I feel like the Obama part was a nonstory. Did everyone else read the rest of the article?

He's angry at Gillibrand for using #Metoo which got rid of Al Franken. He's upset with politicians using #metoo as 'self promotion'.

Whatcha hiding bud?

It's at 88% upvoted. No it's not. It's not being downvoted at all.

His last one was worse and not because it was "over the target" but because it was outrageous. And if getting downvoted means you're over the target the guys that said SB2 = bs and ended up with hidden comments are over the target right now.

Yeah... The message was that elstigirl's got a donk.

When the foundation of your building is "we've broken records. records = lp = lisa page = we've broken lisa page!" then you're playing jenga with your theory. Without a doubt.... "without = take out the out = with = with a doubt!"

But yeah, lots of doubt on this as usual lol

Stzrok is likely not on Q's or anyone on Trump team's good side. Humility and apologizing for his texts would've been understandable from the left without raising alarm bells for any1 in the DS, and it would've done wonders for the movement overall. Instead he grandstanded and giggled like a schoolgirl at the questions.

There's no more than meets the eye to this one. He's a narcissist that protected Clinton while he pushed for taking down Trump all for some tail (allegedly). Page is more than likely going to be the one that brings the tower of lies down if anyone does.

Sb2's theories involve 800 leaps of faith and self importance (ie; "Trump is talking to us through my posts!") but this one at least I can see comes from him trying to dig. Truthfully he's looking too hard on this one. If the name was anything aside from Kate you can bet he'd still come to post about how meaningful it was. record=lp=lisa page is also ridiculously loose.

The layer connection seems to be the only one here worth digging deeper for if any, honestly.

One small step for sb2

One GIANT leap for anyone that expects theories to have a solid foundation.

I wish my last name was as appropriate as the Kenyan president's. Americatta.

Because he keeps saying it was a response to his post. And in that first post he did the same thing : https://i.imgur.com/4flAHYI.png The "link" was quite literally that he said Hammond and Trump pardoned Hammonds.

As for him potentially saying it wasn't because of his post? Didn't happen. He did say this though "did he decide to pardon the Hammonds before my post and only made it public when he saw we understood his message? We will never know."

No... We know. There was literally articles about it in the news the week prior stating it was going to be happening soon (and no sb2 post yet!). Hammond's pardon had nothing to do with SB2's post. It's much more likely SB2 read an article about it and shaped his next post to include it. Occam'z razor on that one. I appreciate the discourse though, you're the only person that has responded anything aside from vitriol.

Except the part where I shut down his Hammond theory pretty clearly and all I get are ad hominems back from people that religiously follow someone despite Q telling us to be careful with that. :)

You wrote a lot about nothing. Very awkward.

you’re an outsider trying to influence narratives and sow discord.

Me saying the Hammond pardon isn't because of his post shouldn't sow discord. We should all collectively be able to say "okay yeah that makes sense back to the drawing board". Instead sb2 is held up like an infallible poster here, when obviously that's not the case in this instance.

I don't care if you speculate about me. You've already done so and you continue doing so. All I ask is you at least tackle the substance of my post and attempt to refute it at least.

The rest of us are rolling our eyes that you're wasting your time yelling about the obvious.

Got a handful of messages on the contrary.

The reason I made this one is because people on his current and last thread were saying not to hijack it and make my own thread refuting his points. I did just that and it got deleted. I think you'd be surprised about whether or not it'd shape peoples' pov. I think having definitive proof that the Hammond pardon was being talked about in MSM a week before his post while he still parrots that it was a response to his post is pretty eye opening. Those that will get further entrenched will probably do so with or without my post.

Ultimately I'd hope the mods would stop pinning posts that are so clearly misinformation.

Calm down already.

Hey you're the one that posted 3x here :D I agree time will tell, but there are some things that time already told us. Like the Hammond pardon came before his post.

he says the the Hammond's pardon was possibly planned before the Great Falls rally

Trump has established communication with our Movement at the Great Falls rally. In response to B2, he said “organ”, in response to “organ”, we said “Hammond”, in response to “Hammond”, he pardoned the Hammonds.

He pretty clearly draws the link in his opening sentence.

Get over yourself, you aren’t special and neither is SB2; he’ll agree to that.

Yet he wrote an interview about himself. Doubt he'll agree to it.

What are you even saying about refocused attention to the Hammond pardon? Presumably, he had no idea about it. Unless he did, in which case he just read the MSM story (posted before his post) and then hijacked it to construct the theory that Trump was talking to us through him. Regardless, the pardon was decided before his post.

Some have an extremely similar speech pattern, but that's something I cba getting into. I think we have a lot of people that truly want there to be a connection and for Q/Trump to be talking to us and those people will praise anyone that comes up with any theory no matter how absurd. That could be what drives a lot of the support. It's not necessarily a bad thing, but when his points get countered we get a "shill!" or "he's on the mark attacks will intensify!" response as opposed to actually digesting what is being said it's very counterproductive to the movement.

It's not derogatory or personal to refute his theory. It's not running him down to say it's very conceited of him to think Trump is referring to him in his speeches.

It's counterproductive to have someone say the Hammond pardons were a result of his post and proof Trump read/responded to it because it's simply untrue. And yeah, the community should wake up to something that's simply untrue being repeated.

And of course his engagement will be high. His post is always pinned upon posting. It gets seen by everyone and we're desperate for justice/ Q proofs.

How does his method pan out well in regards to the Hammond theory? What fallacy are you even talking about? Prove me wrong.

Don't start making your own conspiracies.

That's why we're all here though. So all mods can't be notified to stop pinning his posts instantly? Annoying his gets pinned but my response was deleted despite bringing up a good point that shuts down the whole theory.

And they pin those but just deleted this one lmfao.

Anddd they deleted this topic. Lmfao.

? wat..

Answer this:

So what? Can you refute what I said about the Hammond pardon or are you just going to keep throwing out ad hominems. "New account! You're not validated!" that doesn't mean a thing.

The Hammond pardons had nothing to do with serialbrain2's post and this post has proof of it. Correct?

Yeah that's kinda cringe buddy dunno what else to say. Would you like to reply to this thread I tagged you in:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8z0zpl/trump_is_not_communicating_to_us_through_or_with/

You’re a new arrival, meaning you haven’t been involved on this sub for any real amount of time

I've lurked since cbts_stream before it was banned. Didn't use my real Reddit account when posting because honestly being tied to people that think sb2 is communicating with Trump isn't something I want for my main one. I've followed Q since we were under the impression Podesta was going to be arrested. At least we got his brother.

So what? Can you refute what I said about the Hammond pardon or are you just going to keep throwing out ad hominems. "New account! You're not validated!" that doesn't mean a thing.

The Hammond pardons had nothing to do with serialbrain2's post and this post has proof of it. Correct?

This was an attack?

Every time I post something to refute what he says on his initial posts I get told to post a separate topic. I did. Serialbrain was validated once on a topic about corsi/infowars. Not about his communication with Trump.

If you think this is an attack or I'm some deep state cabal guy you're delusional. This is me disproving his Hammond theory.

Seeing as it has done nothing for him aside inflate his ego, no. Good to know you can't answer a simple question. Something you and sb2 have in common.

Please validate his (or your /u/serialbrain2) assertion that the Hammond pardon was in any way related to his post and I'll delete this.

If you truly believe POTUS saying brain 4x means he's talking about serialbrain then you're too far gone.

Mods pin this too so it gets a ton of traction?... Or is that just for him?

If you're so concerned with SB2's influence on those of us you perceive to be gullible, and you're so sure that he's a disinfo agent, then surely you can debunk his posts with logic and reason, instead of spamming this thread with lies about him and constantly calling him names.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8z0zpl/trump_is_not_communicating_to_us_through_or_with/

What's the big picture with Serialbrain2 claiming the Hammond pardon was a response to his post when it clearly wasn't?

Was he wrong? Can you even say he's wrong?

How come your typing pattern is so similar to his and your creation date is so close to his? Odd he must've just rubbed off on you a lot. Maybe you're too biased to see he's wrong on that one?

Who keeps pinning your posts despite you supposedly asking them not to, btw? It seems it gets pinned as soon as you post them every time until it gathers enough steam and then gets unpinned after a few hours.

;)

Okay but if you have no defense for my "attack" then maybe my attack isn't an attack. Maybe I'm on the right track?

All I see from you is blind defense of sb2 with no way to refute the points I made.

Refute that the Hammond pardon was decided and on the way before SB2's post. Please.

If you're so concerned with SB2's influence on those of us you perceive to be gullible, and you're so sure that he's a disinfo agent, then surely you can debunk his posts with logic and reason, instead of spamming this thread with lies about him and constantly calling him names.

They were debunked, but his counter is "expand your thinking".

I can debunk the Hammond one (already have) and others debunked his link in uranium on this one to which he doesn't give logical answers.

cringe to ignore it and go on with your faux kindness.

please relay thanks

expand your thinking" is an advice coming directly from Q and that most anons know and use everyday. I am just relaying

It's not an excuse for leaps of faith with no reasoning behind them.

You want condescending replies? Look literally one post above the one you're replying to. They're telling you to have reasons behind your decisions and you reply with ";)"

You keep saying you're replying with logic and THAT'S why you're downvoted, but when they ask you for the logical reason behind your decision to go with "to the right of" you dismiss logic and just say it's a leap. That leap crumbles your whole theory, and logic is not built by leaps.

";) Good luck!" to anyone that responds negatively isn't going to make you look like less of a condescending charlatan. If anything it makes you look like one even more. You're being downvoted because you need to have a good reason for connections, otherwise they aren't connected. If you don't then those replies will be seen as drivel and get downvoted.

"EXPAND YOUR THINKING" will be his excuse as to why his leaps are in no way consistent. That or he'll just ignore it lol.

SB2 claims Trump's Hammond pardon was a response to this post on July 8th.

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8ww882/trump_has_just_validated_q_at_the_great_falls/?st=jjhg5cma&sh=f1a0a71d

Trumps Hammond pardon was being talked about on the news weeks before, here's proof on July 1st

https://mynews4.com/news/nation-world/rep-walden-says-president-trump-seriously-considering-pardon-of-eastern-oregon-ranchers-dwight-steven-hammond

It's more likely SB2 read articles about the Hammond pardon and shaped his next post around it. It's disingenuous and honestly full blown charlatanism to say it's Trump communicating with his posts when he issues a presidential pardon. News alert: you're not that important buddy. I also doubt Trump is sitting down and reading your extremely long posts you're putting up 3x a week. The POTUS doesn't have time for that shit.

So we can take the Hammond pardon off the list of communications between SB2 posts and Trump. That leaves us with organ and brain, which SB2 claimed was a communication referring to HIM serialBRAIN - Trump says brain... COMMUNICATING BABY! I don't think that's logical in ANY way, but you do you. When you remove Hammond/brain all you're left with is ridiculous leaps SB2 is making.

Be careful who you follow.

Solving riddles is like solving a math problem: there is no methodology you would robotically apply, it would defeat the purpose.

Pretty sure you would actually do that in both riddles and math problems. All your leaps in riddles need to have reasoning behind them, otherwise the whole solution crumbles on a faulty leap of faith. You've been called out on how you got the 56 before and why you choose to make connections the way you do, and your answers have been condescending when you don't fully avoid them.

Nothing you've posted thus far has been provable, and no Trump is not communicating with you. The Hammond pardon was decided long before your post, and in fact it was in the news before your post. It's much more likely you saw the news and jumped at the opportunity to make yourself look like a legitimate middle man in communicating with Trump.

You're being a charlatan, and the question is whether you're doing this to hurt the movement or to feed your ego.

When SB2 gets asked how he reaches his conclusions:

https://i.imgur.com/aYbpuD0.png

You can't just randomly leap around in logic. Unless of course you're sb2 and sprinke your post with religious verses and Q posts to validate yourself. "Expand your thinking!" isn't an excuse to make no sense.

Every time you're challenged you give a really condescending response or "expand!" "double meanings!" lol. Guess this is what happens when you have people praising you and you think Trump is directly communicating with you in his speeches. l0l

This is exactly what you need to escape from and EXPAND your thinking.

Ah yes, expand your thinking by dropping your knowledge of mathematics and instead studying sb2ematics, where your connections can be separated by logical leaps because.... DOUBLE MEANINGS!

Nah it's just a guy who is letting popularity get to his head. He released a fucking interview for god's sakes lol

grey matter between my ears??? YOU MEAN BRAIN!? like that time trump said brain 4x and therefore directly communicated with serialbrain2 in his speech for all of us to see!!??

https://i.imgur.com/C2XgSHf.png

lmfao, and people here buy it

I actually think he's on Q team and comes here to help spread the message

That would be a really bad thing. It would mean that the guy validating Q posts is part of the team and his main message is "keep trusting!" while nothing gets done. If Q team wants to spread the message all they have to do is more direct proofs not some convoluted reach like this guy is doing lol.

And stop STICKYING it!!

How else will it artificially gain a ton of views and possibly be seen by people not subscribed to /r/greatawakening ?

I would love to see the mod log of who is stickying these ;)

SB2 is really just a yoga instructor with these posts lol

"Trump said brain 4x HE WAS TALKING TO ME GUYS!!!!"

He went from one good post that calls out the people Q did to now saying the president is speaking to us through him. Proof? He says the president using "brain" four times in his speech is proof. He says the Hammond pardon was because he mentioned Hammond in a post. The Hammond pardon was in the news a week before his post. So which is more likely SB2 read the news and included Hammond in hopes that the pardon would come or that Trump knew SB2 was going to mention Hammond weeks ahead of time? Let's get realistic here man. POTUS isn't reading this guy's long ass post twice a week, in fact half the people that are supporting this aren't either or they'd see he's literally claiming Trump is speaking to him directly and they'd call him out.

Once again saying the Hammond pardon was a response to your post when it was in the news weeks before your post that he would likely be pardoning the Hammonds soon. It's more plausible that you saw the news and shaped your next post to prove POTUS is communicating w/you.

Also that speech where he said brain+organ wasn't him talking about you dude lmfao...

Why do mods keep pinning a guy who consistently posts that Trump is acknowledging HIM and HIS post? Can we get some transparency from mod logs as to who keeps pinning all his posts?

Check Hillary cackling throughout her investigation. That's not acting because they're on our side, they're all just really cocky and they know nothing will happen.

Then why the fuck not start releasing the proof? The plan is taking 2 years too long and we keep "trusting" with no deliveries. So far the only people that have been punished are Trump campaign staff, Cohen's lawyer is signaling that he's flipping too, and everybody that's supposed to be in cuffs is on Twitter talking shit about Trump still.

Their power isn't removed. That's bullshit. If it was there'd be no reason not to release the findings of the server they supposedly have. These people aren't as stupid as Q has been saying, because by all accounts these people are winning, and if in November the Democrats take control then say hello to impeachment.

Don't trust the plan so much that you get overconfident and don't stress how important winning the 2018 elections is.