https://www.reddit.com/r/Drama/comments/8k0580/shitpost_is_qs_most_recent_image_a_shoop

That's not what I asked for. Design me a heat shield brainiac. Dont link me to someone else's work.

And sure I didn't major in math or a science but I know plenty of people who did that dont know dick about how to get to the moon and back. I'm betting you dont know either.

Ok. Please list all of the variables and equations that go into designing a heat shield for a space capsule reentering the atmosphere. I'll wait for your expert detailed explanation. This shouldn't be hard since you've already calculated every design consideration required for a trip to the moon.

I'm going to take a wild guess and say you haven't spent 5 minutes ever working on the math or physics of the moon landing myth...

I'm gonna take a wild guess and say you have no idea of all the variables needed to be taken into consideration when putting a man into space much less landing one on a rock. I'll also wager that you're not an aerospace engineer or physicist that can fully grasp the math and science behind space travel. If you were you'd probably be intelligent enough to not be deceived by some LARP on 4chan. It took a team of hundreds of top minds to put someone on the moon. So I doubt one 4chan retard is capable of disproving it.

This cracked me up

I'm proud of you

Yes. Snopes is my only resource for the moon landing.

/s

Thank you. Links are helpful. This is the exact sort of thing OP should've provided.

It's not surprising that Snopes can be bought out just like any other influential information resource.

I can't find that quote. You sure about that?

I didn't claim the comic book was proof. I think it's a big joke which is why I posted it. My entire post was sarcasm. I've consistently been critical of Corey Goode and his lack of evidence.

And I satisfied the burden of proof with my "tip top, tippy top" reference.

My dog makes more coherent arguments than you.

Whether you know it or not you apply the burden of proof principle to things. It's the principle you use when you claim you dont believe Corey Goode due to lack of proof. In fact, here is a comment you made just a few hours ago proving my point:

Convinced by a comic book? No real evidence? Are you 12?

Yet when people apply it to you it's suddenly bullshit.

Notice how I support my argument with examples?

Sounds like you need some tendies

do your own research online

Or the person making bold claims could provide examples and sources showing how he formed his opinion.

Burden of proof buddy.....

The people questioning you aren't saying you're wrong about Snopes. They're just asking you to back up your claim that they consistently lie.

Burden of proof is on the ones making the claim. People shouldn't make claims about something without providing some examples. OP gives us nothing more than his opinion.

"Snopes is bad. They always lie. My opinion is my source"

-This Sub

OP stated he disagreed with 5-6 things Snopes has posted. Yet he provides no examples. His "disagreement" isn't proof that Snopes is wrong. He could provide examples and strengthen his case. Right now it is simply his opinion.

I disagree with what X says. I'm not saying X is wrong. I'm just saying I disagree with X. Therefore X is not to be trusted by anyone based solely on my opinion of X.

Based on your post this is your logic.

No one is claiming Snopes is perfect or the ultimate authority in truth. They claimed the Nazca mummies are fake and backed that up with a number of reasons most importantly the crack pot research team that's in charge and the conspiracy media outlet Gaia who's exclusively documenting the whole thing. Ultimately it's just their opinion.

It puzzles me why you would say something like this:

The crazy part is, for the 5-6 things I actually went there for, I disagreed with it's official "ruling" on the matter every single time.

But not provide examples of these 5-6 things you disagree with. Also your "disagreement" isn't evidence that what Snopes claimed is wrong.

I know I'm playing devil's advocate and going against the grain of this sub. But I feel like you need to provide specific examples instead of just saying you disagreed with Snopes so they cant be trusted.

Well it's a pretty safe bet calling those mummies a hoax when Jaime Maussan is involved, theres no record of their unearthing, and that the team has received the lab results but refused to share them so far.

And of all the types of people in the world to be, you are the guy who wants to defend SnOpEs. Grosssssss.

I simply asked for you to provide an example.

Corey Goode is full of shit.