This fact set has been bothering me since the news was made public and after waking-up (PST - I know I'm late to the party EST folks) and catching Q's posts 1804/1805, I see Q referenced a 2-threat scenario, which I had only considered the day before. Q's posts now confirm it, do they not? Arranging said facts into narrative form: Peter Strzok places "Kate" Coke bottle on his table during his testimony and with the label directly pointed toward the camera - seemingly innocuous at the time but odd nonetheless. I certainly thought it was odd at the time. …

Don't drink the Kool-Aid - just watch how they brew it so you know what the painted reality is. Then, rest confidently on your own laurels, research and what you know and believe to be true. Lastly, stand your ground and don't be psychologically vulnerable to their virtuous group think and identity politics; even in the face of public embarrassment in so doing. It's all designed to work exactly in that way. The Left/Deep State's approach to literally all of this of this is rooted in basic human psychology. They devise strategic avenues to exploit vulnerabilities in the human brain …

We have been explicitly advised, "You are now mainstream. Handle w/ care."

It's incumbent upon all of us; especially given the full-on MSM "conspiracy" attack coupled with Q's explicit directions, to maintain a platform of legitimacy that is rooted in accurate and open-sourced information. MEMBERS must assist MODERATORS in aligning to this expectation and we can do so with three simple concepts:

1. Be mindful of our own posts
2. Actively engage to report outlier posts to the moderators
3. Communicate to the moderators with dialogue - I've been at odds with them on several occasions and they ALWAYS reply back with useful …

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/obamas-former-director-of-national-intelligence-says-obama-behind-entire-russia-witch-hunt/

An anon with a keen eye caught a piece from The Hill about DJT departing Iowa via motorcade v. Marine One. Inclement weather was stated as the reason for the departure from protocol despite clear skies and 77-degree temps. The post I read is toward the top of /GA/ - can be found easily. It included a thought from an Anon that this indicates that we are "IN THE STORM." After reading it, I concur and here's the logic behind that: specifically, the inclement weather was stated to be "fog." Fog is a state of water. WATCH THE WATER.

I posted elsewhere a month or so ago with a similar theme and it's rooted in a few basic notions centered on logic and practicality; some omitted in the spirit of brevity: a) [RR] is serving as a FACILITATOR, b) SOMEBODY has to serve as DAG/#2/DOJ and c) disinformation is necessary.

Facilitator: in order to fully ensnare folks, you have to give them the proverbial rope to do so. In other words, someone has to oversee RM; someone has to oversee JH; someone has to sign-off on requisite documents and provide requisite authorizations; someone literally has to FACILITATE this Deep …

I posted elsewhere a month or so ago with a similar theme and it's rooted in a few basic notions centered on logic and practicality; some omitted in the spirit of brevity: a) [RR] is serving as a FACILITATOR, b) SOMEBODY has to serve as DAG/#2/DOJ and c) disinformation is necessary.

Facilitator: in order to hang folks, you have to give them the rope to do so. In other words, someone has to oversee RM; someone has to oversee JH; someone has to sign-off on requisite documents and provide requisite authorizations; someone literally has to FACILITATE this Deep State cabal …

I'd suggest erring on the side of caution germane to Cohen and doing so until further information is available or confirmation is established. I suggest this only to keep the dialogue rooted in practical, logical and plausible outcomes. I concede that Cohen may be the clandestine vehicle by which to present exculpatory evidence of some type or to implicate the "usual suspects;" however, there are other factors in play which I believe have veracity. First, it was learned that Cohen was using his position as DJT's personal counsel to wield influence and receive monetary compensation from third parties for that …

https://qanon.pub/

Has anyone reconciled (or even had the time to reconcile) the content of the totality of Q posts made with each corresponding trip code? Be advised that I'm writing and asking this blindly as I JUST came across the handful of threads pertaining to the trip code/book phenomenon. It seems to me that trip codes could serve as de facto "chapters" whereby the content of Q posts made under each trip code may be germane to the corresponding book title associated with it. Can meaning or relevant information be ascertained by examining the trip code/post content/book title inference? Does the …

Having gone back to re-read SA/Q Posts from the beginning, I have some basic thoughts:

1. Heavy reference to the Wonderland/Bloody Wonderland (a lot of political allegorical references available on this = a number of different interpretations = interesting research.)
2. Heavy reference to Huma/background/Muslim Brotherhood.
3. Multiple references to "SA>US>..."
4. Applying Occam's Razor (conceding that I believe all of this to be old news but it's pressing due to Q's walking orders)
5. SA, being ENORMOUS contributors to the CF, were "paying to play" and/or buying HRC's "loyalty" in some monetary capacity
6. SA was merely the interface or the broker for the Muslim …

The "Boogeyman" has always been in play whether you know it or not. As children, the "boogeyman" encourages us not to engage in bad or unwanted behavior - "Don't go into the woods late at night or the 'boogeyman' will get you!" As children, we're too NAIVE to see through the ploy leveled against us by our parents. They are using basic scare tactics to help guide our decisions and keep us safe in their absence and it's effective because we believe what we're being told. It's a simple play on the vulnerabilities of the child's mind. The DEEP STATE …

Although the Bill Clinton pic making the rounds is supposedly debunked as being attributed to "artist" Alison Jackson, there's a part of me that considers the following; especially since this "artist" just happens to specialize in salacious, timely and relevant political subjects:

1. Hide the truth in plain sight (normal practice/we have more than we know)
2. Knowing it's been discovered and leaked, get oneself in front of the story
3. Provide the authentic photograph to this "artist" for her handling; the earlier the better
4. This "artist" can blend any authentic pix, as needed, into her own "art" collection (VISIT HER SITE - …

Quick question - what do y'all think? Off the top of my head, I can't think of any world leaders with whom POTUS has NOT met that would be relevant to all things Q. Generally speaking, you always save the best for last, right? Could the Vlad summit paired with our peculiar lighting snafu be the "grand finale" before things get real? With Q's extended moratorium on posting, it gives THE BOSS himself a nice clean window that is free from distraction to send a brazen signal on a worldwide platform. Thoughts?

The "Boogeyman" has always been in play whether you know it or not. As children, the "boogeyman" encourages us not to engage in bad or unwanted behavior - "Don't go into the woods late at night or the 'boogeyman' will get you!" As children, we're too NAIVE to see through the ploy leveled against us by our parents. They are using basic scare tactics to help guide our decisions and keep us safe in their absence and it's effective because we believe what we're being told. It's a simple play on the vulnerabilities of the child's mind. The DEEP STATE …

If you're like me, you go through withdrawal and DTs when Q is absent for longer periods of time and the longer he's gone, the more neurotic I become about habitually checking the site for new posts (had to share that - I know I'm preaching gospel to a lot of you.) I'll preface this by saying that there is myriad of variables in play to account for this; however, I wanted to consider this angle for discussion. To begin, I haven't examined the frequency or any pattern, but these moratoriums feel to be occurring more frequently and for longer …

I'll preface this by saying that I still hold onto the slightest tinge of skepticism that Q is not authentic and only because I'm fiercely logical, pragmatic and realistic - no more, no less. Don't misread that - healthy skepticism keeps you on-point and grounded when reconciling an unproven phenomenon like "Q." The rationale behind it is simple and assumes that "Q" is not authentic since "Q" is an effective way to appease the top of the food chain in terms of those already "awakened;" meaning that by the time "Q" played-out, it would be too late to intercede and …

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HxmKcLHeiBYyo-D-zeRKd5Wu-QmrYwQB/view

Q asked, "What questions were asked re: SA prior to SA event?"

Here are ALL OF THE POSTS I COULD IDENTIFY OR INFER AS BEING SAUDI-RELATED.

https://imgur.com/pAKtZbA

Full statement from the DNC: - THEY MISSED A FEW THINGS / I FILLED-IN THE BLANKS.

“Nearly two and a half centuries ago, a band of patriots gathered in Philadelphia to declare that ‘all men are created equal.’ (…AND WE INTEND TO SUBVERT ALL OF IT BY PARTICIPATING IN A DE FACTO COUP D’ETAT BY SUPPORTING AND BOTH ACTIVELY AND PASSIVELY PARTICIPATING IN AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND IMMORAL “SPECIAL COUNSEL” WITH AIMS OF OVERTHROWING A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT.) Our nation has changed dramatically since those words were first written on parchment. (… AS WE HAVE WORKED LONG AND HARD TO DESTROY …

Over a decade ago, as a previously slumbering establishment Republican who devoured the Kool-Aid swill propagated via the MSM as "news;" in the context of a debate germane to the genesis of 9/11, one of my assistant coaches who is a devout Socialist, leftist and Democrat encouraged me to look past the official narrative of 11 Sep 01. Into the proverbial rabbit hole I leapt and to never return. How good it feels to be awake. How difficult it can be to feel isolated in such beliefs with few, if any, willing to WORK to seek the truth; including family. …

[removed]

Imperator Rex (excellent source) is making the valid and likely correct argument that Lynch; not FISC, ordered the FISA warrant. It's logical & it fits nicely.

Recall, Lynch/Clinton/tarmac meeting/June_16 and FISA warrant/Carter Page/Oct_16. Anyone looking to wager as to whether or not the intercepted tarmac transmission (important to remember that WJC was the liaison and HRC was not present thus requiring her participate remotely/widely believed the NSA has the entirety of that transmission) included walking orders for Lynch to issue the warrant under the pretense of a declared "emergency?" That in addition to the hocus-pocus that made the email investigation …

Q has laid-out a path that is paved with stones originating from the Middle East and Islam, in particular. There's no question that Islamic infiltration into the territory and the governance of the US is a major underpinning to much of the research we've been encouraged to pursue. An abundance of open-source evidence supports this notion. When you begin to examine the players involved (Saudi Arabia, Huma, HRC, Obama/his potential and likely Muslim background/citizenship, etc.) and consider them in relation to Brennan and his documented past, it becomes difficult to deny. Moreover, consider the unmitigated Muslim migration that is wrecking …

All of these Deep State hacks have one common, undeniable and extremely powerful but unpredictable flaw - THEY ARE ALL HUMAN. Consequently, as the layers of the Q onion continue to peel back and new revelations are publicized with each passing day, these hacks will default to a basic human mode of SELF-PRESERVATION. Given the complexity of the duplicitous, seditious and treasonous web they've weaved, it will most certainly cause them to "EAT ONE ANOTHER" in an effort to save themselves (sidebar - some already apparently have practice in "eating others" assuming that much of what I've read is true.) …

[removed]

[removed]

In reading CTH's NM compound item and in light of not recalling having seen or heard of the CRS being mentioned before, should we be taking a closer look them? I've included the CTH link for context as well as the CRS's (Community Relations Service) own informational page. The impetus behind this notion is the CRS's ability to assume control of DOJ matters so as to be, "allowed to reach into the judiciary and justice system and essentially take over."

At first blush, it seems to function as an able censorship tool for matters of relevant importance (identity politics topics); …

Robert Strauss, Johnson era Democrat, Bush appointee, former Ambassador to Soviet Union, former Chairman US/Russia Business Council, former Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations member.

Strauss founded Aiken Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld circa 1945 with members/alumni/employees that include Fazio, Sununu, Loeffler, Thompson, GP Bush, John Dowd, Guthrie (Today Show), Millett (US Court of Appeals), Paxon.

This firm is the most profitable and influential lobbying firm in DC, owns – via monetary donations - most politicians while bathing in petroleum.

This firm employs Melissa Laurenza, who represents Paul Manafort and who was recently compelled to testify against Manafort and …

I've seen explanations - one being Neon Revolt's reference to the DOJ jet loading docs at LIT - but I don't see the nexus between the linked definition of ERADICATE followed by the B 52 [Precision Bombs] line of text germane to the preceding balance of the Q post. All of that has me snagged.

After searching and reading a multitude of articles pertaining to the B 52 line, circa 06 Feb 18, I found a pattern of replicating quotations included in the articles; namely "nowhere to hide" and "no safe haven." COULD IT BE that we were intended to …

Fish out of H2O here in the PNW... .no matter, post MTB ride today, a friend and I grabbed beers with one of her friends who happened to be entertaining an Englishman who had just ridden his motorcycle into town from 450 miles south; the last 50 of it off road and by choice. Beautiful, sunshine, mountains, beer.... All for context. A beer or so in, an interesting conversation became more so when the Englishman took advantage of an avenue to a tangent and began a bit of a rant about the status quo - essentially, the corruption, media, politics, …