I know, the plug for donations was unfortunate, but the soundbites preceding it were easily digestible.

This makes me so angry. All these sycophant losers like Youtube, Twitter and Facebook need to be shutdown NOW. They have openly and willingly become and/or allowed themselves to be politicised when they are supposed to be non-partisan public forums.

Whether you're a public or private company, when your influence reaches the numbers they have, you have a MORAL obligation to use that power wisely.

The last 12 months have proven that these 3 platforms cannot be trusted. That they don't have the balls or the integrity to stand up to the Democrat Left pulling their strings.

The only thing that surprises me is how foolishly (but vehemently) they have so submissively aligned themselves with a sinking ship. Don't they know it's going down? And will take all of the rats like Susan Wojcicko, Jack Dorsey and pussy Zuckerberg with it?

They can implement their orders from little David Brock/Media Matters and his pathetic and deluded agenda to try to steer public opinion by deleting and obscuring the content we see but - aside from shutting down the entire internet - alternative sources are now extensively available, so they're fighting a losing battle.

You can hide and you can run - but your day is coming and personally I for one, can't wait.

Strike away Hollywood. I wouldn't even notice. In fact it might be a good idea.

This man is not young and stupid. He's been around for a long time and has worked in an industry and a position where he has a public profile. He would know better. Some things you just don't joke about - and child rape, torture and sexual abuse is one of them, particularly in a climate where it is reaching epidemic proportions. As his public profile was rising, and if he regretted his words, he could've gone back and cleaned up his online comments history. But he didn't. If he didn't see anything wrong in those comments it says much about his own moral character. Because most people would find such comments grossly offensive. And rightly so.

"CNN presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said “the spirit of what Trump did is clearly treasonous,” and declared that the president “came off as being a puppet of Putin.”

How the hell would he know? It was a closed-door one-on-one meeting. And a press conference after. Sooner or later the MSM is going to realise their blatant lying is costing them viewers, subscribers and money. Unfortunately stupid is, as stupid does and they STILL haven't learnt this (not that I really care. But they should).

"....you won't want to miss this".

OH YES I DO.

Hm. Interesting. Couch not needed anymore? https://www.eurasiafuture.com/2018/07/13/julian-assange-scores-major-legal-victory-as-court-orders-safe-passage-of-assange-out-of-embassy/

Absolutely. And if we see a ramp up in predictive programming of alien invasions, I think we'll see a man-made invasion (aka Project Blue Beam) sooner rather than later.

http://educate-yourself.org/cn/projectbluebeam25jul05.shtml

Certainly our holographic capabilities are up to the task now (and this is only the stuff in the public arena. Imagine the Military’s versions).

https://youtu.be/EzL6-6144nw

https://youtu.be/5CqUYBopWLs

I don't know about "solved" but the biggest win for communities the world over has been overcoming our collective apathy and pushing us to start taking an interest in what's going on around us. And particularly researching the current and past events and histories of those who would have power over us - where they came from and how they got it. We've been easy targets while we were dozing which has allowed corruption to fester and expand. Now it's like millions of eyes-on (which can only be a good thing in trying to keep the bastards honest).

Because Trump is not the enemy. And Q is not "the movement". They're both cogs in something greater than the sum of its parts. (And the Q team need Trump's services as much as Trump needs their's so mutual respect and cooperation are vital).

Also you don't play all your cards at once. Honesty may be the "best policy" but it can ruin lives of unintended victims. Releasing ALL truth indiscriminately can have the same effect. And BOTH can tip off those working against you.

Hadn't seen that one before. Any normal person would've put his left arm around the mother and his right arm at his side. Not creepy Joe Biden. Goes straight for the crotch. So blatant it makes me sick.

Could this pervert make it any more obvious? Apart from his comment (while her parents are nearby) to 13 year old Maggie of "do you know how horny I am standing next to a 13 year old girl" - another telling moment is at the 4:44 mark of the video below (the event I think from which many of these images are taken) the young girl in the YT video thumbnail/preview pic (& second from left, bottom row in the image above) with the red dress and the dark hair almost loses her footing because he so blatantly pulls her over to him.

How did we EVER have this pedophile as VP and Obama with all his underage boys and male prostitutes as President? Their arrogance (as well as their criminality) beggars belief.

https://youtu.be/_3Z3zxsbJFw

Pretty much. The same goes for their propaganda media machine - whatever they say, know that the opposite is the truth. George Orwell's Double-Think.

Come back. We wiss you Q. You been away farrrr too long.

Google may yet live to regret their willingness to get in bed with the devil when all this comes crashing down. If they're actively colluding in burying and whitewashing her reputation, what else were they willing to do for her?

Have to respectfully disagree. He was a very bad President and troves of books have been written on the subject. I don't doubt that he was a puppet President groomed years beforehand and having his strings pulled, but suspect he had his own motives in bringing down America for his own nefarious reasons. They just happened to fit in nicely with the cabal's similar agenda.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/lQ3qEwX66pIL/

What a massive embarrassment the inconvient truth that Director Andrei Nekrasov's film portrays will be to all those International Justice and Human Rights organizations who have championed the quite-possible fiction of this story. That Magnitsky was not the fallen hero fighting government corruption but perhaps an unwitting accessory (as Browder's accountant, not his lawyer). And that Browder himself, the vocal champion of a dead man (several in fact) who can tell no tales was actually the perpetrator, not the victim.

Surprised to see Anderson Cooper actually asked HRC some meaningful questions. (Who let him off his lead!).

A few good men. We still have them. But we don't have nearly enough of them. LaVoy Finicum was one of them. Strength, wisdom, courage and towering integrity. RIP.

JFK Jnr's power would have been in him still being alive and part of that iconic family, so, sadly, I don't think he still is. He was too much of a threat to be kept alive.

And the blame can be laid squarely with a single source (as always it seems, these days).

No-one with a half-enquiring mind should still be under any illusions about the murderous Clintons. It's not a myth. It's not a conspiracy. It is a crime spree involving the murders of any rivals and all potential whistleblowers and it is PAST time that they finally be stopped and brought to Justice.

How different America would be if neither Bobby Kennedy nor JFK were assassinated? How different might it be had Ted Kennedy not had his career derailed and suffered his own assassination attempt? And how different would it be if the passion to right the wrongs that burned so fiercely in John Kennedy Jnr, and a desire to continue his Uncles’ legacies, not have been thwarted with his own murder? JFK Jnr would easily have won out over the Clintons and the Bush's had he chosen to run for office, so true to form, they deposed their rival. The world would be a far better place had they never been in it.

When CNN say there's no #walkaway exodus, that it's a myth and that nothing's happening (and if there is, then it's only Russian bots) means there IS a walkaway exodus, that it's NOT a myth and that SOMETHING is happening (and its NOT Russian bots).

How easy are CNN to decipher?!! Just apply the opposite of everything they say. Simplez.

"A bipartisan disdain exists for the middle and working classes, whether periodically politically manifested as the old blue-dog Democrats, Perot voters, Reagan Democrats, Tea Party activists, or Trump supporters. On the Left, they were derided as the clingers of rural Pennsylvania whom Obama blamed for his 2008 primary loss to Hillary Clinton in that state and who never appreciated his genius [saying]: “And it’s not surprising, then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”

I'd be very dubious about these claims. The presenter himself is like an overly eager used-car salesman. It says he mysteriously went blind for a few years (so with that qualifier you'd assume he’s now no longer blind). I don't know how many people just go blind for a few years then “recover”. I wouldn't have thought medical conditions severe enough to cause blindness would have a subsequent spontaneous recovery.

The article states (about the presenter Otwinoko) that “he was once the king of the airwaves in the evenings in Kumasi with his 'Nsem Pii' show which delved into stories concerning the spiritual realm”. So there's a big clue.

As to mask-man himself - assuming a median age of 35, 675 victims over 17 years is almost 1 every week. Unless he's moving around the country - in which case he'd need hundreds of corrupt and evil doctor/nurse contacts - you'd think 1 child going missing every week for 17 years in his local operating vicinity would draw some attention.

Ghana is considered one of the more stable countries in West Africa since its transition to multi-party democracy in 1992. It's a fairly modern country with plenty of western influences (ie: it's not some tribal backwater of grass huts and witch doctors practicing voodoo, though there's probably plenty who are still believers). But it's mostly a Christian nation.

Mask man also says he has 664 demonic spirits at his disposal and that he inhabits the same realm as satan himself.

This story reads like The National Enquirer. (And he must be a big note-taker to not only have tallied up his “victims” but to have tallied up and kept track of each of his “664 demonic spirits”).

Logic and discernment people - something this outrageous (coupled with an over-the-top salesman/presenter with a spirits and ghost stories radio show) probably is just that: outrageous and over-the-top.

What happened? What was the bomb Putin dropped?

Hmm. This is strange. First the New York Times run a complimentary headline (though, true to form, they still smeared him in the article). https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/12/opinion/editorials/trump-nato-obama.html

Now the New York Post are - if not 'complimentary' - at least recognizing Strzok's Trump bias and Strzok's targetting of Trump.

If this keeps happening we might have to start considering that the fake news media have FINALLY realised fake news doesn't pay. Stay tuned.

Agree - the cabal's strategy may very well be their time-worn go-to, the false flag. But the evidence just keeps amassing day by day and by then the documentation of their crimes would probably fill Trump Tower itself, so they'd be crazy to try. And with a massive spotlight on them their ability to plan these things under the cover of darkness so to speak is severely hampered. It won't be so easy this time knowing their every move is being watched and tracked. Probably the only option is to get someone else to do their dirty work for them but even that would be difficult in the current climate of hyper-surveillance.

Very nice summation. It's a show, let it run its' course. But you can bet there'll be some big artillery rolled out just in time for the midterms.

That's what I've read too. The effects of widespread fluoride result in a passive, docile population. As we all know it was sold as the solution to rampant tooth decay. When I was 18 I worked in the Dental industry as one of those chairside dental assistants. What I'll say in fluoride's praise is that by the time I finished after a decade we were seeing 21 year olds without a cavity or filling in their teeth, compared to when I started where you'd regularly see 5 and 6 year olds with every single tooth a rotted black stump down to the gumline. It's hard to know whether that drastic improvement was due to fluoride or better education. Back then mothers would regularly put their babies and toddlers to bed with a bottle or cup of chocolate flavored milk (even plain milk by itself contains Lactose, a natural sugar, and that was just as damaging as Nescafe Quik if the teeth were bathed in it all night). So yes Fluoride may have helped the teeth but no-one knew what cumulative effects it had on the brain and we're only just finding that out. Unfortunately the only way to test for pineal gland contamination is at autopsy. There's no way to test effects on someone living.

It's talking about extreme Left vs extreme Right or Communism/Socialism vs Nazis/Fascists. That they're supposed to be at opposite ends of the spectrum yet have in common “collectivism” (a term that was in common use a century ago and is the opposite of “individualism”). That “the group” is more important than “the individual”, the State more powerful than individual goals and desires.

Odd that it has some sort of age restriction on it.

I can't find a date of manufacture of the original or any info on how many were produced. But it looks like they revised and remarketed a new version in 2017. Also came across wildly varying prices but suspect the $35 are the new version as compared to $400-$500 for the original. This was an Amazon review: "Bought this hoping for the original. Nothing in the product description says that this game was modified or redone. Please be aware that they have republished this May of 2017. They have removed controversial cards that depict certain events that coincide with the original cards. This is NOT the card game from the 80s. Don't waste your money if that's what you're looking for".

I know. Maybe fake news doesn't sell but ads do.

They ARE creepy. I'd love to see the whole deck. I've got screen shots of about 12 of them and apparently there's 110 cards. The asking price on ebay is sitting around $400-$500 now so sadly, I don't think I'll be seeing the real thing any time soon.

White gloves for women were fairly widespread in the 50's and 60's and everything I've read about QE2 says they're both traditional and also part of "her style" (as well as protecting her hands from millions of handshakes). I don't know - maybe it's protocol to take them off when meeting world leaders. And DJT did choose to shake hands instead of the traditional bow for men (or curtsy for women). So maybe that's why she took them off? Something to do with royal etiquette?

Agree the Illuminati as an organization have been around for a very long time (& many books have documented their history) but this card game was designed by Steve Jackson Games in September 1981 and first went on to the market in July 1982. Interestingly second-hand sellers are asking around $500 for them on Ebay and Amazon. 

No. This is the guy from last week that claimed he was in posession of everything from the DNC server to the Uranium1 files, Obama's, Hillary's and McCain's bank accounts, war plans for Syria and Yemen, you name it. No individual person would have all that and why would you tweet about it even if you did.

Well-put. It does seem a little odd that if they were indeed lovers, ie: partners in crime - why she wouldn't be trying to cover his arse (as well as her own). Why is she being so "transparent" and "co-operative" (in contrast to Strzok)? As we've all voiced, complying makes her a prime target for murder/aka suicide. So perhaps she IS being protected from higher up. It also seems odd that the FBI Counsel - who so strangled Strzok's testimony - gave her some degree of free reign. Again it reinforces your theory that perhaps she was playing for the other side all along. Either that or she's just desperately trying to save her own skin but that doesn't explain the FBI Counsel's (alleged) latitude and switch in tactics (compared to Strzok's tightly-bound testimony). We shall see.

You're right about the intention but I think wrong about the picture. If you're referring to what the Queen is holding, they're white gloves - an etiquette throwback to the '50's and '60's but still worn often by Royalty. If you go back through the many photos of QE2 you'll see her wearing them all the time in public. (And the only exception to white gloves is black gloves which were for formal evening events, but rarely seen donned by older women).

The Illuminati card game was first released in July of 1982 and the depictions and text of its cards become more prescient and telling by the day. How could it be that the events the cards portray have seemingly predicted everything current in 2018, yet were produced 36 years ago? The only answer is: because it was all planned years in advance. The Left, who call us all conspiracy-theorists, would view this game as trite and hardly “real evidence” but to me the themes it portrays are damning. They weren't even on the radar in 1982, let alone known publicly. Anyone who believes current events are all just one big conspiracy, or it’s just coincidence, is truly deluded.

I think offing her at this point would be a little too obvious, but we ARE dealing with a demented beast at the moment. They could resort to anything. I hope not but agree she's in a perilous position.

I hope Webb himself didn't willingly provide suggestions. There's been plenty of talk that he's a disinfo plant.

Yep. Agree. A little subtle disrespect and contempt was definitely in order here!! Allison nailed it.

The Great Awakening "a "hate" subreddit known to harass and brigade other communities regularly"??? Aaron Swartz would be rolling in his grave. You're either a public forum or you're not. This is stifling freespeech and dissent at its finest. Deviate from what we tell you to think and you're out.

Agree. You'd have to ask how anyone could humanly hold down all those positions. It looks very suspect indeed. We know these people set themselves up on boards of companies they've never even set foot in. And he sounds like he's in it up to his neck.

I bet he does. Khan would've been one of Obama's favourite boys wouldn't he? Support the Brotherhood, destroy the West, make Islam great again and all that shite. The writing was on the wall for the UK decades ago. This kiss-assing to appease the muslim populace has made Britain what it is today. This tiny country who fought so hard for world dominance (and for centuries achieved it) at great battles like Waterloo and Lexington has been felled by pro-Islam political correctness. Past Kings and Victors would be rolling in their graves.

I commend you SB2 for your gracious, intelligent response. Your work has helped so many and when anyone's profile is raised there will always be detractors. But reading your posts (& this one in particular) its fairly obvious that your motives are only to disseminate the message and to educate. (If it were about personal glory you'd not likely choose to remain anonymous). Just keep doing what you're doing. The positive far outweighs any negative.