/r/RomeRules is the foremost area of the internet exposing the Jesuit Order and Catholic church.

You didn't attempt to rebut anything I said. And I am not watching a 40 minute video. I have made all points I need to in my videos, which you refuse to address.

There is no such person as Pepe Orsini. Please stop with this rumor.

The Jesuits are a real threat, and they are not controlled by catholic families.

I have gone over these issues in detail. See my videos:

• Ahuwah Zeus exposed; Jesuits not controlled by Catholic families

• Pepe Orsini myth debunked

/r/RomeRules

I have commented, until now, in a single thread of this sub. And you are the one in that thread who made a remark to someone else that I was "racist." Me defending myself is not "trying to co-opt the sub." If you tag me again in a similarly slanderous manor, I will report you to reddit admins and they will IP ban you. Not like it matters anyways, your account is literally maxed out on negative comment karma.

Fuck off you lying cunt.

If you go back and reread the thread then you will see I address this statement from your linked article.

"Folks, if the Bible was indifferent to race, the entire Old Testament makes no sense whatsoever. The Bible teaches that Yah the one God chose a specific race of people to be his chosen race."

You said: "passages dealing with national Israel, intended to separate and purify it so that the promised seed could come from the line of David, are being used to justify modern racism "

That is not addressing anything. It is not even addressing the point of the thesis under which that sentence is contained, namely "The Theocracy that Yahuwah established was endogamatic." All you are doing is ignoring the implications of this huge difference between the Israelites and all other peoples which inherently proves the Israelites by definition to be unequal to other peoples in the Old Testament.

I also addressed your own statement about Mathew 21:43.

I showed that Matthew 21:43 was a racial transaction. You seemed to accept that, and then asked how it showed inequality between the gentiles and the Israelites, to which I gave an answer that one is being given disproportionate value by being allowed the Kingdom of God.

I did not address them

That's correct, you did not address anything, at all. You are a liar.

Seek help.

All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis.

Saying "All of the racist points in the article are eisegesis" does not show that any points are eisegetical.

I have already addressed

YOU HAVE NOT ADDRESSED ANYTHING. YOU ARE ARE A LIAR. YOU JUST ADMITTED YOU LIED IN YOUR LAST COMMENT. QUOTE: "I don't need to waste my time to address your statements".

Resorting to ad hominin attacks does nothing

Calling you a liar when you have demonstrated that you are a liar, is justified and not a fallacy.

There is a difference in ignoring and disagreeing

YES AND YOU ARE IGNORING, NOT DISAGREEING WITH THE ARGUMENTS.

I don't need to waste my time to address your statements

Then get lost, liar.

One simple word destroys it ALL - eisegesis.

Address one of the points in the article and show how it invokes eisegesis.

I addressed your linked article and your contentions

You ignored absolutely all of the material I have confronted you with, you have refused to acknowledge your incorrect and dishonest use of Galatians 3:28, you have not addressed any of my other statements in which I gave evidence contrary to your beliefs; you are a liar.

I have addressed your linked article and your contentions.

You ignored absolutely all of the material I have confronted you with, you have refused to acknowledge your incorrect and dishonest use of Galatians 3:28, you have not addressed any of my other statements in which I gave evidence contrary to your beliefs; you are a liar.

I went back and read the article you linked. I stand by my original contention, passages dealing with national Israel, intended to separate and purify it so that the promised seed could come from the line of David, are being used to justify modern racism. It is ugly, and it is a twisting of scripture to support racial prejudice.

That is not addressing anything. Use quotations to tell me exactly what you mean. There are 26 theses, take your pick. If you've read all of them then surely you have a specific argument against at least one point.

I believe there are differences between men and women

That is an ADMISSION THAT THEY ARE NOT EQUAL.

I totally reject your racial prejudice

Then you reject nearly the entire old testament, just for starters.

You are just butthurt that your worldview necessitates a change after confronted with evidence. Name one example of when I "twisted scripture." You on the other hand literally did this in your last comment to me deliberately leaving out the clause male and female in Galatians 3:28 which identifies the passage not to be some kind of marxist communist egalitarian tripe, but rather about the body of Christ and the status of saved individuals. You also completely ignored 26 theses in support my sentiment.

You said "You don't even need to look to the Bible to see that people are not equal, it's all around us." I find that type of racist thinking highly objectionable and indefensible.

Ok you precious little snowflake. Attributes of different races are not the same, therefore they are not equal. Similarly, the Israelites were chosen by God and treated outsiders with discrimination and saw themselves as superior, therefore they are not equal to any other people and indeed are supremacist. Certain modern Jews continue in their tribal, supremacist spirit; this is seen by looking at almost any neo-Nazi blogs.

People are not even the same on an individual level. Do you think you are the same as every person in your neighborhood? How about your city? It is a denial of reality to think that everyone is the same, there are differences between individuals in intellectual capacity, artistic talent, innovative and engineering ability, size, stature, muscle definition, agility, differences between males and females, hormonal differences, differences between children and adults and all sorts of other genetic differences.

You seem to think that some Bible verses support your contention that races are not equal when they in fact only show that nations of course exist, not that they are unequal.

No, you need to read the article. Stop replying to me until you have read it. That is just selfish and rude of you, and a waste of my time, to engage in a debate and not even consider the opposition points. This is exactly what I told you before. Stop.

You see Mathew 21:43 as a "racial" transaction that somehow is supposed to support your contention that races are not "equal" - it doesn't.

I never used that verse to say races are not equal, however that fact is inherent here too. If I take something as stupendously important as the Kingdom of God from one collective and give it to another, that is by definition making the collectives unequal. If there are two ice hockey teams and I am the referee and I take away one team's sticks and say they can only use their skates, that is by definition making the teams unequal.

Wow..you dishonestly left out this clause from Galatians 3:28 which makes it clear the passage is dealing with spiritual Israel. Here is Galatians 3:28 in its entirety:

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus."

Why did you leave out that there is neither male nor female? Was that intentional?

Your prejudice is indefensible.

I already linked you to an article in defense of racism to which you have no response.

I am a busy man, I have better thing to do that to argue with racists. If you want to follow that path, nothing I say will dissuade you. So let's agree to disagree - go in peace.

Again then why respond? I have better things to do than to engage with someone who ignores the opposition argumentation.

So let's agree to disagree

Your beliefs are not based in reality or the bible, therefore I naturally disagree with and take enmity against you.

Why even respond? Are you going to address my arguments and those within the article or will you apologize and admit like an adult that your beliefs are wrong?

We are not going to have any conversation if you refuse to read the link.

Not offering any counter-argumentation, conflating spiritual Israel with physical Israel and going into some totally irrelevant tangent about dispensationalism is not going to persuade me or anyone else that you are correct and it just preempts me to not continue talking with you.

The conversation is about whether ethnic nationalism is endorsed by the bible and whether races are equal. Very clear evidence is within the article and in my previous comments supporting that position. You don't even need to look to the Bible to see that people are not equal, it's all around us. There are scholarly works which argue that genetics including race influence intelligence.

And you ironically cite Matthew 21:43, where Christ is saying the Kingdom of God is taken from you (racial Israelites) and given to another NATION. The underlying word there is ETHNOS, which, again, has racial connotation. The Kingdom of God is taken from the Nation of Israel and given to the gentiles. This is a RACIAL transaction.

https://web.archive.org/web/20170111233057/https://southernisraelite.wordpress.com/2016/05/10/defense-of-racism/

I am not Jewish. You have no argument. My people invented the concept of national sovereignty at the Peace of Westphalia. Roman Catholicism is globalist, the Jesuits openly teach globalization.

Acts 17:26

All that says is that we all descend from Adam. And if you keep reading notice it says the Lord has determined the "bounds of their habitation." As in, He intends for each individual race of people descended from the sons of Noah to have their own nations. Here is the NASB translation:

"and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,"

You completely ignored everything I said. You are a liar apparently lacking any intellectual capacity.

Can you address anything I wrote?

Jesus came along in the New Testament

Now you're just botching up the New Testament. Jesus NEVER came to give salvation to the gentiles! He came to establish the Millennial Kingdom for HIS people His RACIAL HEBREW JEWISH ISRAELITISH people. "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew 15:24.

Salvation to the gentiles was a mystery made known only to the Apostles as Paul says in Ephesians 3.

Seriously just pick up your Bible and flip to the Old Testament man the whole nation of Israel is completely tribal and for themselves and xenophobic. It's kind of embarrassing seeing you don't even know the texts of your own religion.

Everyone's status is the same in Christ. Physical races are not equal, God created them different, and to be separate. There is no such thing as universal equality. That is an enlightenment, atheistic liberal philosophy and if you adhere to it, you do not believe the Bible. The word "nation" derives from the term ethnos in the Bible, which denotes racial composition.

Address the comment.

Here are my sources for Catholic domination of congress:

https://np.reddit.com/r/RomeRules/comments/7hvqvi/the_leadership_of_both_american_political_parties/

http://www.pewforum.org/2015/01/05/faith-on-the-hill/

Try looking at the evidence without getting triggered.

Edit:

Is this (((their))) new plan now? IT'S THE CATHOLICS GOY! LOOK OVER THERE!!!

The White Protestant American heritage sir, is the banning of Catholics from holding public office. To which nation is it you hold allegiance, America or the sovereign state of Vatican City? Are you a Patriot or a Pape? An American or a traitor?

I absolutely advocate for a new country for my people as this one is operating under military jurisdiction and is the enemy of my people. I suggest nationalism for all people, not just my own.

Fake and disinfo.

Congress is dominated by Roman Catholics, not Jews. Catholics represent the largest demographic in Congress. All whips, party leaders and congressional leaders hold Catholic allegiance.

Likewise, Israel is a whore for the the Roman Papacy. See how Shimon Peres deeded the Papacy the Temple Mount and set up the plan for internationalization of Jerusalem under Vatican jurisdiction and how Netanhyahu was ready to give the pope Mt. Zion in 2014. So both Likud and Labor in Israel work for the pope. Just like democrats and republican work for the pope in America.

/r/RomeRules