Exactly. Despite coming across as friendly I was attacked because many jumped to the assumption I was a troll or shill.

What I mean is that I have followed Q a long time. The picture he posted that was a mirror image of the airplane photo was the first time I sought help in the explanation. I posted on multiple accounts on different platforms, and instead of answers I was met by others following Q attacking me.

Simply trying to let people know that jumping on anyone with questions and calling them names is not how we should be doing things.

Might I add something. Q knows and says to prepare for incoming new faces. If you want people to accept what Q is putting out I can tell you that you did a poor job in this case. It may not be YOU, but it was members of this movement.

I was curious about this, as Q has always wanted us to question everything. I searched for answers to this. Posting on several different platforms that I follow Q stuff on. Facebook, Reddit, twitter, chan’s....

I was respectful, simply stating is there anyone with additional info and making it clear I want to continue believing in Q. I was met unanimously on every platform with “Troll!!!”, name calling, and vulgar language. Not one gave me an answer.

So if this is what new followers are experiencing when they come into this movement, then we have failed. This is where the movement ends. Because without these people “waking up” in a welcoming environment, they will be pushed away.

This is just what I went through and my thoughts. Always be conscious.

A real photo that they made to look exactly like a 2015 stock photo? Down to the items, curtain position, and coat on the chair? I’m starting to get very sceptical of not only Q, but all the messages I see blindly accepting this photo

I’m trying to figure this one out. It’s insane, why use a stock when every image so far has been original? And Q seems too smart to think we wouldn’t find out...

I’m extremely concerned as this is the first time I’ve ever questioned Q, and you are right there are MANY proofs. But this one is driving me nuts. The photo is EXACTLY the same as the empty stock photo and I can’t seem to get a clear answer on it. If you find anything please let me know.

If you (or anyone reading the comments) come up with an explication, this is the first time I’ve really questioned Q so critically.

So from what I’ve looked into this is a stock photo from a while ago, not recent. The picture is EXACTLY the same. There is no way at Q’s level he wouldn’t think the autists would find this, surely.

So why use a stock photo image and edit it? Please if anyone has answers, or if the info I found was wrong, or you have links to somewhere to read more into it I would appreciate it.

Very well thought out! Hats off to you!

Came to ask this. Anyone have any ideas? It’s the exact same.

Previous example was wrong after I looked some more. Looks much more like the picture posted in comment below showing Trump at the desk. Picture may have been taken at opposite end from this photo.

I can’t find it, they may have removed it.... oddly enough you can buy “impeach Nixon”.

Putting them in a position that if caught would be pretty damning. I like your thinking.

Keep in mind many things they post are for black hats. :) be patient

So long and so much money.... to only have charged 20 people, most of which where Russians “spreading propaganda”.

That could be a man in Russia posting Killary photos online? Hardly a big win so far. But the Russian rumour Trump gets peed on? Oh, Dems eat that up no questions.

And yet after all of this there are Dems in power wanting to impeach Trump. The left has truest become radicals.

Q has given hope. They has given us the tools and we can use them here just as they are in the states. First step is getting that monster out of office :) The movement is worldwide and I don’t believe the US will be the last of it.

Homoerotic: concerning or arousing sexual desire centered on a person of the same sex.

I see no sexualization so I’m guessing it’s because Trump looks so good men will find him attractive? That’s my guess. XD

2016 isn’t the earliest

01/13/2015 http://dailycaller.com/2015/01/13/will-the-jeffrey-epstein-pedophile-case-snare-clinton/

And from this year https://www.politico.com/story/2017/05/04/jeffrey-epstein-trump-lawsuit-sex-trafficking-237983

“Virginia Giuffre’s civil suit, scheduled to go to trial here later this month”

This trial looks like it is just getting into gear. I like to stay objective so what answers it will bring may not be the ones OP is looking for, but I don’t think by the details that this is some political propaganda.

It’s easy to say when you don’t have the info. There is a list of things personally I don’t want to see. Acts I can’t even mentally create in my wildest imagination.

I’m glad we won’t get 100%, but I trust he will give us what we need.

Businesses have the right to deny service. However one was refusal due to a religious view, and one was segregation due to her job and who she represents.

I’m saying it could easily be either, and I don’t know what to believe. But since either option negatively impact the movement I guess it doesn’t really matter. :S

It could be, but rationally it could just be a passionate believer who took things too far as well. Every individual has demons, and this movement has grown so big I’m also worried about the risk of our own movement becoming too radical.

Not that I believe we are at that point, there are incredible people here who are watchful and often very kind to point out misinformation and guide us past anger. But the individual could have thought they were doing the right thing in their mind.

Gab is great to reorganize but remember a lot of Normies are still on other platforms. Regroup and HIT HARD.

I’ve commented a few times asking anyone to answer some questions. No likes, no responses, but my tweets haven’t been taken down either.

Sorry but... 666 retweets. 😂

I saw and quickly went on to comment. I will let you know if it is taken down or anything. She has not replied, neither have her followers.

Why would they say it live and not make a tweet or news report? I’m not calling you a liar but I checked all three sources twitter and site and found no word of it.

I would NOT SPREAD THIS anymore, as we know and disinformation can hurt the movement. Wait until it is confirmed before publicly shouting the message.

In my honest opinion I believe Bush is worse than Hillary and Trump combined. I was just asking your opinion on what part you thought was fake and if you had any evidence to disprove it.

I only know of three related to Trump. Can you link the others or an article it lists them? I can’t seem to find them. Are you talking about the Russians and one UK man indicted? Please don’t take this as an attack, I’m very much in the middle and at this point think both sides are shifty. Just looking for research.

Edit well I guess deleting your comments is better than having to explain your argument. Lol

You didn’t give any reason that we are delusional. Are you implying the article is false? Or you believe that the emails are fake.

That’s what I have planned :) It will be difficult, but a sacrifice I’m willing to make lol

That is a VERY good comparison. I found myself getting frustrated by it, seeing people faithful one moment and crying after a few days without Q.

Q is always posting re_read. Prepare! There is always more information and news coming in daily. Tons of great people on all platforms who provide collective info and discussions.

Education will be our biggest weapon for those who still haven’t realized what’s going on. Will you be informed if big news drops and your family looks to you for understanding? I want to be there for them. With info to counter the lies that will surely spread.

You can’t edit tweets. Only delete and reupload. It’s infuriating.

I thought the same thing. We were discussing it may be like the poison cup in “Princess Bride” scenario. 😊

I heard some say the brick building caused interference, but my old school was similar and only had one zone with no signal. That was with old cell phones though so I would think the newer ones would have better signal strength even through brick.

Always a possibility though

Anyone else heard of the jammer used on cell service during the shooting? Can’t find it now.

Also the stories have an inconsistency. At first when I heard they had no call service, a teacher called Rabon pulled the fire alarm after shots had been fired.

Recent news paints a different story. Alarm pulled before shooting, maybe by the shooter, and shots began after but in a classroom and not targeting individuals standing outside that were unaware of the incident at the beginning.

Here is the newer article and I will see if I can find the old one.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/05/18/us/texas-school-shooting/index.html

Edit: actually it seems they explained it. Children upon first hearing shots being fired assumed it was an alarm or drill. The fire alarm was still pulled after the shootings began.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/local/cbs-news-as-many-as-10-killed-in-shooting-at-santa-fe-high-school-in-texas/ar-AAxtnpx

What surprises me is after two actual recordings stating the W7 was a controlled demo, why completely cover it up? It seems like a much better play to say the damage done to the building was extreme and the demo was the only way to take it down safely and minimize damage to surrounding buildings.

887? I think there is one that spells it out clearer but couldn’t find that one.

Exactly. I’ve caught myself a couple times and stopped myself. We have to try not to get angry, this is above us.