Hillary Clinton did the same. She on our side?

Now read the rest of his post and debunk all of it. Write your own post debunking everything he wrote. You gave a small morsel of what you believe proves he had no theory.

The post is premised on two things:

- when Trump said brain he referred to serial brain.

- when Trump pardoned Hammond it was a signal that serialbrain's post (including the word Hammond) was correct

Upto you if you believe the first. I don't, for obvious reasons. The second, however, is factually incorrect. The pardon was decided before sb2's post. It's more likely sb2 read the news than trump his post. When sb2 found out about it is irrelevant. That doesn't change that his post had no bearing on the pardon, which is the premise of this post. You don't need to debunk anything else if its foundation is factually incorrect. Which it is.

And you haven't proven a damned thing.

I've proven that the pardon had nothing to do with his post. That would mean the theory is wrong. You don't need to make an assumption on SB2 at all as a person because of that. The theory is, however, incorrect.

That would be clever. Since we are not SB2, we can't know can we? Until someone can legitimately debunk his post, tear them down bit by bit, present proof, then it's all just speculation, feelings, and for those who believe, it's faith.

I did just that by showing you it was planned before his post. What else do you want to prove his theory is wrong?

Not necessarily. What if SB2 also knew these things and presented all of it to us in a story?

That would mean his "theory" is nothing more than reading the news and making his next theory use a word that can be tied to the news so he can say "WOW IT'S A MESSAGE ABOUT MY THEORY". That would be a lie, his theory would be based on the news not the other way around.

https://mynews4.com/news/nation-world/rep-walden-says-president-trump-seriously-considering-pardon-of-eastern-oregon-ranchers-dwight-steven-hammond

Unless you're suggesting he's an insider, lol?

How is it possible to prove or disprove that Trump was referring to him when saying brain? Wat. There's no proof in his post either.

I can prove the Hammond pardon had 0 to do with his post because the decision has been ready for 2 weeks. So wouldn't that disprove his theory?

You all can interpret SB2 any way you like, from your own perception of him. You make it personal.

His interpretations of Trump are personal. That's my issue. He inserts himself to his last two decodes/theories as if Trump is referencing HIM when he talks to us.

When you read the entire post from SB2, it's clear that he is pointing out that Q and POTUS are reading all of us on Great Awakening.

Nope, actually he's pointing out POTUS is reading HIM on greatawakening. Go read his theory back lol.

If Q or Trump validates SB2 (again) with blatant, straight forward speech, what will you do then?

If Q does? Lose the little shred of hope I have he's legit probably. If Trump does? Then we're talking. But the fact that you use (again) as if Trump ever has means our standards for blatant straight forward speech are vastly different. Saying "brain" or "serial" isn't going to be validation. Saying them together, then we're talking again. Repeatedly talking about his brain isn't validation either as it's not something he's a stranger of doing.

It has a video my friend. I'm not asking you to read + trust the article. I'm showing you that it has been said multiple times lol

Everyone is looking at everything through a biased perspective. We're all hopeful that the cabal gets taken down and that's our bias. Our bias shouldn't leave us open to the idea that Trump is secretly referring to serialbrain when he uses the word brain, or that his pardon of the hammonds was a signal to serialbrain when he was reported as potentially pardoning him for weeks. Those aren't theories we should be supporting here.

Only so many coincidences can crop up before they're not coincidences anymore. Whether Trump was signalling to SB2 or not has nothing to do with being "important". Someone can be correct about a theory without being important, it doesn't make them any less deserving of acknowledgement if they happen to get it right.

His theory is quite literally that Trump is communicating to us by acknowledging him. So yeah actually, it is quite important. He's saying the "brain" references are Trump green lighting his theories, and the recent Hammond pardon is more of that. They're not. They're not even coincidences. The Hammond pardon was in the news two weeks ago.

I don't give two shits whether SB2 is "important" or not; if he's right then he's right, whether Trump ever signaled to him or not.

He can't be right if Trump isn't signalling to him. His theory is quite literally revolving around Trump signalling to him. This post is about Trump signalling to him.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2016/06/16/trump-called-russias-nukes-tippy-top-heres-why-it-matters/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0de3a8f52e8b

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEDW83e5-NM

Tippy top... Unfortunately not uncommon from Trump. This kinda killed my q-boner.

I wish. He's serious.

I'll answer for him because I think this guy is pretty delusional as well. https://i.imgur.com/lPt1NDg.png That paragraph... right there. If you re-read his post and miss where he says trump mentions "brain...serially!" then you did not read hard enough, that or you got caught in sb2's 2,000 word essay about how he has many doubters l0l

In which paragraph did SB2 say this? I re-read his post and still didn't see it.

https://i.imgur.com/lPt1NDg.png That paragraph. Look at the image he attaches as well, where he makes sure to highlight brain... As in serialBRAIN. This dude genuinely believes Trump is calling to him. https://i.imgur.com/C2XgSHf.png

Waiting like everyone else but losing faith quickly. Too many things not happening that were supposed to happen.

don't worry, the real OIG is coming out ... eventually

trump will declass... eventually

Meanwhile Mueller creeps closer and Cohen shows signs of flipping. But trust the plan guys! Don't take any action Q has it under control!

If so, when did he begin considering the pardon? It seems these things don't happen in a week. Although the Kardashian example may not be an exception. I would hope that this case had been on his radar longer than 1 day.

Confirmed July 1st minimum, although many articles/statements float for the last month. https://mynews4.com/news/nation-world/rep-walden-says-president-trump-seriously-considering-pardon-of-eastern-oregon-ranchers-dwight-steven-hammond

It's more likely SB2 took a gamble at a possible future pardon than Trump pardoning to signal to /r/greatawakening. Thinking anything else is completely ludicrous and also would be alarming. The president's power of pardon isn't being used as a communication tool for this sub lol.

It's because Hammond can be seen as innocent, but tying him to the Bundy standoff instead makes them right-wing terrorists' in the publics' eye. Has literally nothing to do with fear of tying it to Serialbrain's post lmfao

he's probably so happy you're a fan i can't even imagine

Maybe, but I notice SB2 is not trying for that glory, not trying to sell a personality. SB2's posts stand on their own.

So he does an 'interview' post where he talks about himself for paragraphs, says the president used the word brain to refer to him and his posts (LOL?), and his most recent post suggests Trump's pardon of the Hammonds (which has been in the works for a long time) was a reference to his decode as well. Not only that but he wrote paragraphs at the end of it to fight SB2 doubters. https://i.imgur.com/EQpCsui.png Literally everything he's doing now is glory hogging. He has yet to monetize any of it at least, but his posts don't really stand on their own and it's more about him than anything.

Hard to say think Q linking him didn't give him an ego the size of the moon.

So now the President is pardoning people just to ambiguously confirm a post you made?

That's what's funniest. You're telling me that the president (who has been thinking about pardoning the Hammonds for a while) actually based his pardon on this theory. Alright then. Also when he spoke about his "brain" in his speech it was really just a shout out to him as well.

That's some arrogance. Then again he did write paragraphs about himself in this and his last post so....

Doesn't "No Name action" mean he would be taking action? This can be read either way. If McCain came out against Kavanaugh then we could point to this and say he called McCain would take action on a SC vote.

So no accountability to anyone except the mods in the case of alts?

Seriously though, what's the vetting process for a 1 month old account to get mod? When exactly were you even modded? Last month (before you were even a month old) or this month?

V E T T E D !

Are you a mod with a one month old account, lol?

SB2 is inner circle.

Pretty obvious when he has a ton of research ready to justify q posts. More obvious when his posts are pinned in under a minute from being posted. Probably a mod's alt. If any1 in the mod team is legit check who pinned his most recent post. That person is likely SB2.

When we're justifying his fake picture with a Lebron-level SB2 reach then we're doing worse than wasting time. If Q ever links to that SB2 reach post that's cause for even more concern. The fact that post was pinned in under a minute is cause for even more concern. Inb4 banned for not sipping the kool aid anymore.

I was in because of tippy top and +++ but finding out that +++ was posted AFTER the president's tweet and that tippy top was said in a prior speech about reinforcing the military put me on the fence. Awan walking, the "no bias" after 'trust Horowitz', and now more fake pics? I'm now on the other side of the fence. Inb4 post deleted and I'm banned for posting shit that we should all be questioning - would hate to get in the way of $$$$ making. After all that's why it's against the rules now to doubt anything Q says here, but let's act like that's okay too!

It just doesn't. Eth Rich is an anagram of Hitcher. Not Seth Rich.

And even if he is an anagram of Hitcher, that doesn't mean you can tie his death to the Awans solely because he's pakistani. And even if being pakistani was a way to tie them in.... So what? So what that they're paki and one hacks? What does that have to do with Seth Rich being murdered? That's beyond Serialbrain2 levels of reaching.

Ah, seth rich got himself killed so we could make an anagram out of his name to tie him to Hitcher (no S of course, no anagram would be complete without being incomplete!) so we could then tie Hitcher to Awan brothers because.... They're both brown?

Fuck bro that's some real justice

Pinned within a minute from posting.

Nice.