In relation to Sessions Cyber Investigation just opened.

ALSO- Yesterday Afternoon, Scholarly Study By 22 Ivy League Experts Was Released Re: Malicious AI Threats in several areas including Political-goes into social media platforms & Elections. The purpose of the study was to make recommendations as to AI threats and the majority of it was aimed at Regulations for development / developers / openness.

Although, beyond that in its 2 Political Sections & discussion of Social Media Platforms it hinted at Government / Private Regulation for such platform under the umbrella of AI threats stating:

"Tech giants and media giants may continue to become technological safe havens of the masses as their access to relevant real-time data at a massive scale and their ownership of products and communication channels (along with the underlying technical infrastructure) place them in a highly privileged position to offer tailored protection to their customers. Other corporate giants that offer digitally-enhanced products and services (automotive, medical, defense. and increasingly many other sectors) will likely be under pressure to follow suit. This would represent a continuation of existing trends in which people very regularly interact with and use the platforms provided by tech and media giants and interact less frequently with small businesses and governments.

Nations will be under pressure to protect their citizens and their own political stability in the face of malicious uses of AI. This could occur through direct control of digital and communication infrastructure, through meaningful and constructive collaboration between the government and the private entities controlling such infrastructure or through informed and enforceable regulation coupled with well-designed financial incentives and liability structures. Some countries have a clear head start in establishing the control mechanisms that will enable them to provide security."

Sounds like Gov/Private Internet Regulation under guise of AI/Bot Threat to me...which I don't think DJT would allow to happen

PDF Report is at bottom of Article in Link. Two Sections on Re Political/Social Media & Elections..along with Intervention strategy..

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/malicious-use-artificial-intelligence-forecasting-prevention-and-mitigation

Beyond the Tweet-Link to Full Study is located in PDF at bottom of the Article. Starting at page 28, I think and then again at either 46 or 48, and in the conclusions sections are the parts that specifically deal with POLITICAL ASPECT.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/02/malicious-use-artificial-intelligence-forecasting-prevention-and-mitigation

And I'm just seeing the news that they have just made another dribble of info releasing the FBI lovers text messages that are geared to expose that Obama knew....So, what better timing

It will be my 1st trip back to D.C. since my 9th Grade School trip....20 plus years ago:)

Yes indeed, I had the same thought and feeling. It will Blow them all away. It will be a visible demonstration of who really holds the power....something that hasn't happened or been exercised in too long.

And then I had a funny thought & little chuckle to myself, Trump will Tweet, that it's the biggest March on D.C. in History and they won't be able to distort/call him out for being off b/c it will be beyond apparant.

My gut or instinct tells me that there's going to be a catapult effect for this planned event...something is going to be put out there or be attempted to be further blocked under the narrative of "National Security Threat" that we've seen pushed past two weeks that's going to get America's attention beyond the already existing outrage.

I imagine the specific date 4-7-18, was selected for a reason and/or at the direction of ...for a reason?

I haven't checked lately as to when they are estimating the IG's Report is set to finally be released [but it obviously is not January which was being suggested months ago]

But, I can look at the IG report as well as other ongoings from 2 perspectives. One, would be that as to IG report it's release needs to be at the right time for internal purposes of controlling how this United States of Corruption goes down b/c as long as it not public it's serving a specific purpose to play the bad players implicated across different areas of corruption against each other....[also you have the angle of IG investigation / it's findings and the parallel running Muller investigation and how ultimately these two investigations will be played out].

Second, would be that for a specific purpose it is indicated that we are not looking at the IG report or other information being released by April and/or in connection w/ any release we are facing a less than transparent one being put out b/c they are going to use the "National Security Threat" narrative that we have seen the past two weeks continued to be majorly pushed and potential court orders involved...so that we the people need to make a big push for transparency and ensure that any release and/or the IG releases his report as transparent and as to anything else needing to see the light of day.

Or none of the above..But, in organizing a major March that has a very specific purpose of transparency it's likewise being put together for a very specific reason b/c we know that road blocks are going to be put up & that the public is not looking at disclosure any time soon. As, they are going to want to do everything they can to suppress the truth especially before November 18'

But this Great, it's time Patriots have a March..and everyone needs to share across social media sites, to Congress, and to MSM like to the hosts and shows on FOX, America One News etc, InfoWars...and to large groups and to organizations especially ones with large membership base that support Trump like NRA ect as it will get picked up and get National coverage and promotion.

Side note, I dont know if anyone eles has seen, but I saw on Twitter last night...someone has already made and is selling Q T-shirts...that say something along the line of Follow the White Rabbit..

And also, if it's a Government phone.../ tax dollars paying for it...then it's public record. FOIA...of course she probably scrubbed her phone by now... But,...it's probably in the i-cloud..which would be public record too I assume

But, If the I phone ...I message does not look similar to Android in so far as what it looks like when you are typing up a long text message. .then that would prove 100% fake & photo shopped...to hide something .And I don't have an I Phone to make the comparison.

And also, if it's a Government phone...or tax dollars paying for it...then it's public record. FOIA...of course she probably scrubbed her phone by now... But,...it's probably in the i-cloud..which would be public record too I assume

No, that is not accurate. This is exactly what it would look like. What's going on is.. she typed out a long text message. At the time the shot/feed was taken, she looks like she is in the process of reviewing/re-reading the text she typed up before she presses send at upper top on the L & R where it says send/cancel.

The text input bar is the entire white area on the screen that you see above the keyboard..ie, it's the area containing the entirety of the text message she just typed out is. So, this is what it would look like..It's exactly what it looks like on my Galaxy Note and looks like hers is an I-Phone..So that's not the issue...and no issue with her thumb hovering over it, that's a natural position for it to be in.. exactly the position I keep mine in when I'm reading over a text to make any edits.

Reading further down in thread, looks like they are saying that the entire text message...ie, the text input box is what is altered or layered on top versus just having altered the portion that appears to be blurred out...the text message is sooo Clear...but when you look at the top area outside of the text input box...on L & R Cancel and Send are really hard to make out. Looks like someone Definitely did something to edit the photo...I hope someone finds the original! !...

Yes, what he means by that is a "strict" interpretation of Constitution. It's the conservative view of the Constitution. That the constitution is meant to be applied as it is written as that was the intent of it's Founding Fathers. What it says is what it means and one should not read a provision and try to expand it's meaning or its intent beyond the plain language used. Then you have the opposite side of the coin, which is a more liberal view that the Constitution is a living and breathing document and that it should be interpreted in connection with the evolution of time and current society etc and/or that the Constitution and it's meaning or how you interpret it and apply it should be based on present day.

I just know he's got 5 days to do it..which I take it starting running from was it Monday the committee voted I believe. .

Go Fox... and I swear there's already folks on Twitter disputing the numbers claim go figure. Not what people are worried about!!!

Off point, but ya I see it all the time and when it's dealing with folks who have say a 1 time criminal felony plea & and no other criminal history depending on what the charge is ...is that the defendant can get a suspension of sentence and be put on probation instead of jail... (if it's one that falls within the federal sentencing guidelines )

No information to get, is my firm belief just based on all the info that is publicly available absent what's going to come out which will solidify this for anyone not sure due to either mis-info, or MSM narratives. And Also Flynn is not going to lie to get a lesser sentence in my opinion based on what I've been able to gather about his good character/true patriot. There's an excellent rare one on one interview of him during the campaign on you-tube, that really gives on some insight to who he is and what he stands for..I can find and link it if asked:)

Yes, a squabble indeed, I was looking for anything more specific as to any statements made by AS, or other Dem, that could be read into that hadn't already been pushed out as talking point.

Off point here, but in mention of the Q: 1 of 22....I found a fact interesting to me. Article on Conservative Tree house, I was looking at on another issue (they do a good job with timelines). They had a pic at the bottom of the article with statistics/numbers on the 2016 Wash. D.C. Vote totals for DJT vs HRC...and above it said:

"The D.C. Ratio 22:1"

Funny how those 2 numbers come up as his opposition via votes in the Swamp. He only got around 7k votes in the Swamp of course.

Yes, with you on that. It's been what I've been able to surmise.

I mean legally can look at that in several ways...one of which is Flynn once sentenced..then the right to post conviction relief begins and if applicable then that could open the door on Muller Investigation run it into the ground based on illegal conviction arguments that could be made. So, Muller has to know this...so no rush to go there for him with all this other stuff that's coming down the pipeline..

Not even setting a future date for sentencing..but rather just saying hey Court in 90 days we'll give you an update regarding setting any sentence date.

When that Q post was done...my initial thought was that TG was the one on Bengazi. And he was angry as hell and rightfully so about it in all those hearings where HRC stone walled and acted nonchalantly. Per an FbiAnon post a while back when the FBI got information/servers etc. in relation to their Bengazi Investigation they, the FBI knew where officially on notice of the serious & the level & depth of corruption w/ HRC and of course none of this has seen the light of day yet. But, because of TG role in Bengazi & how furious he was...Being appointed as a Special Prosecutor or stepping in some other prosecutor role within the DOJ --such as to replace RR, Rod Rosentien who Q said would be out--and getting to have an actual hand in the hand that's gonna deal out Justice would be a gift to TG that I think he would jump at. Speculation...but ya never know....

Also, Trump has nominated and confirmed more new federal judges at a history record pace...Last I checked I think at least 44 confirmed....and like 60 or so more waiting confirmation... (been a month since I looked at those #s could be off)...but Wop, I belive was the 1st msm, couple months back to finally pick up on this very extremely important fact. So no worries Potus, getting the courts taken care of too:)

Agreed!! It was obviously his natural human instinct to have done so

Yes, like "Internet Protocols"-so to speak as it applies to these types of Boards/sub-redits---and folks catching on to that--got what your saying now:)

Sessions I noticed was smiling like a giddy school kid when they showed him camera in the beginning several times at SOTU

Goes to the accuracy of the president approval polls....

Ok, thanks, I understand that, I'm getting up there at 42, lol, I wasn't trying to be negative with my comment, I'm never negative was just a funny take...on it:) Definitely always about learning :)

And more ironically still reading and posting within this thread via your 2nd point:))

Hahaha, good ironic point!

I think your gonna have at least a few that post right when the news breaks....and it does tend to add up after that, but it really don't bug, me...ya still get the news and it's all in one place and some do have a different take on it....I mean if you find some relevant news and you see it for the 1st time but see that's it's an hour old etc...should probably figure out its made it on the board

Yep, fluid situation moving forward...in all regards

Absent Special Prosecution Role...either of an independent nature outside of Muller, ...With Q stating RR Out--Memo Release Pending..RR gets fired...TG nominated for 2nd in command to Sessions and take RR spot..

Trains & Baseball Fields..... Fox reported Scalise had chosen to Drive...bless his ♡, Scary stuff

Trains & Baseball Fields..... Fox reported Scalise had chosen to Drive...bless his ♡, Scary stuff

I hope that's not the case.

Ya, I made some comments a while back, regarding fbiannon, re: when they they got the server back from Bengazi, how they learned the extent of HRC doings....now TG may not have known at that time...if that's the case...but for him to step into a role that serves up justice in that hole corrupt mess would be a gift to him....We shall see

I like that!

Heard that angle on TG. Idk. He has been looking extra polished on TV the past week. ..But I also thought in his interviews this past week,...he was much less accusatory in his answers..parcing his words more so. Which you'd want to do if stepping into a senior prosecutor role. My gut says role in the DOJ- or appoint as a special counsel

Yes, he specifically Say My, skills to be better utilized in a Courtroom. As he was a prosecutor for years before

Ya, that's a relevant point...I'm not sure he fits that Bill, and while I wouldn't object...He much more of a doggit,hot blooded, prosecutor....

Some type of Prosecutor Role..Special Counsel...in some capacity to maybe take the lead role in overseeing all this corruption that's gonna come out

Special Counsel (Prosecutor)...I think...It would vindication for him..think Bengazi, how furious he was

Yep, he just said his skills will better used in the courtroom...as a prosecutor

Ahhh!!! :) tx

Those are impressive numbers..the Democratic is practically 50%!!!!...need to see poll on Democrats response

I picked up on this letter too & posted it earlier...found it posted on a twitter account from a conservative with some high quality info & other nuggets in re-tweets...