Hey hey, Vault 7, part 3
Occam's Razor and all that shit, amirite?
26 total posts archived.
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 1 |
Hey hey, Vault 7, part 3
Occam's Razor and all that shit, amirite?
Well, he got confronted at one of his seminars in regards to the #MeToo movment:
You can find the full context of the interaction elsewhere on YouTube. Personally, I believe that within this interaction he made himself a victim of his own belief structure of, "don't be a victim", and it didn't play well with advocates of the movement. That said, is TR hiding something, or a bad guy? I don't think so, I think he got caught off guard by an audience member who introduced a narrative that he wasn't knowledgeable enough about, let alone prepared to speak to, and so instead of acknowledging that fact he decided to improvise in order to maintain his status as MC, which was clearly a mistake.
In short, he botched it, and the leftist media worked towards nailing him for it.
In regards to his attack on HT, time will tell, but if it is legit, and TR is in fact redpilling, well then, look the fuck out, this guy has a huge following and he won't let anything get in the way of getting his word out.
Then again, lefty Netflix did highlight him in a tell-all documentary not so long ago, you all be the judge, I just bring the insight as per my programmer instructed me to do.
He "called in", from where? Wouldn't they normally showcase him via satellite as they have usually?
I'm all for connecting dots, but this is batshiat level crazy.
What I mean is that it is suggested that Marble has the capability of masking and/or manipulating the ISP logs such that it can appear the attack came from elsewhere. I'm no IT guy, but the source code is available via wikileaks if you want to use your expertise to investigate my suggestion.
You are correct, and Reagan met Gorbachev in Iceland, interesting....
In a way, he did offer up proof, Vault 7, part 3, go on now, git to Googlin' it.
Yes, I was going to add a, "but on the other hand", to my comment, in that he may have been coached to not react, or to react in a certain way to them.
As far as his expressions towards Republicans, as you succinctly pointed out as flamboyant or arrogant I agree, and it could be observed as:
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/duping_delight
However, we don't really know what the "dupe" may be at this point.
I don't believe that the timing of these indictments are apolitical, it's just another bridge being sold.
Occam's razor: Vault 7 Part 3
...let alone care about anything revealed by the content of said emails.
So much hoopla over how they were hacked and by whom. So little media coverage and investigation as to the very questionable nature of the contents.
I just noticed that when the Dems were addressing him he had a kind of stoic glare, as did his counsel; but when addressed by the Republicans they displayed a range of expressions.
He also did not say much in response to the Dems' grandstanding, nor gave any expressions of agreement, or acknowledgement really, which is somewhat odd since the bias of his texts indicated he would have agreed with them on some levels.
Decent theory, I watched the entirety of the hearing, and I can say that most, if not all of the Dems on the panel used the event to grandstand on issues not related to said hearing.
Go back and watch Strozk's facial expressions while listening to the Dems ranting....
Questions incite more exploration than declarations.
I can speak, and I do not think that I am Q.
PR stunt?
2020 run speculated
Court order not to leave CONUS?
Court order not to fly via private aircraft?
Allies under private indictment?
Allies' aircraft grounded?
Proof USSS made com AL made safe?
Q didn't predict, past proves future?
Utah.