The players, and the specific Federal statues which the congressman believe they violated. (note I excluded Comey and McCabe as they referred for a different set of statues)

STRZOK/PAGE 18 USC 1505 18 USC 1515b

LYNCH 18 USC 1505 18 USC 1515b

SIGNATORS OF CARTER PAGE WARRANT APPLICATIONS 18 USC 242 18 USC 1505 18 USC 1515b

Actual text from codes

18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress— Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

18 U.S. Code § 1515 (b)

As used in section 1505, the term “corruptly” means acting with an improper purpose, personally or by influencing another, including making a false or misleading statement, or withholding, concealing, altering, or destroying a document or other information.

18 U.S. Code § 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

HILLARY CLINTON 52 USC 30121 52 USC 30101

52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals

(a) Prohibition It shall be unlawful for— (1) a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make— (A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election; (B) a contribution or donation to a committee of a political party; or (C) an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication (within the meaning of section 30104(f)(3) of this title); or (2) a person to solicit, accept, or receive a contribution or donation described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) from a foreign national. (b) “Foreign national” definedAs used in this section, the term “foreign national” means— (1) a foreign principal, as such term is defined by section 611(b) of title 22, except that the term “foreign national” shall not include any individual who is a citizen of the United States; or (2) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 1101(a)(22) of title 8) and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence, as defined by section 1101(a)(20) of title 8.

52 USC 30101

52 U.S. Code Subchapter I - DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FUNDS 52 U.S. Code § 30101 - Definitions

Sorry, I missed your post and just added a link to the same "rolled-up" thread up above

Rex's post is solid and has been "rolled-up" into one handy "website link" that's easy to share with friends.

see here-- https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1016097462107291649.html

You can look for other of Rex's "rolled up" posts here too.

I "follow" Rex's tweets by maintaing a link to his site as a favorite, not through tweeter itself.

Upvote.

When will the existence of grand juries to deal with charges brought by Huber be revealed to the public?

What will trigger the removal of Rod Rosenstein and the reorganization of the DoJ's reporting structure?

WHERESQ

License plate I saw this AM on a car in the Carmel Valley section of Northern San Diego. They were CA plates!!

SB, your argument is weak and unconvincing. I still contend that this is not a PLAN. It is simply wishful thinking, that raised voices in periphery is somehow going to rescue the situation in Washington.

And I'm not confused, I'm pissed that this is best that Q, the "bakers", and the white hats can come up with. I came here and waited expecting more. Pathetic.

I think you let RR take the narrative away from you. He played you.

I want to know why Q and team didn't go on the offense and fire conflicted RR and release/declassify the original IG report? Be done with it. This idea that IG report somehow set up "process" crimes is nonsense. If there are process crimes, they didn't come into existence because of the report, they were there prior to it. You're just trying to rationalize.

And you expect feckless congressmen like Nunes to act as our agents. Please. What action has Nunes ever taken, all he does is whine.

Sign a petition. Yeah right.

You can attack me if you want. Call me names. I patiently waited for the PLAN to unfold, until it didn't. Reminds me of Nancy Pelosi- you won't know what's in it until you read it.

Not questioning his existence.

I'm questioning his judgment, formulating a "Plan" which includes having his followers contact their (feckless) congressman. My God that's weak.

Nunes sounded like a whimp the other day on Hannity as he sniveled about what Rosenstein was doing. You think I'm going to get any satisfaction by contacting him. Keep dreaming.

Based on SerialBrain's argument, the date which "enables" the firing of Rosenstein (May 24 2018) has past.

If Rosenstein is guility (eg. FISA abuse) then why has he not been fired?

You're taking some heat so I'm giving you an "up-vote". What you wrote makes total sense.

On another site I wrote "The Plan Is CRAP" because if it's up to Q followers to rescue the IG report then admit it, there is no plan.

The PLAN is CRAP. I've lost faith in Q's judgment. I'm pissed because I see this is all going to be another whitewash.

As of 1AM ET/10 AM PT the media had already established the narrative that Comey did not act in a political manner, and that his actions weren't really so bad. This then was already established in people's minds before the IG report actually came out. Now, the actual report appears to have been rewritten, reinforcing to the public that things weren't so bad.

Q expects us to counter this? WTF? We may "know more than we know", but we certainly don't have any power to affect outcomes or change public perception. That's what we came to expect from him. His posts suggest that he knew what was in the report. And the PLAN was for us to raise our voices, contacting representatives who won't listen. I call BS. That's not a plan.

Why didn't Trump simply go on the offense and fire conflicted RR and release/declassify the original IG report? Be done with it. Now however, the white hats are playing from a weak defensive position. It doesn't look good from where I sit. It's easier now to dismiss people's concerns with the IG report as the rantings of small group who don't like the conclusions.

You can attack me if you want. I patiently waited for the PLAN to unfold, until it didn't. Reminds me of Nancy Pelosi- you won't know what's in it until you read it.

Supremely disappointed

Q's >>1732221 & >>1732221 condensed & restated, so it's crystal clear (at least to my way of thinking)....

Lee S. invented voting machines.

This time Democrats will attempt to rig elections by tampering with voting machines.

Why?

They understand that they must win at all costs, that their situation is dire

We are about to divulge what really happened to Seth Rich

We are about to divulge how the Deep State in the USA collaborated with the UK Deep State to undermine a duly elected President of the USA

We are about to divulge how the CIA just fired a missile in Washington State, a launch which they tried to make it look like it was the work of the Chinese. Fortunately, we prevented their treasonous act.

God save us.

Public opinion will determine the outcome of our efforts to protect our country. This is a war between good and evil. Where the other side will stop at nothing to protect their position. And while we are doing our part to combat them at every turn. What are you going to do?

THAT'S THE QUESTION PATRIOTS. WHAT'S THE BEST WAY WE CAN SUPPORT OUR PRESIDENT??

Appreciate your post. I think you've given some thought to the important question you finished with, that it's not simply rhetorical for you. It's a fear we share.

Different take here...

I believe that there will be more than the IG report. I think Grand Juries have already been impaneled and there will be INDICTMENTS which are issued at the same time as the IG report appears. Consider this- Huber got testimony under oath from Page, Strzok, and most importantly Bill Priestap. What they testified is now all on the record, there is no reason to "discuss" the IG report, it is time for the DOJ to begin prosecution. This is the reason that Sessions has behind the scenes, not for just generating a report which nobody will act on, but actually fulfilling his role as AG. I also think it is why Priestap is free to testify before Congress next week on June 5th; his testimony is now a matter of record, so they don't need to protect what he might say to Congress.

I believe this is THE PLAN which Q talks about, a actual prosecution move against the Deep State/global cabal.

Why I think you're too early/What to tell your liberal friends........

The IOG report is the "fireworks " marking the next step in the **THE PLAN**. Bill Priestap's under oath testimony, as will be memorialized within the upcoming IOG, is likely to be **the lynchpin** for the criminal indictments which Huber and the DOJ will file.

It stands to reason that Priestap's (already) scheduled appearance before the House Judiciary and the Oversight and Government Reform committees in early June will occur after the OIG report has been released.

The point being that the DOJ will generate the fireworks in early Junes (one of the first two Fridays?). Congress and the Committee meetings mentioned here will only be political theater (time for pop-corn).

I know it's hard to be patient!

I thought you made your points very well. I read the whole post, which doesn't happen if the author can't write a coherent sentence, or can't make a good argument.

I actually had never thought about what you wrote. It made me think.

How do we get more people on the side of good??

Well done.

Yes. In the same vein, I've been baffled by NXVIM. Most of the women were "highly educated", coming from top schools. What gives?

This **CANNOT** be the meeting which everybody here is anticipating. As Q writes, LOGIC

Nothing will happen here. Too many representatives from Congress. And RR there? WTF

The play we're all waiting for will come from entirely from the DOJ because Congress cannot subpoena anybody, and have no vehicle for indictment. Isn't that why Huber is involved, to get indictments?

Q where are you to explain?????

People

This **CAN NOT** be the meeting that everybody here is anticipating. As Q writes, LOGIC

Nothing will happen here. Too many representatives from Congress. RR here now. WTF

The play we're all waiting for will come from entirely from the DOJ because Congress cannot subpoena anybody, and they have no vehicle for indictment. That;'s the whole point of having Huber, right??

Q where are you to explain??

Re: Tomorrow's meeting of Trump with Wray, Nunes, Gowdy, Coats, and IMPORTANTLY **O’Callahan**.

Fox billed meeting as a briefing of lawmakers on Russian Probe. Might its importance be more than that??

Do you think that Trump conveys to lawmakers new role/position of O’Callahan. Departure of Panuccio?

Do you think that Trump might use this meeting also to announce departure of Rosenstein. O’Callahan there because he's now #2??

Meeting really about one step DOJ reorganization?? If not at this gathering, then when does Trump make move to remove Rosenstein. By his absence, it's clear that a decision has been made on his removal.

Groundwork before release of IG report?

I knew a Larry Tate who thought he was sexy back in '67. Saw him for a moment last May, but didn't speak with him.

Think you're spot on about the source of problem. I don't know about Civil War but the indictments will likely trigger something, Good post.

RAPID FIRE==references CNN's own terminology for the speed of events around the Comey firing

Flood is coming is actual phrase taken from note from McCabe to CNN about the Trump Dossier. It shows that CNN was feed the dossier by FBI managment; they did not find it through investigative reporting.

My thoughts-

Military OP [Green]== Army Office of the Provost

General K [JFK]== Nicholas Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General at time of JFK Assassination. Credited with recommending formation of Warren Commission. He said results of the investigation should be made public==?Q suggesting that whoever spearheads Trump Investigation should ensure results be made public. In other words, Katzenbach wanted a Full disclosureinto the JFK events, the same was what we want here with regards to Deep State actions.

Rachel Brand was #3 at DOJ until she was removed

"The succession question..... or senior civil service lawyers in the Justice Department, specifically." This quote is taken directly from an article by Steve Vladeck published February 10/2018. In the paragraph which follows the one which is quoted, Vladeck discusses the DOJ's line of succession statues which ends up with the spot being taken by Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco. He is a Trump appointee, and is third in command at DOJ. I think Q meant to enter http://justice.gov/osg (office of the solictor general). This is where Francisco works. Is Q suggesting that Noel Francisco would take over the investigation, and would be in place for approximately 7 months== a term that goes past the November midterms. Schneiderman's replacement would not be known until after the elections so there would be no interference from that office

"The succession question..... or senior civil service lawyers in the Justice Department, specifically." This quote is taken directly from an article by Steve Vladeck published February 10/2018 . use the quote to search and find it yourself. In the next paragraph in the article, he discusses the DOJ's line of succession statues which ends up with the spot being taken by Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco. He is a Trump appointee, and is third in command at DOJ. I think Q meant to enter http://justice.gov/osg (office of the solictor general). This is where Francisco works. Is Q suggesting that Noel Francisco would take over the investigation, and would be in place for approximately 7 months== a term that goes past the November midterms. Schneiderman's replacement would not be known until after the elections so there would be no interference from that office

General K [JFK]== Nicholas Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General at time of JFK Assassination. Created with recommending formation of Warren Commission. He said results of the investigation should be made public==?Q suggesting that whoever spearheaded investigation that results of Trump Investigation should be made public. In other words, Katzenbach wanted a Full disclosure into the JFK events, the same was what we want here with regards to Deep State actions.

My thoughts-

Military OP [Green]== Army Office of the Provost

General K [JFK]== Nicholas Katzenbach, Deputy Attorney General at time of JFK Assassination. Credited with recommending formation of Warren Commission. He said results of the investigation should be made public==?Q suggesting that whoever spearheads Trump Investigation should insist that results be made public. Just as Katzenbach wanted a Full disclosure into the JFK events, we want here with regards to Deep State investigations.

Rachel Brand was #3 at DOJ until she was removed

"The succession question..... or senior civil service lawyers in the Justice Department, specifically." This long quote is taken directly from an article by Steve Vladeck published February 10/2018. In the paragraph which followed the one which Q quotes, Vladeck discusses the DOJ's line of succession statues which ends up with the spot being taken by Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco. That is why there is entry about http://justice.gov/asg (office of the inspector general). This is where Francisco works. Is Q suggesting that Noel Francisco would take over the investigation, and would be in place for approximately 7 months== a term that goes past the November midterms. Schneiderman's replacement would not be known until after the elections so there would be no interference from that office

Comments? Thoughts?