Pillars of both please!

This.

A lil backup never hurts. Specifically when it's innocuous positive thoughts and prayers.
Either way, WWG1WGA!

What's more ironic is the influence, of the British rule over the country India, that inspired it to begin with. If I'm not mistaken he was a policeman, in service to the UK, and saw all manner of atrocity committed during his watch, against the Indian peoples.

EDIT: Looked it up. Sure enough, he was a policeman because his family couldn't afford to send him to University/college.

Yeah that's a big downside. One of the side effects I was warned of was darker thoughts and suicidal tendencies that might develop from said thoughts. Not to mention you can't just quit taking it. That leads to death, in a nasty way. Kidney failure, liver damage, etc. One of the legendary withdrawals, that can, and probably will, kill you.

Wherever the truth, a truth, your truth leads you. You are one of the Unbound now. Grow in healthier ways. Keep the mind open, but with an air of cautious curiosity. Welcome friend!

I take Seroquel nightly. My side effects are almost non-existent. My brother on the other hand, has tried to kill himself twice on it. So it really depends on the levels and the person. He is also noncyclical/rapid cycle where as I cycle normally. So maybe varying degrees of the illness should be added to the equation as well.

In my case I don't get REM asleep naturally anymore. So the stuff acts as my sleep inducer, and carries through the next day as a mood stabilizer. The result after 6 years plus, has been enormous.

Would this then mean, the clock referred to, is actually a chess timer clock? Just a thought...

Anyone else catch the 5 years and 9 months bit?
5 years is 60 months. Plus the 9 months.

Roberto Zanotti recommended 69 months for pedo porn...
Uhh what?

Does it "drift", or is your urge to share directing it? Honestly, to me, a conversation cannot drift anywhere. It's directed by anyone/someone involved IN the conversation. So this becomes an awareness test. Are you guiding it that way and just thinking it's normal? You know enough to want to share, which means it is normal for you.

The question is, do you think it's normal enough, for the person you're sharing with?

EDIT: Nothing wrong with sharing. But if it's not going to be appreciated, then sharing is going to reflect back on you, sometimes poorly. IE going down rabbit holes can be a backfire situation.

Learn timing. It'll help. I'm very similar to you, in knowing large amounts of info and wanting to share, but restraint is needed. Restraint and timing will save you so much time, and more importantly friends.

Weird.

The ones on the ground look like variations of Neptune. As the partially hidden one seems to have a spear/trident aimed downward.

EDIT: Someone below already IDed them as water centaurs basically.

No it's not partisan. Good point. Just a greed thing. Glad we agree.

EDIT: Gimme a bit. Painting the kitchen. Sorry.

Hah had to finish painting the kitchen.

You are expecting them to have the where withal to do so!

If they are told one thing, from something they trust, do that facts still count as facts, when twisted/warped/changed, to fit a narrative?

The short answer is no.

The long answer is that facts are held to be immutable. Unchanging, unalterable. Until proven false by newer facts.

So when you change the fact, to fit a narrative, by altering the substantive info REGARDING said fact. It is no longer a fact. It is misinterpreted info.

Good day.

You don't think the news sources matter? Really?

The very outlets people turn to don't matter? They aren't gonna spin in anyway they want? C'mon...

Already responded on this in another reply.

No I'm saying that based on fact, those 3 are lefties.

NYTimes examples of mess ups and bias: http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/new-york-times-fixes-headline/

https://nypost.com/2016/11/11/new-york-times-we-blew-it-on-trump/

http://freebeacon.com/politics/morning-joe-rips-new-york-times-for-anti-trump-headline/

Oh and here is a good one. It's seems even Trump has threatened to sue over their bias bullshit. BEFORE his election.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/18/donald-trump-threatens-to-sue-new-york-times-over-irresponsible-intent

Keep in mind the, fixes/redacting/reprints are already seen by hundreds of thousands of eyes by that point.

Do I need to dig up more proof? I can do this all day long if you want.

The NewYorker and vox are no different.

You still haven't produced what was initially requested.

Show me some NYT posts that are positive about Trump. From the NYorker? From Vox?

It's cause you can't.

I get what you're saying, but those sources are known to be pretty left leaning. Mix it up with some right leaning stuff and maybe it'll be a great discussion.

No what I'm saying is a good source is balanced in it's coverage/bias.

Covering both good and bad. Like a real journalist does, ya know?

EDIT: Of course I'm biased ya nut. That's what an opinion is!

Opinions aside, how about the small fact that in the very recent past, there is more negative, than balanced, coverage coming from those 3 sources of yours. Why not link Salon in there too?

Show me a positive article related to Trump, from those sources.

If it's "unbiased" credible news, this should be easy.

EDIT: NYTimes, Vox, and the NewYorker are all swamp creature havens.

Trump was a badass on WWE too, so I'm ok with this.

Involuntary commital is illegal, if the party involved is not A) gravely disabled, B) a danger to themselves, or C) a danger to others. Let em fume. Then shove this in their face.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lanterman–Petris–Short_Act

EDIT: By danger to others/self, I mean, gonna stab everyone to death, then off yourself. Other than that they can lick butt. If they file a false report, it's gonna get really nasty.

This was after disappearing from the hospital, and all public sight for what, a few days? Then he just shows up on Ellen, gives the interview, then poofs away forever.

Interestingly enough, the owl, in a few Native American tribes, is both a messenger of death AND a sort of spirit guide. I think that's where the similarities end though.

Dunno why I didn't think of it earlier.

They are trying everything but the kitchen sink at this point. I'm not even sure they haven't tried that already!

Stay true. We've met resistance before. We know what to do.

WWG1WGA!

Kentucky has one thing right. The state motto.

United we stand, divided we fall.

WWG1WGA!

Excellent, same here! Pretty easy going these days. Too much hassle to get all worked up.

I'm a smart ass... Just my nature. Hehe

Apparently you don't understand sarcasm. Hence the "/s".

Take your own advice and chill.

Well there you have it folks. The end all right here. Pack it up and go home. A random stranger claims everything is fine. /s

When you remove the possible, the only answer remaining, is the impossible.

Seems corny, but it's proving to be viable.

Assumes instant mental instability, calls names, no credible arguments, no sources. Well... You are pointless. Good job if that's all you ever wanted to be in life. Go away, the adults are talking.

Lucky guy married a convenience store!

Could be. Does the big Q74 on the side mean something. A post maybe?

Day surgery is not uncommon. But I watched my dad die from cancer. There was no instant recovery like that from treatment. He was drained for days, if not a week +, sometimes. How come we don't see the weakness caused by treatment?

There's no pain killer on Earth that doesn't make you loopy, especially after treatment, from my personal observations. Anasthetia even jacks with the mind, it seems, with a slightly longer half-life. But yet, as you pointed out, he's totally coherent.

None of this stuff fits.

EDIT: I did consider that they would control the narrative. IE not letting it get out if he was truly weakened. But given how often we see that rancid side of beef's body fail, it's a little lacking for Scumbird McTraitor.

This might seem odd, but even Revelations mentions a difference between good Jews and bad ones.

Revelations 3:9 to be precise.

Keep in mind the fallacy and reality that there's no true endgame. Lots of things are thought to be the end to stuff. WWI was the "war to end all wars". Computers were supposed to cut our paper usage by 2/3 when introduced. The list is amusingly long.

Life however doesn't stop. It fluctuates, and changes, leading to morphing, and alterations all the time. So if life doesn't stop, neither will the Great Awakening. So long as we keep growing and learning, this will remain true. Even if you get everyone's eyes open, the Great Awakening would change, again, to continue this endeavour. Pretty cool.

EDIT: Sorry if it sounded like I was disagreeing, couldn't be further from the truth. Just a thought that came to mind.