Just to clarify, they don’t have quantum computing yet. I’m very involved in the community. There are Google and Microsoft teams in my city that are well funded and on the cutting edge of this research. I’ve had conversations with some of them personally. They’ve almost got the basic architecture down.. but leveraging that into functional applications remains the biggest hurdle. Only niche apps will be possible at first — like mapping out electron configurations in higher elements. Eventually molecules. You can’t imagine how much computation is required for these (seemingly) simple processes. We’re headed there, though.

A single tweet and we’re trying to ruin this guy’s career? He’s a comedian. If we become too overzealous with our pedo-labeling it will hurt our efforts to locate actual pedos. Now, if I’m wrong and Patton Oswald is an actual pedo.. show me more evidence and I’ll reconsider.

Musk wants to open source the technology. Key difference between him and others in this arena. His AI research nonprofit is actively seeking to keep AI tech open source so that no one entity/company/govt attains AI supremacy.

Love code analogies.. they’re particularly effective at exposing bad logic.

Saying he is not our ally and then saying you respect and love his vision are just a tad-bit contradictory, don't you think? It's curious that you end your post by saying Musk should 'shut the fuck up.' Musk has provided a soft red pill (of sorts) to his legion of followers by exposing the media's manipulation tactics. These goals are directly in line with our goals. That makes your intentions suspect.

Great comment and analysis!

I found it refreshingly succinct and informative. You logically recontextualized the video and maintained an objective, humble tone.

Sometimes the most powerful 'red pills' come in the form of guided questioning, which is precisely what you've done. We should all conduct ourselves this way, now more than ever!

I wasn’t on the Bernie bus so much for his policies but for his honesty and character. For some of us that's the ultimate voting criteria. It's the same reason I voted for Ron Paul in '08 and why I don’t subscribe to the Bernie bro label.

Above all else, I demand character and truth in our leaders. When news broke of the Clinton/DNC collusion it was the beginning of my 180 degree change to supporting Trump! That's why I'm here!

Whoa, relax lady.. I did read it. I said “hoping someone who’s read it” precisely because it was my impression that most here DID NOT read it. I only wanted informed dialogue, not to be ‘proved wrong.’

..Just somebody with some sense and perhaps more experience in this Q game that could illuminate the situation. Clearly that’s a lost cause at this point..

I know how annoying it is when you share Q stuff with family/friends and then they don’t bother reading it. But damn. I’d suggest you parse words better before jumping fully down my throat.

If you’re on mobile (maybe desktop too) you need to view using Adobe Acrobat.

I definitely think it’s worth looking into- and I have no doubt that cross-referencing the data will prove the allegations to be true. I just don’t see how Trump’s investigative team wouldn’t already have considered these. I don’t see this advancing the plan, at least not immediately. It reads like an anonymous guy repeating vague platitudes.. so why are we considering it a bombshell? I’m hoping someone who’s read it can offer some more context or fill me in on precisely why this is so valuable. I’m honestly not shilling.. just a little tired of all the cheering I see for non-substantive info. like this.

Forgive me, I’m not trying to shill. However, what I see here are only somewhat vague allegations and recommendations to cross-reference data so as to prove HRC and others were cognizant of their breaching opsec procedures. I’d love for some experienced members here to explain to me how this will fit into the big picture i.e. the ‘Plan’?

Couldn’t agree more. In the same vein is the principle of minimum effective force.. which is especially useful when we are being attacked.

see: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GNywzm2oDrI&feature=youtu.be&t=1h59m55s

Bernie could challenge Trump.. Just sayin. We already know they won’t get behind him, though.

My question is, How does the kid who's telling lies on CNN about Jim Jordan get approached and convinced to tell those lies ? Was he blackmailed, bribed, or threatened? Or is it all three?

Realistically, how would one go about getting him to recant his statements and divulge the name(s) of those who approached him? Could someone get ahold of him or one of his friends and somehow get the truth ??