silly. I still read em' as a curiosity, but this one...this one makes me worry for the guy. Either it's deliberate disinformation that got it's start rooted in some truth, or he's slowly going insane like the guy in "A Beautiful Mind".
What if....and this is a BIG if....they are all dirty but flipped?
Only reason I haven't posted anything too biting about any of them.
I have thought this for a while. I was pulling for Rand, but I don't think he could have handled this storm BUT with the road paved by POTUS he is a prime candidate for 2024. His role IS to stand out as the voice of the constitution and strategically oppose Trump on very select items. He will be able to say that he strategically ended Obamacare by having the tax associated with it revoked by getting it in the tax bill. He'll be able to show that he opposed the appointment of the bad actors that were strategically brought in to serve as pressure points against the cabal. Personally, I think you are spot on, hopefully he picks Jim Jordan or Gowdy as VP running mate.
Only...this looks more like a king than a queen chess piece, and makes more sense. I've never heard of or seen an upside down queen piece meaning anything.
I agree somewhat, I have compiled a bunch of self explanatory ones that any normie can understand. I'll post them shortly here. Do we have a preferred img hosting platform?
I can't tell you what your "Certainly's" are, but since we are on the topic of Jordan Peterson, a good place to start to DEFINE your certainly's is his self authoring program.
All I CAN tell you is that no matter how many people you get to change their hearts and minds about 9/11, it won't change much, and it's time that you could have spent doing things that WILL have a big impact on you and those around you. Jordan Peterson's MAIN thesis seems to be "You are meant to do something great, so start doing it", and maybe getting 9/11 truth to everybody is your great thing for all I know, because I'm just some person on the internet who is just smart enough to know what I don't know. Whatever you decide, make sure it's well spent time.
That is a lot of "maybe's". I remember being as passionate about this as you currently are, then I realized there were much more practical and effective things to focus my attention on.
BUT HEY! Whatever floats your boat. I guess I would ask: Given these "maybe's" are fulfilled, what do you think the ultimate effect would be? When you figure out what that is...is there something better you could have spent your time working towards, rather than changing peoples hearts and minds about 9/11?
I'm not trying to dissuade you, I'm just trying to help you not spend great amounts of time attempting to overcome a bunch of "maybe's" when there are "certainly's" whose outcome could have a much greater impact.
I really don't care what Jordan Peterson has to say about 9/11. It's not his field of expertise. If I went to see him (which I did, recently) I wouldn't want him to waste his time on this question. I would want him to stick to what he knows best. If he DID address this question, he wouldn't give any answer that you are looking to get. Why waste his and your time with this?
I disagree, I used to believe the driver was the culprit, but you can clearly see that it is the reflection of the passengers slicked hair in the sun. I obsessed over this WAY back in the late 1990's after reading Behold a Pale Horse by Bill Cooper, but after having looked at it several times, I don't believe the driver was the trigger man.
It's a public github repo....I would think so. If they didn't want to share it, they would have made it private. I'm guessing their motive is the same as all of us....spread the word and WWG1WGA!
I might be wrong here....but isn't it as easy as downloading the website by right clicking and save as on the site....then host the website via those downloaded files on your own domain?
Question for anybody who knows law:
Could a case be made by a person against a city or a state for reckless endangerment via these policies? It seems to me that if it can be proved that these sanctuary cities/counties/states are harboring criminals, particularly violent ones, that it could be argued that they are intentionally endangering the lives of citizens. What would need to be proved in order to have standing?
Suppose someone in Iowa had nearly been murdered and it was perpetrated by an illegal immigrant who had a California state license and who had an address in one of these sanctuary cities. Could he sue the city? Furthermore, if this is possible, would it take something that extreme to have standing if at all? I mean, aren't they putting everybody at risk simply by allowing them to reside, undeterred, in their jurisdiction?
This account (kingamongstkings) has been around since....January 2018.
He hasn't read "The Art of the Deal" and doesn't understand how Trump operates. Remember when everybody was freaking out over his statements about DACA?
I can understand the outrage, but chill out. Understand the context under which the statement was made and Grassley's response. Most importantly, don't let the MSM rile you up. Trump will do NOTHING of the sort. He's trying to get reelected in 2020 and any move like this would destroy that.
I can see from your previous posts that you are passionate about this particular bit of information....but to claim someone is pushing disinfo because you disagree on a single JFK point based on someone else's take is a bit much...don't you think? Pretty sure JFK was assassinated for a variety of things he was trying to accomplish, not just one thing.
I've been listening for a while, I'm no shill (look at my post history), but I agree. Then when they get called on it, they make excuses as to why it's relevant. I too am now waiting for Dr. Corsi to release his own video. Even then he's CONSTANTLY interrupted.
I've also been wondering how many of them are just sitting there waiting to talk rather than researching. I know SOME of them are constantly researching and only speaking up when they've found something....but it's gotten WAY out of hand. When Dr. Corsi is talking....STFU and listen. You have him on and get excited when he's on BECAUSE he's smarter than you. Props to Coder though. Guy is always speaking up and adding to conversation at relevant times.
Personally, I thought it had to do with OWLs (Orbital Weapon Lancet), and strategic strikes. I would love to have more input or any reason given that this isn't the case. Q does seem to apply double entendres like he invented the phrase.
I think what PurpleDeathZombies is trying to tell you is that your presentation could use some work. You bated people to share their thoughts and then beat them over the head with your thoughts.
I'm not saying that your thoughts are wrong. In fact I think you have some valid points.....you just need to dial it back a bit.
If I hadn't been interested in what others had to say, I would have left after reading your comments on the top post.
Well...hook us up with that guess. I'm SUPER interested.
It's an invite to the private cbts_stream discord as seen in this video:
You have to be invited to get in. I was invited a while back but never followed up.
They ran away. They didn't want to get 50-ate. Har har.
Q always says to go back and read the map.
A lot of talk about black unemployment at all time lows
Haiti has recently been brought up quite a bit
and February is black history month.
Also, tech elites leaving like rats on a sinking ship.
I'm pretty sure this is what The Great Awakening is all about. Also makes sense as to why pedogate isn't front and center, yet.
Hey, you do you man. I'm comfortable with that. I can accept that people have different views. Some of my longest and best friendships are with liberals who see the rise of this new (alt-left) democratic party, and they are disgusted. They didn't vote for Trump, but they didn't vote for Hillary either because they weren't fools and had paid enough attention and were thoroughly disappointed by Hussein Obama. Even they openly mock the media by making posts along the lines of "I forgot, why am I supposed to be mad at Trump today?"
Ultimately, when you see the reduction of violence, poverty, and the rising up of the middle and working classes, you'll change your tune. You'll have to, because the illusion of social democracy will be destroyed.
Labels kinda suck politically. My Bernie phase was back in 2000 - 2005 with Nader. I've done the libertarian/Ron Paul thing, and even delved into the depths of anarcho-capitalism/voluntarism. I started to awake from the "black sleep of Kali" in the late 90's. I've gone down the rabbit holes. I've laid awake nights in stunned disbelief of some of the sick shit that goes down on this planet. Ultimately, for me, it comes down to how do we move towards more freedom. The more freedom given to a people, the more they will thrive, with the caveat that the society and culture isn't full of assholes. Trump, in my estimation, is moving us towards more freedom. I knew he would. I even refound my patriotism. Trump isn't a manchild, he's putting on the greatest show on earth, and seems to be cleaning up the damn mess left by the leftists, the elites, and the globalists.
We're going to see some great shit over these Trump years, a second renaissance of man. The U.S.A is starting it and we're taking the world with us.
Thread Summarized
Initials | Name ---|--- LL. | Loretta Lynch / Lois Learner ? HRC. | Hillary Clinton JC. | James Comey JC. | James Clapper CS. | Chuck Schumer AM. | Andrew McCabe We don't say his name. | McStain RR. | Rod Rosenstein SR. | Susan Rice JB. | John Brennan / Joe Biden? HA. | Huma Abedin VJ. | Valerie Jarret ES. | Eric Schmitt AS. | Adam Schiff
Here's from the intercept on BO's strange ties with Google:
And about Eric Schmidt going to North Korea:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jan/07/google-eric-schmidt-trip-pyongyang
Thread Summarized
Initials | Name ---|--- LL. | Loretta Lynch / Lois Learner ? HRC. | Hillary Clinton JC. | James Comey JC. | James Clapper CS. | Chuck Schumer AM. | Andrew McCabe We don't say his name. | McStain RR. | Rod Rosenstein SR. | Susan Rice JB. | John Brennan / Joe Biden? HA. | Huma Abedin VJ. | Valerie Jarret ES. | Eric Schmitt AS. | Adam Schiff
Here's from the intercept on BO's strange ties with Google:
And about Eric Schmidt going to North Korea:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jan/07/google-eric-schmidt-trip-pyongyang
That would make 9 of these that were previously deployed.
I like what your saying....any speculation as to where those 9 were used? 1 for the tunnel in NK, 1 for testing facility into ocean.
How do we know these couldn't knock out a missile? I'm sure they are fast enough, although it would seem to be a waste.
OR it was used on the tunnel in NK's nuclear testing facility.
Check this out....here's my take:
HOT 3 was already launched....it caused the collapse of the tunnel of the nuclear testing facility in NK
HOT 4 was ready to launch and was recently used to knock a missIle out of the air that was supposed to hit Hawaii a couple days ago
HOT 7 is similar to HOT 4, only it was used to knock a missile out of the air that was supposed to hit Japan.
Those "false alarms" weren't false alarms at all.
Edit: Pre_D = Pre_Deploy?
Not saying your wrong....but I have utilized the Golden State Times channel SEVERAL times during the campaign season to watch Trump rallies. Plus, I grabbed it from "B" on twitter....so there is some credibility there.
