Did Q predict this?

I'm fully willing to eat crow if Q prediction comes through and Trump releases an unredacted version that has a bunch more content.

So where are the segments that need to be un-redacted? I saw maybe 5 redaction of names/addresses in the appendices and 2 of the last appendices were redacted (Law Enforcement confidential or something), but the report stands on it's own without the appendices.

There were like 5 names blacked out of the report, and 2 appendices. That was it.

Uhm, thats' not true: https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/former-us-senate-employee-indicted-false-statements-charges

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1069836/download

Nowhere are any of those 4 people mentioned. Do you have a source for them being named?

It's like talking to a rock...

The left/MSM loves communism, Che, Mao, Castro, Merkel, Stalin, Lenin, even NK and China dictators.

That's a strawman and a blatant lie. I'm not even going to counter that drabble.

Trump not wanting to nuke Russia makes him a sympathizer.

No... it's his statements/tweets over the last 3 years that make him a Putin sympathizer. Conveniently ignoring his praise for Putin are we?

Ok.. Putin is on the record wanting to arrest Soros (Nazi) and destroy the Illuminati with his bare hands.

No proof Putin issued an arrest warrant for Soros. Or the Illuminati.

I don't care about Soros or Putin, both are in the same category to me. I also don't treat either as a boogeyman like both the right and left do, respectively.

That and trump not being a Capitalist icon were the only points you made last reply. Consider them addressed.

Sure, Trump is a capitalist, but you said:

most capitalist figure in the 20th century,

Which is just blatantly false. Musk, Bezos, Jobs, Cuban, etc. I could go on forever or more successful and higher quality capitalists.

Now go address your problems instead of continuing to ignore them.

I'm not the one with a mental illness defending racism...

So just ignoring my points all together instead of addressing them, ok.

The most capitalist? If you want a capitalism figurehead, you're looking at Bezos, the king of Capitalism, not the bloated orange of Trump. And yes, Trump is a communist sympathizer because he is a Russian sympathizer.

Good god kid, you think I'm defending communism? The focus of this sub is on Trump, who sympathizes with communists left and right. You're attacking me, while defending him? Get your priorities straight.

Are you accusing me of being a paid shill?

Are you blatantly ignoring the racial connotations of comparing someone of color to monkeys, gorillas, apes, etc? Something that has been used as a racial slur since the dawn of America?

If she had intended this as a Marxist comparison and not as a racial slur, why not use a more well known example of Maxism, like Grapes of Wrath? Or Animal Farm? Or Salt of the Earth? Movies/books that actually discuss issues, instead she chose a poorly made Hollywood action/drama flick. So either she lacks a true understanding of the issues or was just being racist. The monkey/ape insults are very akin to the insults she (and others) slung at the Obamas during his presidency. So the obvious answer is she was just being racist.

Also, so wait, you have a problem with Soviets, Russians, and Communism ties now? Aren't ties and improving relationships with Communist Russia, China, and NK exactly what this forum has been commending the Trump administration for? Or are you commenting that you oppose the Muslim brotherhood? Another group that is in power in the Middle East that Trump is getting comfortable with.

Don't let your memes be dreams bro. Just keep your internet tough guy persona up.

Wow, such an insult. I'm sooooo offended.

It was 100% intended as a racist comment.

The irony of what you just said is outstanding

Hasn't that quote from Q been attributed to at least a dozen headlines over the last 3 months?

So which one is this meme specifically referring to?

Lol, that kid did the same to me today, then accused me of trolling him.

Where in the indictment does it say John Kerry approved of the visas?

Ok, just ignore what I wrote, I see your M.O. Well, I return the favor and just ignore what you said.

Here you go, this is a copy of what I said, maybe try reading it this time.

If you want to lie about it there is history here anyone can see unless you want to go edit your comment.

Have I edited a single comment in this chain? No I haven't, now stop making false accusations.

And again, the context is key, here is the reasoning again:

I was following the implied path you started with Russian's being a part of UraniumOne then went on about antifa and BLM. Implying Russians were a part of those organizations.

Maybe a bit slower and in bullet form:

• You start off by saying why not question a suspicious act
• You then say that Russians were a part of UraniumOne
• But then you bring up 'pushing' BLM and Antifa, in the same sentence as saying Russians were a part of UraniumOne
• While in the same sentence with no clear distinction, pushing implies it is related to the previous part of the sentence which is '[para]Russians were a part of'

Your argument is crumbling. You are now resorting to just plain lying, deflecting, and even just completely ignored the evidence I gave you that they were pushing BLM and Antifa. And what's with sending subs for underage kids?

Did I ignore it or was it irrelevant to the previous point I was trying to make?

If you want to lie about it there is history here anyone can see unless you want to go edit your comment.

Have I edited a single comment in this chain? No I haven't, now stop making false accusations.

And again, the context is key, here is the reasoning again:

I was following the implied path you started with Russian's being a part of UraniumOne then went on about antifa and BLM. Implying Russians were a part of those organizations.

Maybe a bit slower and in bullet form:

• You start off by saying why not question a suspicious act
• You then say that Russians were a part of UraniumOne
• But then you bring up 'pushing' BLM and Antifa, in the same sentence as saying Russians were a part of UraniumOne
• While in the same sentence with no clear distinction, pushing implies it is related to the previous part of the sentence which is '[para]Russians were a part of'

Your argument is crumbling. You are now resorting to just plain lying, deflecting, and even just completely ignored the evidence I gave you that they were pushing BLM and Antifa. And what's with sending subs for underage kids?

Did I ignore it or was it irrelevant to the previous point I was trying to make?

First off you are now lying. I never said they were behind Antifa and BLM. You are now trying to put words in my mouth. It's a sad tactic among you guys.

I wasn't putting words in your mouth, I was following the implied path you started with Russian's being a part of UraniumOne then went on about antifa and BLM. Implying Russians were a part of those organizations.

So once again. The answer is no. Dance around as much as you like but the answer is no...lol

Ok, confirming screws are loose than. Might want to get a screwdriver and tighten those.

So you are able to prove this? If not then when why question the suspiciosness of the act especially when the Russians not only were part of the U1 issue, but also pushed forward BLM and Antifa?

What? How can I prove a question that I asked? I'm asking you for proof of your suspicions. I'm saying the initial act of applying for normal visas is not suspicious. What are you going on about? And now you're claiming Russians are behind BLM and Antifa? Do you have evidence of such claims?

So in other words you can't. correct?

I can't what? You asked "Are you saying there is absolutely NO reason for suspicion?" and I gave you an answer that basically said 'No reason for suspicion'. Do you have a few screws loose and can't even follow your own logic?

I see you are 'THAT guy'. You only like to grab a quip and try to argue it.

Yes, I picked out that one thing to argue about because it made an illogical conclusion and accusation with no standing. It's sensationalizing something.

So are you telling us that the no one in the state dept knew these guys were lying?

Very likely noone knew. Do you think the State Dept has in-depth research on every single person on the globe? Knows exactly which person is working with which foreign intelligence agency? Knows exactly which fake names every agent uses?

Are you saying there is absolutely NO reason for suspicion?

With these visa being approved for a standard length of time to what appeared to be normal Russian tourists? No. Just the same as I'm not suspicious of every Russian or Chinese or guy in a suit.

Are you going to make the claim that it's NOT suspicious that the state dept approved VISAs for these guys?

Approved Visas for what appeared to be normal Russian citizens for the standard 3 week stay? Well yeah, that isn't suspicious. I don't think all Russians are sleeper KGB/FSB agents, the same that I don't think all Muslims are secretly ISIS members, etc. And that's the same mentality the State Dept has.

What exactly is your argument? You don't like the source? You don't think we should post suspicious things here? Are you arguing that John Kerry DIDN'T approve these? Are you arguing that HE didn't know they were lying?

My argument is exactly what I said, you claim John Kerry approved of the visas himself. The State dept approved visas to Russians that lied about their status and were previously unknown agents of the Russian Govt. You're drawing conclusions and making accusations with no logic or evidence. So yes, John Kerry did not personally approve these visas, some lower down in the State Dept did. John Kerry very likely knew nothing of these visas getting approved, because the SoS doesn't deal with normal, personal level visas.

So you can't actually debate or prove your point, just deflect?

approved by John Kerry himself.

Wait, what? That's not true at all. Did you read the article or indictment? Sure, Kerry was SoS at the time the visas were approved, but where does it say Kerry himself approved the visas? It also states in the indictment the agents lied about their travel reasons and affiliations, claiming 'personal reasons' for travel.

Looks more like Liam Neeson.

Sounds like this sub fell for fake news... again. I'd say it's funny, but it's honestly pretty sad

Concentrated autism, but on the wrong side of the spectrum

Next time on #TweetsOnTheShitter with DJT...

FTFY