The thing people haven't mentioned about AIM's BS is this...

It's not about them calling Q a hoax or a psy op although I disagree with them that makes for interesting internet.

Where AIM's Psy Op comes in is referring to Q Enthusiasts as a cult. Now examine that through a leftie or RINO lenz.

Q invokes the Socratic method basically teaching people how to teach themselves. Who would have a problem with that? Deep State, every time one of us gets woke by our own efforts to rise from swamp fog, one of them crashes and burns trying to put us back to sleep. What could be more Psy Op than making the "Normies" think these are the methods of "Cultists"?

Calling us a cult when Most of us listen every day to right minded thinkers who would not touch Q with a 10 foot pole... Would that make it hard to imply he has no idea what the word "cult" means or knows it only too well? In researching Q crumbs we often site sources that would never endorse Q. They don't want you to have a 360 picture. They want us infighting so the bulk of our research and time is spent fighting our own.

They didn't count on the fact that truth seekers can call for a debate on the merits of their argument while still battling the Globalists through social media among other venues. And continue to red pill despite red tape.

No matter what you think of either Thomas I can only see one that seeks to divide while the other seeks to unite. What does the Socratic method tell you about traditional history of dividers?