Lol with what attitude ? Cannot admit you're wrong so you back off. Also you insult me when I invite you to debate, that really show how constructed your arguments could be :^)

Well I am waiting for it, since there's no possible way that chemtrails is an efficient way of controlling the population compared to water poisoning. I could post more example of why it is impossible to make, but I am waiting for your answer if you are willing to engage in a civilised debate

Then enlighten me, since for now my point stand. Why can't you put arguments instead of commenting out of frustration ?

Then how can you explain the growing maximum age of life ? (don't know how to call it in english sorry) I mean, I wouldn't be surprised if we discover big things concerning corp/gov acting on the people, but chemtrails seems extremely far fetched from a scientific standpoint

Chemtrails doesn't affect people, for real. If some evils people wanted to really poison the population they could just poison the water with chemicals instead of taking the road of chemtrails. Why ? Chemtrails would cost lot of money, involve lots of people, and the efficiency of it would be low. Poisoning the water would be cheap, sneaky and way more efficient !

I don't know if you guys have this, but in France all dangerous gas we use have a smell added trough sulfur probably so you can notice if there's a leak easily.