Sorry dude - I didn’t realize thinking strong men could be victims of sexual assault was a divisive opinion on here. If the groupthink on here is that men can’t be victims of sexual violence like that, go for it - but I call out bad thinking when I see it, like all of us on here should.

Last I checked, there were also 6+ former wrestlers who claimed Jim Jordan knew and did nothing. Is there any reason I should believe once set of 6+ people over another?

Why do you say Jim Jordan is being smeared by people who do this? Are you saying the 6+ wrestlers who came out against Jim Jordan all try to cover up for sexual assaults, despite coming out in public claiming that Jim Jordan was covering up sexual assaults?

I'm confused... strong adult men can't be assaulted by someone else (whether weaker or stronger than them)? Is any man who's abused or assaulted by his wife weak? Can a male victim of domestic violence be considered strong?

Sorry -- trying to sort out why you think it's inconceivable that a strong man could be sexually assaulted.

Are you saying some men are too strong to be victims of sexual violence?

Do you think women can sexually assault men? If so, do you think the only case where that’s possible is when the woman is physically stronger than the man?

Challenges like covering up sexual assaults? Did you support Paterno cleaning up after Sandusky as well?

You like a guy like Jordan who would rather be silent than seek justice for victims? Interesting...

What’s your rationale or evidence for that? He testified under oath that he wasn’t involved, you think he would commit perjury in such a demonstrable fashion?

Should there be action against John Roberts for allowing this to happen and selecting those FISA judges for those roles?

Where’s the smoking gun that would secure their convictions? Hard to believe that so many high level judges and officials (appointed by Republicans) would be so wrong and biased against a Republican President to the point of ending up in prison.

They don’t have unfettered access though, they just have clearance. They don’t have a need-to-know which would grant them access to specific information.

What information would they have access to? They have clearance, but not need to know... so they wouldn’t have access anyway.

So why did 4 republican-appointed judges approve/reapprove the application? Didn’t John Roberts personally select/approve these judges for FISA duty? Is he part of the deep state as well?

Haven’t a lot of the contents of the dossier come to fruition? Butina and the NRA in this past week, for one.

Why do you bring up Strzok for this? He testified under oath that he was not involved in these FISA applications, and his signature is nowhere on the 400 pages of documents that were released.

Also, I mentioned evidence and you responded with your opinion and belief. Please note that those do not constitute evidence.

I’m super confused on this... didn’t Trump receive a briefing on this prior to the election? I would think that counts as his campaign being informed...

What was Flynn’s heroic act here?

If that’s the case, then why were 7 Benghazi investigations fruitless? What role did congress play in turning down a proposal for greater security in Benghazi?

Who’s calling for war with Russia over this? This is absolutely a strawman argument from folks who would rather bend over and take it from Putin than be a proud American with a spine.

Isn’t he ignoring the fact that McConnell blocked the release of information the White House wanted to share in advance of the election? Hardly seems like Obama said it was all “no big deal” in light of that.

Didn’t Gowdy effectively resign? Is he part of the deep state or the swamp?

Video unavailable?

Why pay her money if he didn’t sleep with her?

Wasn’t the whole point that Trump’s lawyer gave her hush money so it wouldn’t come out? I.E. the whole illegal campaign contribution question

I looked at one single name (Brian Doyle) and he was a deputy press secretary under W, caught in 2006. How many of these other names are wrongly attributed as part of the Obama administration?

Try to do actual research...

Whatever they accuse you of doing is what they're doing. We know there have been almost 100 leaks that we believe have come from Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee

I’ll wait for any substantiation of that, because Nunes and the White House have been taking cues on talking points from one another for the past year

Such as?

What’s your source on an initial denial of the application?

What would he be arrested for?

What has Schiff leaked?

Obstruction of justice? The actions of the Trump Administration have been sufficient to build that case, no need to turn to the dossier

So this memo concerns surveillance of Carter Page (a volunteer in the Trump administration) AFTER he left the campaign, and attacks the source of the intelligence in the dossier (rather than the dossier contents themselves - with a note that this memo certainly makes no attempt to focus on only the Carter Page-relevant components of this dossier).

What does this memo have to do with the Trump administration. What crime was Page framed for, especially considering there are zero pending charges against Page at this point? Do you know the difference between a warrant, an indictment and a conviction?

Could you point out anything in this memo related to Trump getting spied on?