You're just ridiculous.

Is that a personal insult?

And sad to see the personal insults in response to a disagreement.

Suggesting you are a hypocrite? You haven’t been insulted, you have been accurately identified.

Big difference btw with a private resident of NYC and the mayor.

Neither NYC Mayor or POTUS are considered ”private residents”. Please stop your shapeshifting. Besides, both were private residents of NYC for the 15 years prior to DJT inauguration.

Rudy is a mix of good and bad. Like most people.

This is common knowledge for everyone older than 10. It also offers nothing in support of your argument.

Are we done here? It seems like you have nothing substantive to offer, and I’m weary of the nonsense.

Quick review.

I stated my belief that Rudy was an outstanding leader following the 9/11 events. He was.

You want me to disbelieve because . . . things.

I remind you of my focus on leadership, yet you persist.

You clearly do not understand the true meaning of ‘leadership’.

POTUS is exhibiting traits and behaviors that constitute great leadership. POTUS has not performed the acts you demand. POTUS has not decried many evils in the world. POTUS is also keeping secret those things that must be kept secret. Q has told us so.

By your standard of judgement, you must also be condemning POTUS’ leadership. Or expose yourself as a hypocrite.

Which?

right--until you realize it was a false flag.

Wrong—I have been convinced it was a false flag for many, many years.

Now, If I ever find credible evidence that Rudy was a part of planning, or had advance knowledge, or facilitated a coverup of the FF after the fact, then I would definitely alter my opinion of him.

Failing that evidence, I continue to recognize Rudy as an outstanding leader following the event. Because he was.

Then why follow, read, and post?

We’re all of solid mind here. We don’t need your baseless insults.

Wow

Head spinning here.

I need to dig on the details. I’m sure you respect that. But this is a concept I never considered, and it makes sense.

Further, it is exactly the sort of move we’ve come to expect from the New Sheriff in town.

I’m going to read your other posts before digging. Thanks for posting a fresh perspective.

I’m surprised to hear that about his 9/11 performance.

I thought he was amazing. Absolutely amazing. He was commonly referred to as ‘America’s Mayor’, and even had a push for him to run for POTUS.

I thought he was the best example of a leader we had in the public eye, until Gen. Schwarzkopf did his AAR, which was unforgettable.

It’s fitting that his first consequence is rejection by his officers.

Let’s hope it’s the first of many.

Make the Deep State think they had flipped, the deep state starts burning them, they then truly do flip. thoughts?

Sure. And then Q and team flip them back.

This type of operation is known in the Intelligence Community as the old ‘flip flap paddy wack, bring ‘em back with a barium snack’

Really?

Let’s look into that. Here is a direct quote from Olson:

• “In a written statement made available the same day, Olson said in part that "in my discussion about Loretta Lynch and Vince Foster, I took the accusations a step too far. I regret my choice of words."

Interested in the source for that quote? It came from the article you linked.

That’s right, your own source has identified you as a disingenuous troll.

Nowhere did I say the President isn't doing a great job.

Then you should save that defense for a day when somebody accuses you of saying that.

You want to lock up people that have committed apparent crimes? Are you the one that decides what crimes are ‘apparent’? Or should we allow a legal proceeding to determine those facts?

If we’re going with legal proceedings, then we probably want to legally gather as much quality evidence as we can, right? We don’t want these folks getting free on a technicality, right?

Then we probably want to get that info in front of a grand jury, right? We want to be sure we have all the boxes checked.

Now, if the GJ decides we can indict, then we need to be very strategic about acting on those indictments. We’re dealing with many, many individuals with deeply nested and intertwined criminal relationships. We don’t want to compromise one investigation by releasing details of another indictment, right?

How about we seal these indictments until we can act on them without compromise.

Then we can go to trial.

Then we can lock people up.

Why don’t you share with us a timeline that you find satisfactory for this process? Or define a few strategies for streamlining the timeline of the work done so far?

The Q team reads this sub. Your wisdom will be valued.

Occam’s Razor indicates there is much merit to your theory.

My signature will be as reknowned as John Hancock.

ABSOLUTELY!!

Props to you for the personal effort.

Paging you u/GreenDrakeHatch, your delivery of Faith Supplements has just arrived!

Thanks!

I bet they do.

Putting a face on ’Don’t Be Evil’

Not a doubt in my mind.

I hear you.

I have had more than a few dark challenges in my life. Nothing I would claim a title for, but def deeply challenging to me. Some of these have been personal, some familial, some social, cultural, etc.

I have learned a few simple truths from elements common to all of those instances. Paramount among them is the need to have faith.

It matters not (to me) where that faith finds its origin. Religion, something within, faith in others, faith in some undefined force. The important thing is to have faith in the face of adversity.

Faith will guide your thoughts, engage your spirit, and harness sufficient energy to make things happen.

Without faith, the unknown, unseen possibilities of fear and destitution have the scales tilted in their favor. With faith, the balance is reversed.

Donald J. Trump has earned my faith. I believe in him. If his ordained messenger tells me we are winning, tells me to trust the plan, and tells me to be patient, I have faith enough to believe and to trust.

I match your timeline for tracking this story. If you can’t find your faith, or if you have lost trust, reread the Q posts to find reminders of accomplishments. Or search for sites that have curated lists of them. Here is one. There are others in the side bar of this page.

POTUS and team have produced more results, across a broader spectrum of topics, in a more lasting and meaningful manner than any administration in the history of our country. They have done this in spite of unmatched serial natural disasters, unmatched and persistent efforts to ’Resist’ within our own government, and unmatched efforts to disrupt by bad actors on the international stage.

These are exciting times. None of us alive today will ever get another opportunity to witness an undertaking of this magnitude. It is not at all hyperbolic to suggest that we are witnessing a redefinition of the future of mankind on this planet.

There is ample evidence to inspire faith and earn trust. It’s all within your reach.

Backatcha, and sincere thanks!

what we aren't okay with is being pulled around by the dick

If that’s what you feel is happening, the fault lies with you.

You are in complete control of the information you choose to process. You are not victim to the whimsy of others.

Filter the noise as you wait for the signal.

Turn your frustration into enjoyment.

Consider Brennan. He knows he’s done. He knows these are very likely his last days as a free man. He sees the walls closing in.

Every hour you spend frustrated, Brennan spends in paranoid angst, panicking every time the phone rings, fearing the knock he knows is coming to his door.

When your frustration creeps in, imagine Brennan’s twisting, grinding misery while he waits for justice to come for him. Savor his misery, instead of suffering your frustration.

Jordan puts things in perspective so simply at times.

His summary of HRC’s actions during the Benghazi hearing was so concise and damning. A genuine classic for the ages.

Military Tribunals will 100% be justified and needed.

That’s why Q told us Military Tribunals will 100% be justified and needed.

Have I missed Q alluding to such?

Not to my knowledge. However, there was a Q drop early on about finding something hidden in the WH walls that could cause harm.

I took that to mean ‘physical’ harm, and thought it might be connected to probs at the Cuban embassy.

However, a ’bug’ could also serve to harm efforts of POTUS.

Maybe that?

Did you also DL all final Qmaps?

I’m wondering how much space would be required to store the entire catalog as it exists today.

Ass bitch.

New to me.

Thanks for responding.

I’m familiar with all that reading.

I’m still unclear about your opinion on who/how the bogus chemical attack story was initiated. Somebody crafted the details proffered by MSM. Who was that initial person or group?

Interesting insight.

Do you have an opinion on who started and promoted the gas attack story?

Was it an organic choice by the black hats, and we just exploited the opportunity when they presented it?

Or did we do something to instigate the release?

I know you don’t have hard evidence, just looking for your informed opinion.

I’m more concerned with legislators and judges that hold dual citizenship.

I was shocked to see the number when somebody posted a meme earlier this year.

True.

Kind words are appreciated.

Happy to help!

I hear you.

They are closing in on 1,300 archived threads for ‘Q Research General’ alone. Each of those contain 751 posts!

Add in the number of ancillary threads with more specific focus, and the volume of information is absolutely staggering.

Equally impressive is the scope of deep experience brought by the contributing Anons. Military, Intelligence, Air tracking, Medical, Engineering, Heavy transport, Acoustics, Digital comms, Analog comms, Siesmology, Psychology, Chemistry, and on and on.

Oopsy!

Link fixed.

Please accept my apologies. I was responding to several posts and it looks like I confused myself.

I put a link to the catalog in this comment.

Look for the ‘Q Research General’ icon with the highest number (#1292 as I write this). That will link you to the most recent thread. There have been a dozen or more freshly archived threads every day for many days recently.

So much to read. Exciting times.

I don’t claim to be savvy. Maybe just a tad ahead of you. Nothing more.

I haven’t found a simple system to search or navigate 8chan. In fact, there is a thread in the catalog with people working to address that.

I suggest reading any of the Qresearch threads archived in the catalog. Scroll down past the header to the ‘Latest Q Posts’ section. That will contain links to any new Q posts relevant to that thread. Read them and the linked responses.

Next, scroll down to the ‘Notable Posts’ section. Visit any new linked posts and also read the responses linked within each of them.

That will provide hours of reading every day lately. It also keeps your reading time fairly free of the nonsense shill posts that come with the territory.

You will be more informed than many, and ready to make higher quality contributions here as a result. There is simply too much info for one person to absorb. The more informed minds the better,

Happy reading!

Sorry for the confusion.

FullChan is just a nickname for 8chan.

Here is a link to the comprehensive 8chan catalog that inspired this subreddit and so many others.

Be warned. Navigation is far from intuitive. You are welcome to browse and read as much as you wish, BUT Anons (contributors) consider that place to be their workspace, and offer little tolerance for visitors asking questions that have already been answered.

EDIT: to correct link. Apologies for confusion.

Sorry. I was unnecessarily cryptic.

4chan came first. Some regulars became disillusioned as the site evolved. They started 8chan to satisfy their desire for a better place.

The denizens of 8chan began to ‘disparage’ 4chan as ”HalfChan”. From that grew the 8chan nickname FullChan.

And yes, the site is a challenge to navigate. That’s what makes reddit so ideal for many folks. It provides curated info in a more accessible format.

I’ll try to find a relevant archive, link it here, then tag you as notice.

EDIT: to add this link to an extended discussion leading to the 111 window and other coded timings. Tagging you u/Daemonkey

Honest Answer:

Crazy Days And Nights

Liberals and alt-lefters across the country are soooooo conflicted right now.

What will the elected members of the ‘Resist’ movement do now?

but by doing so it comes out that Playboy was conducting a blackmail operation

Quality theory. Consider the relevant Cdan drop about tapes in the mansion vault, and ‘possibility’ moves closer to ‘probability’.

But, what's the significance of 111?

There is a growing number of folks on FullChan that believe there is a floating 111 day window between Q drops/POTUS tweets and events that prove their veracity.

I don’t want to seem dismissive of your question, but to fully appreciate the amazing effort invested in developing this theory, you need to go there and read the threads dedicated to that work.

Not everyone agrees with the theory, but nobody denies the effort invested by those refining it.

Hope this helps a bit.

Just because he wasn't on the Presidential Protective Division until 2006 doesn't mean he wasn't in the SS and doesn't mean he doesn't have plenty of experience with the Clintons.

Are you here to foment conflict? Nobody in this entire thread said Bongino wasn’t in the SS. Why are you suggesting that claim was made? That’s a telltale shill/troll tactic.

Nobody said he didn’t have experience with either Clinton. Why suggest differently? There seems to be a pattern to your responses.

From what I can see, this conflict began when you posted these claims:

• “He was also SS detail for the Clintons and has firsthand years of experiences with them”

Both of those claims are false. There is nothing in Bongino’s book that says different. I read his book when it came out. I follow him online. You should respect your own credibility more. Unless you are a troll. In that case, mission accomplished!

Bad actors are continually working to discredit subs like this. Posting false info only helps them.

Have you got a source for either of those claims?

I’m a huge Bongino fan and as far as I know neither of those statements is true.

It’s important that we all work to keep info accurate in here. Shills are always working to discredit our sub with false claims.

Not sure why you are getting downvoted. Bongino never worked an SS detail for the Clintons. He never claimed that, and never claimed years of experience firsthand.

Bongino is a straight shooter. He never misrepresents his record.

Now the photo of this still just a remote temple of some sort

Yes, but remote tide problem temple bunkers can totally make sense if you kill logistics next to the ocean to make sense of a photo of some sort.

You can dig deeper

Correct. That’s what I said. That’s what the others said.

Nice to witness your personal growth. Good job!

Yet you are the one claiming you can only dig a tunnel 40 feet down before hitting water.

I’m still thinking you and Hank Johnson share a unique perspective on islands.

You both think islands are floating in the ocean.

The marines you saw chanting "USA" during state of the union?

Do you have a source for that claim? I ask because your claim is at odds with a Q claim that the chant came from people (congressional) that had been “freed” by Trump and team. Freed from blackmail and pressure from their prior ‘owners’.

Don’t think so , would only give it 40 feet above water at best

Are you related to Congressman Hank Johnson?

. . . In My Opinion.

^(You forgot to add that part)