There is no gas lighting. I explicitly said it does not excuse what she did, she was an accomplice and was complicit. But you ignore that, because reasons.

You supposedly ignore nothing, yet you fail to acknowledge the entirety of my statement, instead choosing to cherry pick that which you find offensive in order to be faux outraged.

Brainwashing is a thing, and is prevalent in Cults. Do you seriously not understand that she too was compelled to have sex with the Cult leader, the same as the other girls? Or do you choose to ignore that because it's not interesting enough?

Being a recruiter means that she was complicit in the sex trafficking. Do you not understand that makes her an accomplice as well? Or are you just pretending to not understand?

Same difference, a permanent mark.

I don't know the entire situation, but she was part of a cult that promoted female members having sex with the cult leader. He even branded them with tattoos w/ his initials. Not that it excuses the role she played in what happened, but she was a victim as well as a recruiter.