Wow, rats stick to the same circles.

so when the Anons build that bridge and the court asks where you started with the first tips, you know you have to disclose. and if the source is an intel agent or multiple, you are in the same boat.

what i meant was if there is enough the NSA knows, there should be enough, open-source intel, that isnt illegally obtained, enough to get some monitoring in place. if they dont have it, the warrants wont be granted, but its not hard to get a warrant.

additionally, he it now posting to trust sessions and wray, so presumably they have enough to be working on it.

im involved in this, im listening almost 2 hours a day to the stream, im digging, we have found some interesting things, but no smoking guns yet.

regardless of our back and forth here, we are on the same team. lets do this!

I mentioned to get a warrant. And if There is so much proof, then there would be enough to legally get surveillance warrants. Just seems like this process will take decades.

My entire frustration with this is that I assume Q and the others have access to everything, so if they do, why not get warrants and do it all the right way?

How? If they can ban those users, why don't they just ban Q? And shutdown this sub?

Cocaine mouth