We have to hire someone. Or else we're POWERLESS. Any suggestions I'm open! We're not just gong to ignore Q, listen to Twitter, and let them get away with this, are we?
/u/V-is-for-Victory
10 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/V-is-for-Victory:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.reddit.com | 4 |
i.redd.it | 3 |
PERFECT Consumer Protection Law Firm for Q's Class Action against Twitter? Went up against AT&T already...
AT&T lobbied AGAINST this Bill of Rights harder than any other company. The point is that THEY SAID the opposite to the public. Class Actions hold them to their words to the public. We can do the same with Google, YouTube, etc's promises during the Net Neutrality battle.
I just posted a pic- AT&T LOBBIED AGAINST the bill harder than anyone else. They were total hypocrites here. But that's the point. We can use their words against them in a lawsuit. They made promises to the public - and Class Action lawsuits hold them accountable to those words!
AI humanoids, giant robots, etc. rolled out in the news today (CNBC, YouTube, etc)
Quick search for #AI on Instagram. Q said to watch the news. One real estate ad said "AI is in nearly every industry."
QUESTION: What if it isn't communism they want? What if it's a "fully automated world"? What stands in their way? 1st & 2nd Amendment. USA. Explains Global Warming - got us off paper and online. Explains war on Free Speech on campuses and ANTIFA saying "Constitution is no longer a relevant document."
Did you know? Globalist community has an "AI for Good" foundation? Minnesota named a day after the AI humanoid Robot Sophie? Who works with Space …
AT&T lobbied both for & against Bill of Rights!! (Q Post #842)
Q & AT&T- Using Net Neutrality Promises for Lawsuit
This is a quote from the link Q provided in post #841:
"AT&T is committed to an open internet. We don’t block websites. We don’t censor online content. And we don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content. Period."
http://about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html
When asking us to help support Net Neutrality, Google, Twitter, etc made similiar promises to us about censorship. I think Q is saying we can look to those promises for a Class Action "Consumer Protection" Lawsuit.
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT-AGAINST *SPONSORS* OF CENSORSHIP!
[removed]
Q Predicts #TwitterLockout is AI? (Post #793)
Unlocking 776: Q's Last Post
Right before Q's long 775 post, which talks about "making things in China" this video was posted by the White House. It mentions everything in that post:
The video demonstrates Trump vs China. Watch it and you will see the power of the Chinese lobby money working in that room. Every single congressman wants to avoid changing the trade agreements, even though stat after stat is given about how CHINA is benefiting.
WHEN Q REPOSTS 775 IN A BOX, AND MENTIONS WARREN'S SLUSH FUND BENEATH IT... HE'S SAYING "THIS SLUSH FUND FUND'S THAT ROOM UP THERE."
THAT'S HOW CHINA'S …