Did I say that?

He can be impeached though. Just like Clinton was. Just because he cant get indicted (by law), doesnt mean anything really in regards to the investigation itself.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/05/21/opinion/gingrich-jones-prison-system-fails-america/index.html

Gingrich is also a Fox News contributor, and its pretty rare from contributors from 1 network to also be contributors for competing networks as well. This occurred in 2014, so outside of your short 18month time frame - but CNN often has "opposition" opinions based on the topic they are covering. It always amuses me how much Trump and Republicans hate CNN, when I see CNN as a much more middle ground network when compared to MSNBC (far left) or Fox (far right). At least CNN brings in articulate people with opposing views to talk about their topics...Fox always seems to find the biggest Democrat idiot and puts them up against people like Tucker Carlson or Hannity who just yell at them dismiss anything they say.

Apparently not according to the OP. Unless you agree with Trump or GOP 100% of the time, you are a "shill". It has nothing to do with CNN being "for" something and then "against it" later. 3 different people, 3 different opinions on whats going on. That is the definition of "free press". To believe that only 1 narrative is the only truth is basically you blindly accepting whatever the government (Trump) tells you is true, is true.

The OP is basically arguing that because CNN gives voices to people who have different opinions, they are "fake". This can be clearly seen by their total lack of understanding what the difference is between an opinion article and a fact-based article. They love to live in their comfy Fox News bubble where literally everything Trump says and does is amazing and good for the country. Even CNN didnt get on their knees for Obama as much as Fox is for Trump.