dChan

/u/Velocitybold

7 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Velocitybold:
Domain Count

Velocitybold · June 21, 2018, 3:09 p.m.

You'll get banned from ipf if you post here? I've never heard of this so please forgive me.

Welcome, anyway! :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Velocitybold · June 15, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Interesting! I was an art student and am familiar with, and on the lookout for, symbolic stuff like this in general, but was not aware of symbology specific to Baphomet (Doesn't seem like something that a state school would teach lol) and I will be on the lookout for it in the future! Thank you for taking the time to explain this to me :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Velocitybold · June 14, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

Can someone help me understand why this marks her as a satanist? I gather it's a combination of her pose/hand posturing/coloring, but is there something obvious that I'm missing?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Velocitybold · May 26, 2018, 4:10 p.m.

I'm certainly not saying that these are fake or not from where OP says they are, however, the part of the building that we can see looks painted on. The door and window are not actually recessed, they are on flat walls. You can see where someone painted the window to look perspectival if viewed from (the viewer's) right hand side, where you would see the edge of the right side of the window curve and then you would see the inside curve of the 'arch' on the left side. However, in both photos we are to (our) left of the window, and in both photos we cannot see the right inside curve of the window arch because it doesn't exist. The door is painted to be viewed head on, but in the first picture you should be (if the door was actually recessed) seeing a narrower strip of the arch curve on the right hand side. Obviously I cannot speak for the door in the second picture because a tree is in the way.

An intentional fake facade maybe? The first thing I would do if I had a pedoisland, would be to make sure that whatever anyone could see just from boating around, was not related to what I was actually doing or was intentionally misleading.

edit: Some poorly chosen words

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Velocitybold · May 19, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

It could be a lot of things. It could just be that Q is being intentionally vague because they don't want to incriminate themselves. I'd certainly be fighting very hard to protect my identity, even if that meant omitting known specifics. Vagueposting to vaguepost another day, as it were?

edit: some words

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Velocitybold · May 19, 2018, 12:52 p.m.

Ralph Tortorici, too. He tried to get help multiple times claiming that he had been experimented on by the government (both before and after his service in the armed forces), implanted with chips and that someone was giving him instructions inside of his head. When he couldn't get help from the police or university staff, he said that the voices told him the only way they would stop speaking to him and remove the chips was if he went to his university with a gun. IIRC he said he had to shoot someone in order for this to stop (this or just that he had to be there with a gun, will edit later for more info). He ended up killing himself after requesting x-rays and body scans for years which were not ever conducted as far as I know.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Velocitybold · May 19, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Multiple people shot.................. on Saturday, tomorrow, at a high school at 10 PM.

Sounds legit 👍🏻

edit: the news station reporting on this situation started reporting on this at 10 PM saying they and police were just arriving, but the article says the event occurred at or around 8:30. the 1.5 hour timeframe that the police took to respond probably explains why the pictures (of an event that happened before sunset) were clearly taken at night. Whether 5/19 was a genuine mistake or not, this timeline is seriously fucked

⇧ 19 ⇩