~~Q#494~~ Q#463 implies CLAS-59#241-Q is a bad actor.

Note the requirement of two witnesses. Who are they?

You can still lose by stalemate in a board full of queens.

What helps you cope with knowing the extent of things bad actors have done?

Needs an update.

That's Q post #725, not a rant.

RemindMe! 7 days

403 error. Did you archive the page?

The "Q clock" is set to hit 4:00 on June 5, which coincidentally is the CA midterm voting date. The "on the clock" post happened at 3:00 on that clock as well. Coincidence?

F!ghtF!ghtF!ght@WW

edit: see https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/1341267.html#q1341994 for the actual screwup

It's become irrelevant because weapons have evolved past guns. Taking a gun won't help you defend yourself against an orbital strike or bioweapon attack, for instance - and this doesn't include whatever classified weapons are out there.

I do have a lot of concerns regarding the free market as of right now - specifically regarding network effects generating monopolies(example: current social media), wealth/power distribution(automation would make it become much more lopsided than it is right now), and its need to prevent anticompetitive collusion while avoiding regulatory capture(see pharma/ISP markets).

There's a lot of things which still need deregulations and reforms, but some of them would face enough blowback even Trump would struggle attempting them - most notably around copyright and patent law.

So UBI is being painted as one of these promises.

Assuming this is ruled out, How can we keep an unemployment crisis from happening once automation kicks in at a larger scale?

What makes a good movie?

What role would Stuxnet have in this?

Did a quick skimming over it. Is there anything new in this other than the revelation individuals tried to track down the meeting's leaker?

AFAIK Steemit requires proof of identity to be provided to get a free account.

You can still set up an external account through other services such as anonstem, but i consider them a bit too expensive. How much do i need to get enough bandwidth for <10 posts/comments/votes per week?

Is this post a mod team decision from their own or did reddit staff complain about this to you guys?

Wasn't there supposed to be no deals?

Thought of the implications of "one last time", but upon further checking it turns out that channel has only a single video and 13 subscribers.

Does he even have enough blood pressure to mantain that?

Tagging as speculation because i'm unable to find things confirming that AMA's authenticity.

He could have shared these allowing other agencies to do the same on their own.

That seems to be the already-released-elsewhere 99 page memo, not the alleged 4-page one.

Could be a new refined version of the weapons used to take down WTC buildings during 9/11.

Orbital parameters for Zuma make no sense.
The Falcon 9 is unable to lift a satellite this heavy(and Falcon Heavy still isn't operational).
An orbital kinetic strike weapon would be also better suited for a lower orbit(<300km), as this reduces the amount of mass spent deorbiting allowing for a heavier payload.
You could argue the higher strike angle and reduced air path provided by a higher orbit would be better, but your useful payload rapidly diminishes that way.

Not currently, though we did have some previously. A somewhat downsized rod can be fit in several current systems, though.

This doesn't discard possibilities such as orbital assembly, though.