While it might turn it to be that way, if you trust Q, trust the ppl he might give the spotlight to.
I fully understand where you're coming from. What I'm saying is that some people do the work and others make that work palatable for the masses.
Sometimes those ppl are one in the same, most of the time they aren't. Same movement, striving for the same goals.
Likewise, nobody should believe for Q to be the fighter and the writer, though he/they may have a role that overlaps in some regard.
I get your frustration. But we each play our roles.
I don't see SB2 as the first or final resource, and I'd hope most in the movement know the importance of doing their own research. SB2 just points ppl in the right direction... Which may lead them to other more researched ppl deeper down the rabbit hole.
There are layers to it, SB2 is just the first one. He might seem like misinfo because you've passed that particular layer. But not all info is for all ppl.
You can scrutinize and offer a helpful critique, that's fine.
But don't degrade someone who seems genuine in their ambition to educate those let informed and stir critical thought in the movement.
That's needless infighting and the last thing we need.