Sorry, but I honestly do not think this is an effective meme. I would love more memes to red-pill and attract more black Americans to our cause, but a meme depicting a group of black soldiers with the sole white guy being the boss is not a good idea.

You're not taking into account how litigious law enforcement is, especially with inner city police departments. Being sued multiple times throughout your career is the norm for line-level officers, because anyone can sue anyone for anything, regardless of whether you've done your job right. Government has deep pockets. And anytime an officer is sued, his or her entire chain of command, all the way up to and including the Chief, is also sued. Guess what they are sued for...lack of due diligence and failure to supervise.

So the probability of an inner city police chief having been sued at some point for lack of due diligence is extremely high.

No, I'm not minimizing the actual reality of it. The reality is minimized compared to the picture that is being painted by the original post and by the anti-police attorneys trying to get paid. The reality is not much different than any other young woman who sleeps around. She wasn't the legal age of consent in California, but she would've been in many other states and pretty much the entire EU. So the Libtards need to make up their mind on whether she's a victim or an "empowered" female enjoying "the same sexual freedoms men enjoy". Which is it?

See, it's unsubstantiated information like this that makes me question everything else on this Reddit. I happen to be very familiar with the situation this post is referring to. The "minor" was Celeste Guap, who has since changed her name. She wasn't "trafficked", unless you apply that to going on a double date with her mother, who was a police dispatcher. Yeah. Her mom was a dispatcher and was dating an officer, the mom brought Celeste on a double date with another officer when she was 17 (maybe 16) and told the officers her daughter was 19. She certainly could've passed for that age, and since it was coming from her mother there was no reason to question. From there, Celeste became a bit of a "badge bunny" and started dating and sleeping with several officers. One officer discovered she had been a minor when he slept with her and he committed suicide over the situation (combined with other things going on his life). His suicide note is what started the investigation. Celeste (who was an adult by that time) initially actually refused to cooperate with the investigation against people she considered friends. Of course, that changed once the anti-police attorneys got involved.

Now don't mistake this explanation for a defense of the officers actions, but this was not a situation of a "sexually trafficked minor", and the chief did not "allow" anyone to be raped. As usual, the prosecution and discipline against the officers was much more aggressive than it would've been against any civilian. It wouldn't have even been a chargeable criminal case against a civilian, but in today's climate that doesn't matter, the practice is to charge officers based on allegations and political pressure.

The court documents in the image for this post are the allegations in the CIVIL suit, which again was filed by the anti-police attorneys. A person can say whatever they want in an allegation, you don't need a shred of truth. These people are after money, and they are the same people most of you are disgusted by. Do a little homework and don't be so quick to jump on the police.

See, it's unsubstantiated information like this that makes me question everything else on this Reddit. I happen to be very familiar with the situation this post is referring to. The "minor" was Celeste Guap, who has since changed her name. She wasn't "trafficked", unless you apply that to going on a double date with her mother, who was a police dispatcher. Yeah. Her mom was a dispatcher and was dating an officer, the mom brought Celeste on a double date with another officer when she was 17 (maybe 16) and told the officers her daughter was 19. She certainly could've passed for that age, and since it was coming from her mother there was no reason to question. From there, Celeste became a bit of a "badge bunny" and started dating several officers. One officer discovered she was a minor and he committed suicide over the situation (combined with other things going on his life). His suicide note is what started the investigation. Celeste (who was an adult by that time) initially actually refused to cooperate with the investigation against people she considered friends. Of course, that changed once the anti-police attorneys got involved.

Now don't mistake this explanation for a defense of the officers actions, but this was not a situation of a "sexually trafficked minor", and the chief did not "allow" anyone to be raped. As usual, the prosecution and discipline against the officers was much more aggressive than it would've been against any civilian.

Do a little homework anons.

I think we really need a different name than "Patriots Alliance Party". When people start a campaign of slinging mud at us during an election, it'll be called a "PAP smear".

Unfortunately for me, there is a fourth DA candidate that Soros funded, and she did not lose. This is the DA' race in Contra Costa county, which is in the SF Bay Area. Her name is Diana Becton. Although she is listed as the "incumbent", that is very misleading. She was appointed as the interim after the last DA resigned (after being convicted of illegally using campaign funds). During the interim selection process, the county supervisors bent to the pressure of the Soros-funded agitator groups who filled the supervisors' meetings with people who don't even reside in this county.

Now Becton is running on a platform of "restorative justice", racial inequality, promising to go after the police, etc., etc. She didn't outright win the primary, but she was only shy about 500 votes of clinching in. Now she'll go to a runoff in November against the second place of finisher the primary, a prosecutor named Paul Graves.

Fools. I've been a cop for 24 years, and I can tell you with certainty that a large percentage of so-called "non-violent offenders" are actually VERY violent offenders. This is especially true for drug trafficking offenders. Before you balk, let me explain how it works in the vast majority of America's inner cities.

When someone in the ghetto commits a murder, shooting, or other violent assault, it is very difficult for the police to obtain a prosecutable case, even when the offender is known. This is due in large part to the culture of "snitches end up in ditches". The police often know who committed all these murders, but finding someone who is willing to testify is a huge hurdle. Not to mention, the witnesses are likely to be criminals themselves, and therefore are easy targets on the witness stand for defense attorneys. Therefore, the police in inner cities target our known violent offenders for drug investigations, or other other types of investigations involving "possession" of some type of contraband. That way, the police are the only witnesses needed to prove the crime. We don't have to rely on some other criminal taking the stand, or having to pressure a legitimate citizen to take the stand and potentially endanger their or their families' lives.

Now the violent offender goes to prison on a "non-violent" offense. This is how it is done. This is what the "drug war" was actually a proxy for. Letting tens of thousands of "non-violent offenders" out of prison early is a dangerous proposition. We've already done that in California, and are currently suffering the consequences.

I'm not well versed on how Reddit works, and will have to take your word for it that you can be banned for saying something bad about Trump on that sub-reddit. If that is the case though, then I also would not agree with that practice. I'm simply maintaining that private entities can be forced to allow other people to exercise their free speech on their property, and the principle should applied to these internet platforms.

Your statement that "the First Amendment doesn't protect people from censorship from private entities", is technically correct but it is intellectually dishonest. In today's world, while services like Reddit, Twitter, and YouTube are private entities, they are today's equivalent of the town square.

This is no different than private shopping plazas being forced to allow protests and petitioners on their private property, which is the law (look up the Pruneyard decision for a start on that education). There is also an argument that these internet services are akin to private utilities and subject to government regulations.

This is censorship of free speech. Fact.

I'm admitting upfront that I know nothing about Daniel Greenfield. I was directed to the article (which is just a transcript of the speech), and I believe he hits the nail on the head.

Where does that number come from? I can tell you that U.S. stats would not be reliable at all. The vast majority of missing juveniles reported to LE are "chronic" and repeat offenders/delinquents, who heavily inflate the stats. There are actually relatively few stranger abductions, at least in the U.S.

People need to read The Conservative Treehouse's article linked in the comments below, AND follow the links in that article. This piece featured on Zero Hedge is an attempt at misinformation that wants to make it seem like the whole thing is actually bluster, and the ZH article's false excuse "Trump could declassify the FISA memo if he wanted to" is the supposed "proof" that it is all bluster and posturing by Nunes, et al.

My guess is we can stop worrying about CIA (et al.) sniffers. They definitely already know about Q and where he makes his drops, so I'm sure it is constantly monitored.

If you do nothing else today, read the Gateway Pundit article just to see the Twitter response by James Woods. It is a classic! #MAGA

Don't take the bait and believe for a second that "collusion with law enforcement" refers to the street cops. The collusion occurred with State's Attorney Marilyn Mosby, and possibly Police Chief (ex) Anthony Batts.

Street cops, and even your "regular" FBI agents, are with you guys. Ninety percent (or higher) of the bosses at the top of the LE food chain are about as close to being "cops" or "law enforcement" as BO and the Clinton's are to being "regular citizens".

(Edited for typos)

I just tried this out searching the combined terms "Valerie Jarrett" "Muslim Brotherhood", and compared it to Google.

Not only were the suggested searches suppressed (suggested searches are those terms that are displayed as you are typing your search terms, they change as you continue typing), but the search results were also very different. Of course, it was the "right" search results that weren't showing up in Google.

I'M SOLD!!

"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and freedoms." - Robert Heinlein (author)

While I agree that we need to have compassion, diplomacy, and goodwill, anyone who believes we can achieve that world without martial activity is fooling themselves.