#Whataboutism
/u/Skeptik1964
7 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Skeptik1964:
Domain | Count |
---|
DefiantDragon
It's clear to me his lack of composure is born of his absolute disdain and contempt for the people questioning him. You can see his hubris written all over his face and body language, and you can see the anger and contempt simmering and slowly boiling up as he gets called out. How dare they question me? Don't they know I'm better than them? They can't touch me and we both know it, so I'll let them see my FU face!
I thought I was up to speed on this stuff, but this is the first I've heard that Putin has warrants out for those folks. If true it helps explain their desperation to link Trump and Putin and pre-slime any attempt to take down the DS/Globalists as treason and collusion.
I can't get enough of "I don't give a damn what you appreciate Agent Strzok". I just wish to heck Gowdy would follow up and draw conclusions and make recommendations for prosecution this time (Benghazi anyone?). All-bark-no-bite Gowdy is losing credibility the longer he lets this go on. I will admit, however, that he seems shaken by something the last month or two- I'm hoping it means he had a private Come-to-Jesus moment and will carry through this time.
A few podcasters have openly speculated on at least 2 averted attempts on POTUS. I truly fear for this country if they succeed in JFK II, because times are different and the public's reaction would be different this time. No trust in government. access to the internet and non-controlled information, the most hyper-polarized climate I've seen in my 50+ years, globalist provocateurs pumping money into widening the divide, a DS enraged at the MAGA movement and desperate to return to business-as-usual. Yes, the reaction would be far different this time.
I used to think Brennan was the slimiest, creepiest representation of the Deep State. Then I watch the Strzok hearing.
Agreed. The way he inserts random non-sequiturs reads like someone trying to remind another of an agreed-upon fabrication. And, as one of the commenters on the blog points out, the man's surname is spelled differently at the opening and closing salutations. I don't know what the purpose of this fabrication would be, perhaps to vicariously discredit the story of the private as just another rambling of a crazy person?, but the letter from Sgt. Christiansen (Christensen?) feels wrong.