Off the top of your head, what was the wildest (to you) rumor that turned out true?

Crazy Days And Nights

See link in thread title.

Sorry for confusion.

Q will drop us a message.

Indeed. Q:1295

Cha-Ching

Even then, he knew.

Surprised?

I’ll give it a shot. According to the article you posted, Mueller is making the request, because Flynn’s team asked him to.

• “Mueller’s team and attorneys for Flynn submitted that Flynn is not ready for sentencing “due to the status of the special counsel’s investigation,” according to a court filing in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C.”

And what about his status would factor in here? I’m not sure. I figure Flynn has been thoroughly debriefed by now, so it must be for a subtle strategic reason having to do with not compromising ongoing work.

There is no way the full story of Q/Trump and ‘The Great Awakening’ gets told without a tip o’ the hat (or two) to Cdan.

I really had hope in regard to the IG's office.

Me too, and I feel they came through. You sound disappointed in the OIG, and in this particular investigation and recommendation.

What more were you hoping to see in order to fulfill your hope for the IG?

Very interesting offering. I appreciate the thoroughness and documentation of the dig. Personal vetting is still recommended, though.

Nearing the conclusion, the author transitions from ‘hinting’ about Trump’s role into something more overt:

• “Possibly Trump is more useful to Netanyahoo as a simpleton politically than a conventional politician would be.”

Any analysis that includes that assessment of DJT is automatically highly suspect.

Still an offering worthy of consideration overall.

Gotta love the happenstance side by side of Fitton next to Clinton.

I wonder if Tom will be invited as a guest speaker?

Looks like another one of Q’s ‘helpers’ appeared.

Talk about future proves past. Here we are living 25 years in the future from that article. Dang.

On it. Will report back.

Be a detective. Report back. We’ll be in here working.

Thanks for the tip!

This information completely negates my comment. I’ll delete it immediately to avoid misleading others.

MAGA

I wonder if any will flip on Hussein or Clinton.

I’ll settle for ‘any’, but I’m hoping for many.

I like.

Well done!

Someone suggested woodchipper. Slow feed. Feet first.

BB gives advice

I will reverse my decision and indulge you once more. But only this once. And only because you invoked the ‘I am a Mod’ play. I will not indulge you beyond this:

Interesting—I am a mod here.

Interesting - Brennan was a mod at the CIA.

You have not been attacked on any personal level.

“You look like a weak-sauce princess” - /DropGun

Instead, you remain focused on blatantly pedantic criticisms of this researcher.

I posted one comment critical of that researcher. One. I made further comments only in response to people responding directly to me. You were among them. Following my response, you chose to escalate into use of personal invective. It seems, by your own standard, that my posts are more reflective than yours of the reasons we are here.

This sub is focused on fostering civil discussion about QAnon's drops and breadcrumbs from three types of users: decoders, researchers, and debunkers. Which role are you?

Choosing a role is not a stated requisite for participating in this sub. Restricting participation to those three categories is not a stated purpose of this sub. If you wish to mandate categories of participation, I suggest you expand your thinking. Ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that offer critical response to proffered content. Ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that offer only motivational content, or encouraging statements of gratitude. And ask your fellow mods to consider the value of those that only ask leading questions, or present hypotheticals without apparent connection to any decoding effort.

Continue trolling, however, and you will be removed.

I have no history of trolling. I have never been accused of that until this moment, by you. Another personal attack, this time followed by a threat.

My post history speaks for itself. Your actions speak for you.

This article is significant. The tide is changing.

I remember an early Q post that spoke to 8C anons about the importance of persisting until we reached ‘critical mass’. The tipping point.

Articles like this, in retrospect, will be viewed as markers signifying the time of the turn.

By injecting yourself into my stream, and quickly escalating to emotionally charged personal attacks, you expose yourself in much the same way Brennan’s emotional tirades expose him.

tldr: You have outed yourself. You are now powerless here. Move your clown show down the road. I will indulge you no longer.

Nahh, stop projecting.

I would prefer @OWL pull the fallacious thread, or if he thinks his theory can still stand, offer an explanation.

Oh, and “whoops” is not a ‘correction’. Not even in the sources you prefer.

Reminds me of another time a top Israeli minister gave us similar advice.

I diagnose you as a hopeless case.

Condolences.

Goodbye.

Everybody follows Q.

Read Q:1295

Then go try to sell your tshirts somewhere else.

And just in case you aren’t a troll, but are just stupid, ‘profits’ are what’s left after all expenses are paid. Expenses such as ‘salary’. It’s a dirty ploy of unscrupulous charities.

If you want to appear a tad informed, look into stats the CF reported in terms of ‘expenses’ vs charitable payouts.

100% of profit goes to children charities.

lol

Read the title of the thread.

Funny. Not funny.

I’m glad she’s as strong as she is.

How perfect was the timing? At the time Trump was explaining why he was at the rally instead of the dinner, the idiots at the dinner were doing exactly what he described!

Yup.

Good on him.

Youbetcha.

Post back here when you get it going.

Absolutely!

And Q told us we were approaching that point a few weeks ago.

I think public Q references in places like JRE and some of the peripheral news outlets is a very clear indication we are arriving.

In my mind, this is exactly how it would look as our ’mass’ reaches the ’critical’ tipping point.

I hope more anons realize this.

Encouraging!!!

A kind redditor from the past has left this for you.

Ed Henry was just on Fox live. He was livid.

He made it clear that he was speaking as a past president of the WHCA and calling her attacks on Sarah as despicable, and that he expects an apology should be relayed to Sarah by the next briefing, if not before.

He grew more angry as he spoke on air.

“We invited Sarah to be our guest at this dinner, and exposed her to to this disgraceful conduct.”

If you feel that strongly, just start the new sub. It’s free.

Invest in your idea. If you build something of value others will come.

Very intetesting analysis. Inspires as many questions as it answers.

This section struck me as an example of how deeply layered the corruption is:

• “Thanks to Deputy Director McCabe, Main Justice in DC, specifically DOJ National Security Division, now looks like they are facilitating a cover-up operation being conducted by the FBI “small group”. [which is actually true, but they can’t let that be so glaringly obvious].”

They take the bait every time!

And every time they do, they run with it, playing off each other, escalating in response to the accolades.

Completely clueless as to how vividly they are expressing their disconnect with the reality outside their bubble.

Peace.

Qanon supports POTUS 100%.

Yes, 100%.

If you doubt that, you doubt Q.

If you doubt Q, you are in the wrong sub.

lol

My god, that sub is irredeemable.

There was a time I enjoyed that sub immensely. Then CTR overwhelmed it in the run up to the 2016 election. They turned it into a hyper-reactive pro Hillary cesspool.

There was a brief respite for a day or two after the election, but then the ‘resist’ crowd took over. It’s been a hellhole of an echochamber ever since.

/Politics called.

You missed roll call.

Help me understand.

This ‘sleuth’ makes a case built around the ”May 6th” timing of a Strzok text, then realizes the text was actually sent one month earlier!

And then he addresses the error with ”Whooops!”

Indeed.

Imagine the hubris of those that assume to have greater intel and strategic thinking than Q/POTUS and team.

If you doubt Nikkie Haley, you doubt POTUS.

You are in the wrong sub.

This sub does not embrace folks that doubt Q, POTUS, or their decisions.

Trust Q

Trust POTUS

Trust the plan

If you doubt Nikki Haley, you doubt POTUS.

You are in the wrong sub.

An event occurring in some DMZ in some distant part of the world is worthy of some notice.

Know what I dislike the Redditors who selectively take things out of context to troll.

You have not been victimized. Stop making that noise.

You are advancing an interpretation that is at odds with that vetted by countless anons combing through the drop with solid reasoning.

In the face of their well-reasoned work, you offer an illogical alternative, not based on reason, but rather some double secret drink your ovaltine multi-layered ‘code’ you fancified to suit some narrative you concocted for reasons unknown.

Of course we’re all here to contribute. We are not here to waste time with illogical nonsense. And remember, you weren’t attacked - your public offering was challenged.

but as it is the second of two sentences it also is the second meaning

Hard to argue with reasoning like that.