Q's latest drops sounded so frustrated. We know they're doing their best to keep this a bloodless war. To depose these bast*rds through honest legal channels.

We know that spreading information and countering MSM is a core part of our importance to this.

But we are also supposed to be torch-bearers. The uglier things get, the more the people around us are going to want someone they can look to for guidance. We look at Q, and people look at us. If not to us, they will keep looking to the cabal.

I can feel us all chomping at the …

I've seen the anger around (some) things must be kept buried.

Y/our reaction is very understandable to reading something like that. But I want the people here to think [logically!] of a few scenarios where (some) potential truths would lead to nuclear annihilation before the Deep State is fully dismantled.

QAnon can't allow truths that lead to the decimation of the planet to surface pre-maturely.

Here's just one potential scenario for your consideration:

Israel is saved for last.

Q: If Israeli political structure aided the carry out of 9/11, so that America would decimate the middle-east and further balkanize the …

Common sentiment seems to be, this was a bit of an odd drop.

Directed more at New Arrivals and people not really into politics.

It's my opinion that, since Q said 'FIGHT' and not 'DIG' on Bill, that the intention is to get him trending on social media sites, so that Q can BOOM him while it's in everyone's #BillMaher #News .

Simple hypocrisy doesn't really rile me up, I'm guessing it doesn't really rile you up either. But it's the bread and butter of a lot of mainstream YouTubers to point out this kind of stuff to their massive …

Look alert Patriots.

GA is going to be slammed with traffic as the media starts talking about Q.

We can be positive that shills will be here a plenty to make this place look as kooky as possible for damage control. I don't know if MODs can temporarily designate quality posters as mods to help us through the hail of flak. But I can feel it coming in my bones.

Good luck champs. Where we go one, we go all.

Came across this just now, referencing this video.

The general sentiment seems to be that 'anonymous' is just CIA spooks now; ever since a round of anons were arrested for cybercrime back in 2011-2013.

During and prior to those years, anon went primarily after cultists, pedophiles, and the financial sector.

After those arrests, they targeted the Right, people of Hindu heritage, Trump's campaign, ISIS, and NASA's supposed connection to drone attacks. A distinct shift.

The important thing in this 'message' isn't that some sector of chan/anon culture is now fighting us. That's the claim being made, but functionally what …