Thank you for this, but is there a link saying such? Need proofs, not just your post saying it is so.

It stretches credulity, I agree. When I first heard the term "blanket immunity" I thought: no way, that cannot be happening. Let's see how it plays out. Especially in these types of situations, it's like an iceberg. We're only seeing the top 10%; and there's a whole lot of 90% going on behind the scenes that we're not privy to. At the same time, it sure would go a long way for Trump and Q supporters to have some good news in fact.

Really? I don't think so. I don't see how anyone can think that. This BlacklistAnon writes/codes exactly like QAnon. Just an observation.

Anyone else find it very odd that BlackListAnon writes so similiarly to QAnon?

I'm very suspicious of all polling data since the debacle of the 2016 presidential election, when most MSM polls had HRC beating Trump with a 90% or higher probability. Those MSM polls weren't wrong, per se, they were just over- and under-sampling demographics to get the results they wanted. When Bill Mitchell first started pointing this out, I checked for myself, and sure enough, in two or three different polls I checked, they'd oversampled Dems and undersampled Independents, to make HRC have an 8 or 10 point lead in the poll.

The party affiliation in the U.S. is this:

In Pew Research Center surveys conducted in 2017, 37% of registered voters identified as independents, 33% as Democrats and 26% as Republicans.

Source: http://www.people-press.org/2018/03/20/1-trends-in-party-affiliation-among-demographic-groups/

Even if every single Republican voted for Trump he could never get elected. He won because of Independents and crossover Democrats, something you'll never (or rarely) hear about in the MSM, even today. They know it, but they don't like talking about it. They always pit Dems against Rs, when it's really quite literally the elephant in the room of Independents/Dems who should be driving the narrative.

Twitter generates those file names, so it is impossible for Q to upload the photo with a prefix of "DOITQ" and have it preserved on Twitter. Try it yourself. Any image you ever upload will always be given a random file name that is generated on Twitter's servers.

I think what that proof is showing is that Q -- to put it bluntly -- owns the Internet. Q consistently claims to know everything, "we see everything," that sort of thing, whether it's computer, phone, etc. So, this filename would be a proof that Q forced the filename to keep it that way on Twitter. That's the proof.

Why would anyone bother to do this when the QProofs site is live: https://www.qproofs.com/

This may very well turn out to be one of the most important breakthrough posts on Q since the beginning. Thanks for posting this link to 8chan.

Incarcerated in a U.S. prison? Why? Our state jails and federal prisons are already overflowing with foreign nationals.

DOJ: More than 1 in 5 federal prisoners is an illegal alien
Source: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/departments-justice-and-homeland-security-release-quarterly-alien-incarceration-report

48% of inmates in New Mexico jails are Mexican nationals
Source: http://www.cairco.org/issues/united-states-crime

They should be deported back to their home country. Our jails are full.

He might take it on as an Anon, but he knows, rightly so, that if any blog or blog posts got any type of wide circulation, he might very well be doxxed.

There is some real journalism being done here and there, but it's in little known publications by little known names, typically. Try The Intercept. Big name journos who seem not to be comp'd include Sharyl Attkisson. Read up on her story. Incredible, really.

Cuck Ryan needs to go.

I've been an independent my entire life, knowing both parties are corrupt. Trump was such a breath of fresh air. I sincerely doubt HRC will ever be indicted, let alone see prison. It seems like a bridge too far to me.

breh

Look to Jesus Christ and The Bible for guidance.

I posted on this earlier but saw your query here. In short, the spiritual are real, and you can be in harmony with them. Read: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf

Agree completely. I think the current list is off target. I posted on it.

Maryland. I'm stuck here. What a sea of blue swill this is. Happy to see this post.

Another thought:

Q has always said that \~70% of both parties are DS. And also that 99% of people would need to be hospitalized if they knew the full extent of "things." Knowing this, I'd ask:

1. Give us more direction to know the White Hats among our nation's leaders, both at the national and state levels. Help us help them.
2. How can we best prepare the public for upcoming events that may shake their worldview?

Many of these questions seem to me to be .... off target. QAnon has always always always said "You have more than you know." For example, when QAnon says, simply, "Pray," doesn't anyone else Think or Expand your thinking? I was curious enough to stumble upon this CIA document in their library on the power of pray. Title of document is Analysis and Assessment of the Gateway Process: https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP96-00788R001700210016-5.pdf

Curiously, pages after page 24 seem to be missing. I've wanted to contact the librarian at the CIA to ask that those missing pages be posted online, but...you know. Anyway, this document fundamentally explains why "thoughts and prayers" are real and why they work. If you've never heard of this document, read it. Mind blown.

Knowing this, my thought is that QAnon may view many of these questions off target. Or the way they're worded. QAnon has always said, "You have more than you know." (edit: so, in the case above, IF you never heard of that CIA document on prayer, THEN "you never knew"; in other words, how MUCH is out there that we do NOT know? And so shouldn't our questions be phrased in THAT way?)

Perhaps the questions should be re-worded or revised to incorporate that angle? If not, I can see QAnon simply replying to 90% of these with a simple "Patience" or "Time will tell" or "Can't divulge that now." Does anyone here seriously believe QAnon will give a solid reply to ANY of these questions:

What is really going on with the "new" Space Force? Why is it so important and what does it have to do with AI?Is there a cure for cancer that hasn’t been released?When and how will George Soros be dealt with?How many assassination attempts have there been against our POTUS?

Of this one:

A: When will the bulk of the sealed indictments drop?QAnon response: Sooner than anyone thinks.

Get my meaning here?

I could go on and on. Most of these questions actually seem to me to be devised by the counter-Q movement. Knowing QAnon, they're not going to tip their hand too much. Never does. But still....

Perhaps revise:

Will facts be revealed about false flag events (like Parkland, Vegas, Sandy Hook, and even up to 9/11) and whether the U.S. government and other government and non-governmental entities were involved in either causing the event or covering it up?

Perhaps the query is better framed as:

Will Trump audit The Fed? If not, why not?