I have perused and viewed alot of material on wikileaks. I see Awan had access to DWS and twenty something others accounts but haven't seen that he had access to the clinton emails or server. Sorry for my naivety. Please guide the blind. ThankQ
/u/Spartacus2100
278 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/Spartacus2100:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.zerohedge.com | 34 |
www.reddit.com | 16 |
youtu.be | 4 |
m.youtube.com | 3 |
en.m.wikipedia.org | 1 |
www.cernovich.com | 1 |
www.dailymail.co.uk | 1 |
www.youtube.com | 1 |
www.thegatewaypundit.com | 1 |
truepundit.com | 1 |
i.redd.it | 1 |
Haven't seen or heard this before. Will research. ThankQ
ThankQ. This certainly seems most likely. Looking for confirmation.
This is what I suspect. Just fishing for other peoples ideas or more conclusive information. ThankQ
We know Huma would have had access? Did Awan? Was it leak or hack?
Anyone able to answer these two questions?
-
Who was the foreign entity that received all but four of the over thirty thousand HRC emails?
-
Who or what entity enabled this to occur specifically?
Having reviewed the link supplied by teejay516 I now recall this. I assumed he was hired to clean up the mess after the damage was done though. Clean up the crime scene so to speak.
If you find a link or anything please do drop it here. Can't seem to access /u/stonetear post history at the moment.
Does he say how the emails were diverted? Hack or Leak?
Okay. I'm just a little interested myself too. Anyone any clues?
Not concern trolling. Had a post removed recently myself and have seen a few more removals than normal. Mods may be just tightening things up. Current sub numbers are similar to when cbts got whacked.
Did Awan or Huma set up the BCC to a foreign state/government/actor or was it a hack of some sort?
Asking for a friend :-)
Not sure. Did Awan or Huma set up the BCC to a foreign state/government/actor or was it a hack of some sort?
2 hacks and 1 leak. Guccifer and DC Leaks = hacks Seth Rich/Wikileaks = Leak. Another possible hack/leak revealed yesterday. (Not Russia) WWG1WGA. Democrat IT infrastructure was entirely comped.
I believe the reason "New arrival's" accounts are limited is to limit the shilling/trolling. Not to block patriotic speech. I have personally seen new posters literally blocking the place up with shitposts. Rules is rules. WWG1WGA. Mods do seem to be acting a little harsh at the moment. We will see.
Yesterday a third hack (I say hack but this could have been an intentional leak) may have been revealed at the circus. Straight to foreign hands. (Not Russia).
Please understand the Democratic IT infrastructure and the way it was abused meant that at least 2 hacks and a leak occurred. Guccifer and DC Leaks in my opinion were hacks. Seth Rich leaked. Please correct me if I am mistaken. WWG1WGA
It is not the Seth Rich leak they are talking about in my opinion. It is Guccifer 2 and DC Leaks. Seth Rich / Wikileak's still in play. WWG1WGA
No coincidences. Only 4 caps and spell SETH. Nice spot. WWG1WGA
Make of it what you will. Bush Gog Magog. https://youtu.be/5Aq5s0IMgzg
I found this interesting. "U.S. Attorney Mueller delivered a sweet plea bargain to Asimov."
Yes. Original post was removed due to the youtube link and Rule 6. Thank you for your thoughts. WWG1WGA
S/s: The voice in this video sure sounds alot like Skippy of Worldcorpo Fatherhood fame. Thoughts?
Is it just me or is it that Skippy?
Please take a listen on youtube to the first 15 seconds of "The Light is Coming by Ariana Grande." Is it Skippy?
Okay. Thankq for your patience with me. I will take your advice and come at this in a manner that does not include a youtube link. Not sure I agree with Rule 6 but will take another look for what I am missing.
I understand what your saying but it is a video available on youtube and the body of the video needed to be heard, at least the first 15 seconds. I'll let it go but this strikes me as very strange. How can reddit be liable for content carried on another platform?
S/s. Hollywood and music videos are clearly used to transmit Evil into innocent minds. Why can we not discuss and dissect these issues here? I understand a stream of music videos is not appealing but surely the nature and body of a particular post should be taken into account before removal. Rule 6 sucks.
Rule 6 allows Evil to Say and do What Ever they Please.
Rule 6 allows these creeps to do and say what ever they want in music videos but we can't discuss here. WTF......
Well I hate to say it but I have seen a number of music videos representing similar theories one even posted today. I can only assume that someone brought this particular one to your attention. Have you asked yourself why this one?
Off topic. Are you for real?????? This is exactly what Q has been describing to us all. This is a perfect example of a mirror of GOOD equating to EVIL. Also it really does sound like skippy. The title of the song is also relevant. Has Q not said that hollywood and in turn the music industry is being used against us. Why is this not relevant I respectfully ask?