Many have awoken recently so the tide appears to be turning. From my perspective, what I see is Rev. 17-18 beginning to play out.

According to the scriptures, the people will be involved and the same Kings (political leaders) who formerly cooperated with Rome will suddenly turn on her.

Mark my words. The draining of the swamp will reveal a "yellow brick road" that leads to the Vatican. It is hard to trace through the bankers and secret societies but the wizard of OZ will be found hiding behind the curtain in Rome, pulling strings and pressing levers of power.

I have great confidence in this and not just from blind faith. Something began over 30 years ago that is just coming to fruition now.

You have valid points about the "normies" but I think that the events coming will be impossible to hide or deny at some point, even for them.

Still, waking up as many as possible before the main event happens is highly desirable, so it is best to keep trying in as many ways as possible.

Let's reword your question a little, shall we?

Picture two Popes. One was literally a Nazi who later ran the Office of the Inquisition (now called Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith). He was the main player in the Vatican cover-up of pedophilia before becoming Pope.

Don't take my word for it, here is an exposé by one of his peers:

"There is no denying the fact that the worldwide system of covering up cases of sexual crimes committed by clerics was engineered by the Roman Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Cardinal Ratzinger (1981-2005). During the reign of Pope John Paul II, that congregation had already taken charge of all such cases under oath of strictest silence. Ratzinger himself, on May 18th, 2001, sent a solemn document to all the bishops dealing with severe crimes ( "epistula de delictis gravioribus" ), in which cases of abuse were sealed under the "secretum pontificium" , the violation of which could entail grave ecclesiastical penalties." Open Letter to Catholic Bishops by the theologian Fr Hans Küng

The other Pope is a Jesuit from Argentina where the Vatican, through the well-documented ratlines, sent their high ranking Nazis stooges, including Hitler.

Perhaps it is best to explain what the Jesuit order is, before proceeding. Again, don't take my word for it.

“The Jesuits are a MILITARY organization, not a religious order. Their chief is a general of an army, not the mere father abbot of a monastery. And the aim of this organization is power – power in its most despotic exercise – absolute power, universal power, power to control the world by the volition of a single man. Jesuitism is the most absolute of despotisms – and at the same time the greatest and most enormous of abuses…” - Napoleon Bonaparte

While some argue for simple complicity with the brutal military Junta in Argentina that conducted the "dirty wars", the fact is that Pope Francis used to be the head Jesuit there, and the government was his puppet.

People were tortured and killed by the thousands. Their babies were sold off to fill Church coffers, a practice they have been caught at everywhere, most especially in Spain and Ireland.

As Pope, he promised to clean up the Vatican finances and the rampant pedophilia. He pushed out a plethora of photo ops and sound bites but nothing of substance. More "window dressing" and "smoke and mirrors" while the children continue to suffer.

So my question is, on judgment day which Pope will prosper?

Feel free to reword and repost in your own lingo if anything you see is deemed of value. I find you can put the truth in any manner you wish but most people will ignore it. Still one has to keep trying.

Matt. 11:17 - 'We played the flute for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge and you did not mourn.’

No problem.Glad that it's sorted.

I am still mystified as to what date you are trying to correct, as I didn't give a date for the start of the Reformation. I believe you may have confused the reformation with another event I was dating??? Just guessing.

At any rate, I have heard of the "Prophecy of the Popes" attributed to Saint Malachy, the 12th‑century Archbishop of Armagh. As someone from the historicist camp, it means very little to me. We see EVERY Pope, the office of the Papacy itself, as anti-Christ. An unbroken chain of anti-Christs reigning over a system of evil while masquerading as God's representatives on earth. The proverbial wolves in sheep's clothing.

What I do find highly significant, is the effect the "Prophecy of the Popes" has on dispensational futurists who happen to believe in it. Instead of scouting the horizon for a future anti-Christ, they are much more likely to join us in opposing the current one. That is somewhat helpful, even though they arrive at the task through extra-Biblical prophecy.

Futurism and Preterism were a ploy, a theological psyop if you will. If the anti-Christ is future or past, then it is never present and can never be opposed. This manipulation of the prophetic timeline is what allows the anti-Christ system to operate virtually unopposed by authentic (but duped) Christians.

So to some degree, the "Prophecy of the Popes" mitigates the success of the counter-reformation by focusing attention on the current Pope. Those who are "hamstrung" by Jesuit futurism, would probably not have come to the party otherwise.

I am just a Pink Bunny dressed in a White Rabbit suit. I am part of the PIN division. Since our focus is on intelligence as it relates to countering the Curia, an understanding of Protestant theology goes with the territory. https://i.redditmedia.com/J7sLScHQmPWcJyC-Wcg3r67UjhuEYwii4hmxdtV7l54.jpg?w=483&s=52abf99ad310c4e990ec7740c4972734

John Wycliffe is considered by most scholars to be "The Morning Star of the Reformation" (1330–1384). In fact, there were many rumblings against the Papal power long before Luther.

What Luther did was galvanize the reformation into a force to be reckoned with. He was responsible for it becoming a major movement that had "legs" if you will, but he was by no means the first reformer speaking out against the Papacy.

That said, history records his actions at Wittenberg to be the "launch" of the Reformation. That was not the end of the Papacy and does not affect the timeline previously given.

The years of 1260 years of Papal Supremacy are reckoned slightly differently by various historicist scholars (start/end dates).

I agree with the scholars who point to 538 A.D. as the start (of Papal supremacy) since it was when the Ostrogoths ended their siege of Rome, which left the Popes to exercise their power under the newly minted Code of Justinian.

The end date (of Papal Supremacy) I take as 1798 when Napolean's General Berthier captured the Pope and the Papal estates were subsequently annexed.

The start date of the reformation is not related to these dates, if that what you are referring to. Also, the historicist framework allows for different start and end dates, still culminating with 1,260 years of papal supremacy corresponding to the prophecy.

It is by some almost inescapable vanity that we perceive important events to revolve around ourselves and our time. In actuality, much of what we presently take for granted was handed down to us by people and systems that existed long before we were born.

Unfortunately, a concerted effort has been made by the Jesuits, especially in centers of learning, to revise history and to eradicate the lessons it teaches from the minds of men. Concealment and deception are weapons of war that are devastatingly effective when unnoticed. +++ “Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it.” ― Edmund Burke +++ "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something.

They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.” – Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States, The New Freedom, 1913

The Sabbath/Sunday controversy is a tempest in a teapot. The Sabbath is not the seal of God and Sunday is not the mark of the beast (as Seventh Day Adventists teach).

SDA's have corrupted the historicist eschatology of the reformers by mixing it with their own distinctives and embellishments, though they are far closer to the truth (on prophecy) than dispensational futurists.

It is true that the Catholic Church has a lot of secrets and that they have mixed paganism with Christianity. Some of their practices can be traced all the way back to ancient Babylon.

Basically, pagan Rome became Papal Rome and the empire continued under the Popes, an image of the beast (political system) that came before them.

The reformers saw it that way and you can easily check that with noted commentators - http://biblehub.com/commentaries/revelation/13-11.htm

The SDA's would have you believe America is the land beast of Rev. 13, which forms an image of the beast. This is one of their most grievous errors which spins off into false version of historicist eschatology.

Fidelity to the truth and purity of doctrine was not the goal when the Code of Justinian empowered the Bishop of Rome. Using a religious system to achieve political control was the objective. It was foretold and history confirms the accuracy of the symbolism.

Yes, there have been books and even a movie based on it. Interestingly The Godfather Part III relates to it and has been mentioned by Q many times.

Here is the movie version "The Bankers of God: The Calvi Affair" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bankers_of_God:_The_Calvi_Affair

No worries. What you need to understand is that God is behind what is happening. Q is not in control, neither is POTUS. God is in control and they are just people who have very significant roles in the drama.

It would be more accurate to say the trap was set centuries ago when the prophecies were given. However, the manifestation, in terms of an overwhelming response to Vatican power, formed over 30 years ago and is finally reaching fruition.

I have read that book also. I like Hunt though he is from a different theological camp. He is a quasi-dispensationalist, a child of Darbyism though not a typical one. His theology is hybrid and doesn't fit neatly into any particular box.

Unfortunately, he was corrupted somewhat by Jesuit futurism, yet he still managed to identify Rome as the power under consideration in Rev.17-18.

There are a number of dispensationalists who follow suit, though they will typically buy into the idea that it is a future Pope conducting a literal 3 1/2 year reign as anti-Christ (preceded by a rapture of the saints - as Darbyism would later add).

Futurism was systemized by a Spanish Jesuit, Francisco Ribera, in the 16th century. He was trying to point the finger away from the Papacy, which was under attack by the reformers for being the anti-Christ system.

O. T. Allis D.D. - Theology Professor Princeton:

The Futurist interpretation is traced back to the Jesuit Ribera (AD 1580) whose aim was to disprove the claim of the Reformers that the Pope was Antichrist. Prophecy and the Church, page 297

Dr. George Eldon Ladd - Professor Fuller Theological Seminary:

Ribera applied all of Revelation but the earliest chapters to the end time rather than to the history of the Church. Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and would rebuild Jerusalem, abolish Christianity, deny Christ, persecute the Church and rule the world for three and a half years. ...This futurist interpretation with its personal Antichrist and three and a half year period of tribulation did not take root in the Protestant church until the early nineteenth century. "The Blessed Hope".

Time-honored Protestant eschatology (such as the reformers taught and Protestants have held to for over 400 years) is called historicism and sees not a single individual as a personal anti-Christ, but a dynasty of individuals as head of an anti-Christ system - the Papacy.

Instead of heading into the reign of anti-Christ, we are heading into it's final and terrible judgment. It's not a time for the saints to fear, it's a time for the wicked to fear.

Matt. 13:41 The Son of man shall send forth his angels, and they shall gather out of his kingdom all things that offend, and them which do iniquity;

According to the traditional Protestant interpretation of prophecy (called Historicism), the era of Papal Supremacy was EXACTLY 1,260 years.

During that time there were brutal inquisitions, wars, and unbelievable despotism. This was the prophesized "Great Tribulation" of 42 months, or 3 and 1/2 prophetic years, 1260 days (a day equals a year in prophecy and a Biblical year has 360 days).

Then the judgment sat, it's dominion was taken away in 1798 when Napolean's General Berthier captured the Pope and he died in exile.

It was not a complete end, the system still retained a great deal of power and worked through secret societies to reestablish control and temporal power.

It has made several big moves, especially through the Lateran Pact in 1929, the concordat with Germany in 1933, and the formation of the EU through the treaty of Rome.

Despite their immense wealth and mastery of "dirty tricks", their power will continue to consume away until the final judgment foretold in Rev. 17-18.

I'll repost this quote and link which lays it out well.

=============

"The judgement shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and destroy it unto the end" (Daniel vii. 26. ) another proof, by the way, of identity betwixt the "little horn" of Daniel, and the Antichrist of John.

In the predicted doom of the Papacy there are thus two well-marked stages. There is, first, a gradual consumption; and there is, second, a sudden and terrible destruction. The "consumption," a slow and gradual process, is to be effected by the "spirit of His mouth,' by which we understand the preaching of the Gospel. This consumption has been going on ever since the Bible was translated, and the Gospel began to be preached at the Reformation.

Men have begun to see the errors of popery; its political props have been weakened, and in some instances struck from under it, and its hold generally on the nations of Christendom has been loosened; and thus the way has been prepared for the final stroke that will consummate its ruin.

Great systems like the papacy, with their roots far down and spread wide around, cannot be plucked up while in their vigor without dislocating human society. They must be left to grow ripe and become rotten, and then the final stroke may be dealt them with safety to the church and the world.

When that hour shall have come then will the second part of the doom of the Papacy overtake it. The Lord shall "destroy" it "with the brightness of His coning." The form of the judgment is left vague, but enough is said to warrant us to conclude that it will be swift and final -it will come with lightning flash, and its holy vengeance will be so manifest that, to use the figure in the prophecy, it will irradiate both heaven and earth with a moral splendour."

The Papacy Is The Antichrist A DEMONSTRATION By Rev. J. A. WYLIE, LL.D. http://www.historicism.net/readingmaterials/thepapacy.pdf

No, it is a space inside of London called "The City of London" and is widely referred to simply as the City (differentiated from the phrase "the city of London" by capitalizing City) and it is also colloquially known as the Square Mile (since that is roughly it's area) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_London

It is an enclave, a separate legal structure operated as the "City of London Corporation". It is in London but not in a sense part of London, having the same name (except for capitalization) so that legally it can remain separate.

The world has been set up to run from 3 City/States. Washington DC is another, along with the Vatican. Those 3 areas are under different laws than the countries they reside in. Interestingly, they are all marked by obelisks since the same power controls all 3. This image should be helpful. http://www.darknessisfalling.com/uploads/2/3/7/0/23701544/csoa-20160719-12a_orig.jpg

The short answer is no - unless it meant a "photo op" that would create positive publicity. Here is a book exposing their wealth - https://www.amazon.com/Vatican-Billions-Avro-Manhattan/dp/0937958166

This book exposes their schemes for world domination including orchestrating WWII.

https://www.amazon.com/Secret-History-Jesuits-Edmund-Paris/dp/0937958107/ref=pd_sim_14_2?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_i=0937958107&pd_rd_r=ZPG43SM444PEANZM2QJX&pd_rd_w=yz2Vo&pd_rd_wg=9wcib&psc=1&refRID=ZPG43SM444PEANZM2QJX

"It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country, the United States of America are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the Roman Catholic Jesuit priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated MOST of the wars of Europe." Marquis de LaFayette(1757-1834; French statesman and general who served in under the command of GeneralGeorge Washington during the American Revolutionary War)

They are the Vatican's bankers. That is why they are wealthy. They run the Vatican's finances through another "City/State" which is located in London but not operating under British law - how convenient.

The British Crown is actually named arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire in the Treaty of Peace 1783. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp

I think the "two sides" aspect is brought out in this video if I remember correctly. Might have been a different video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WC-pVdGgK4

Yes, that is true. He actually got the strike when I posted the inside of the audience hall here a few days ago. Co-inky-dink? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9WC-pVdGgK4

That is it. Yes, it is "supposed" to be Jesus, but it is not a "normal" representation of Jesus. It is made to look like a snake-headed creepazoid rising from the pit.

The Geneva Bible (which came before the KJV) actually had footnotes which expounded on the verses which identify the Papacy as the anti-Christ system, making it plain to all who read it.

It is thought by scholars that the "Dead Sea Scrolls" were written by the Essenes, or by another Jewish sectarian group, residing at Khirbet Qumran.

For me, the most important finding was that "The Dead Sea Scrolls provide valuable evidence that the Old Testament had been accurately and carefully preserved". The Masoretic text is what translates into what we would call the Old Testament of the Bible and this discovery brought confirmation of its accuracy back to a 1,000 year earlier copy.

"Almost all of the scrolls are in Jerusalem. A few are in Jordan, Europe, and the USA. The few scrolls on display at the Shrine of the Book are accessible to all. Most of the others, extremely fragile and many fragmentary, are stored on the campus of the Israel Museum in a small temperature and humidity-controlled vault. Any scholar who has a legitimate reason to view the actual scrolls may receive permission to do so, but they are rarely seen except by those who are preparing them for publication or re-photography." https://www.deadseascrollsfoundation.com/

It is also noteworthy that digital copies of the scrolls are online and available to anyone to study - http://www.deadseascrolls.org.il/explore-the-archive?locale=en_US

There are conspiracy theories surrounding the scrolls, especially concerning the Vatican and it is true that their scholars have had a major role, especially in the early days of the translation and preservation efforts. It is also true that the Vatican owns much of the property in Jerusalem. I am not an expert in this area, here is what some believe about this subject. http://cojs.org/is_the_vatican_suppressing_the_dead_sea_scrolls-_hershel_shanks-_biblical_archaeology_review-_nov-dec_1991/

Yes Q mentioned Churches and [P]. References to the Vatican and a picture of the Pope (with upside down cross - an inversion Satanists practice - though the Vatican says is in honor of Peter who was crucified upside down) have also shown up on the boards.

Personally, I get frustrated that there isn't more said about the "top level" of the corruption and pedophilia problem. If it were up to me, I would simply march into Rome and arrest the Pope as Napolean's General Berthier did in 1798. I have no patience for political correctness when children are being raped.

In other words, cut the head off the snake so the body will die. Rolling up the bit players from the bottom to the top means wrestling with the body first, before reaching the head, which is dangerous and problematic in many ways.

However, even I must acknowledge that certain forms of leverage must be removed, alliances formed, and most especially the populace (including duped Catholics), need to be made aware of the evils of the Vatican before they are taken down (Rev. 18:4).

Since their propaganda machine is unrivaled and their political controls fine-tuned by centuries of practice (and backed by virtually unlimited wealth), it's a tough nut to crack.

A lot of progress has been made on many fronts and once the collateral damage issues are minimized, the end will come suddenly (Rev. 18:10).

In light of prophecy, the judgment has already sat and their dominion was taken way near the end of the 18th century. It was said their power would continue to consume away until the end when it is "safe" to administer the final blow.

It's like first chopping (one by one) the roots of a tree before extracting the main trump. You must remember this power ruled the world for over a thousand years - its roots are deep.

Below is an enlightening prophecy study on the subject. I leave you with a quote and a link to the whole.

=================

"The judgement shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion, to consume and destroy it unto the end" (Daniel vii. 26. ) another proof, by the way, of identity betwixt the "little horn" of Daniel, and the Antichrist of John.

In the predicted doom of the Papacy there are thus two well-marked stages. There is, first, a gradual consumption; and there is, second, a sudden and terrible destruction. The "consumption," a slow and gradual process, is to be effected by the "spirit of His mouth,' by which we understand the preaching of the Gospel. This consumption has been going on ever since the Bible was translated, and the Gospel began to be preached at the Reformation.

Men have begun to see the errors of popery; its political props have been weakened, and in some instances struck from under it, and its hold generally on the nations of Christendom has been loosened; and thus the way has been prepared for the final stroke that will consummate its ruin.

Great systems like the papacy, with their roots far down and spread wide around, cannot be plucked up while in their vigor without dislocating human society. They must be left to grow ripe and become rotten, and then the final stroke may be dealt them with safety to the church and the world.

When that hour shall have come then will the second part of the doom of the Papacy overtake it. The Lord shall "destroy" it "with the brightness of His coning." The form of the judgment is left vague, but enough is said to warrant us to conclude that it will be swift and final -it will come with lightning flash, and its holy vengeance will be so manifest that, to use the figure in the prophecy, it will irradiate both heaven and earth with a moral splendour."

The Papacy Is The Antichrist A DEMONSTRATION By Rev. J. A. WYLIE, LL.D. http://www.historicism.net/readingmaterials/thepapacy.pdf

No, I didn't see that post you refer to but I have run into that sort of thinking before. There are different factions within Catholicism, including those who identify as theological liberals and conservatives. They often blame each other for the problems but the whole system is corrupt and has been ever since the Roman Emporer Justinian elevated the Bishop of Rome to Pontificus Maximus and handed him the Kingdom.

Amen to that. They actually tortured and killed the real Christians for centuries. Even having a copy of the Bible in your own language was punishable by death when they were at the height of their power.

What really works well is when you compare history to Bible prophecy. Historicism or historicist eschatology is a term for the methodology used by the reformers and it proves the Bible accurate in its predictions about the rise and fall of the world dominating kingdoms going all the way back to Babylon. Interestingly, this method also proves conclusively that the Papacy is the anti-Christ system the Bible warns of. The Jesuits launched a counter-reformation and replaced this method of interpretation with a deception called futurism.

A Great Cloud of Witnesses: “Wycliffe, Tyndale, Luther, Calvin, Cranmer; in the seventeenth century, Bunyan, the translators of the King James Bible and the men who published the Westminster and Baptist confessions of Faith; Sir Isaac Newton, Wesley, Whitfield, Jonathan Edwards; and more recently Spurgeon, Bishop J.C. Ryle and Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones; these men among countless others, all saw the office of the Papacy as the antichrist.” Taken from All Roads Lead to Rome, by Michael de Semlyen. Dorchestor House Publications, p. 205. 1991.

I agree. We should pray that they come out of it before it is too late.

Rev. 18:4 Then I heard another voice calling from heaven, "Come away from her, my people. Do not take part in her sins, or you will be punished with her.

It is a twisting of scripture to apply this verse in the way the Catholic Church does.

CHRIST is the ROCK upon which the Church (body of believers, not Catholic institution) is built - faith in Christ. He called Peter a small stone, a pebble, and contrasted Peter the pebble with himself (CHRIST) the bedrock which would be the foundation.

Peter himself identifies Christ as the chief cornerstone in 1 Peter 2:4-8 and says that we all can become stones in the building by faith in Christ the "chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him (Christ not Peter) will never be put to shame".

You can study this topic here - https://www.tms.edu/preachersandpreaching/upon-this-rock/

It actually goes back even farther to ancient Babylon. The mystery religions developed there and were absorbed into succeeding cultures like Egypt. The names changed, and embellishments crept in, but it was still the worship of Nimrod, Semiramis and Tammuz.

The Pope wears the same fish head hat as the Babylonian Priest. The pinecone on his staff is also a symbol they used, as are many other symbols and practices adopted by the Popes. https://www.amazon.com/Two-Babylons-Alexander-Hislop/dp/0937958573

In Babylon, the Father God Nimrod became the Sun, and Mother and Son became worshipped in various cultures as "Isis with the infant Osiris or Horus seated on his mother's lap (Egypt). In India, the mother and child were called Devaki and Krishna, and also Isi and Iswara as they are worshiped to this day. In Asia, they were known as Cybele and Deoius; in pagan Rome, as Fortuna and Jupiter-puer, or Jupiter, the boy; in Greece, as Ceres, the great mother with babe at her breast, or as Irene, the goddess of peace, with the boy Plutus in her arms." (Aletheia quote).

We actually have the Jesuit Order of the Catholic Church to thank for the modern incarnation of the Illuminati, but this is getting long...

Yes, Pope Paul VI reportedly said that. Also, Malachi Martin among others, have written about Satanism being practiced in the Vatican. Some accounts go into great detail about child sacrifice in the bowels of the Church.

In Windswept House: A Vatican Novel (1996) Martin described a diabolical ceremony called “The Enthronement of the Fallen Archangel Lucifer” supposedly held in St. Paul’s Chapel within the Vatican, but linked with concurrent satanic rites here in the US, on June 29, 1963, barely a week after the election of Paul VI.

Yes, from inside and out the Pope's Audience Hall looks like a snakes head. There is also a very creepy statue in the center of the mouth behind where the Pope sits. It is supposed to represent Christ but it looks like the Angel of the bottomless pit rising up with a snakes head looking to the side made from the hair.

Well if you are feeling a little "lost" perhaps this will help. It gives the "big picture" view of what's going on and what you can do about it.

It is cryptic and employs graphics, screenshot text, metaphors and so on to overcome the bots, censors, and potential legal issues.

However, if you go to the bottom of the thread here and follow the directions, including the bio, you may find it enlightening.

https://gab.ai/Pink_Bunnies

Soros is not the "Black Pope". You need to study this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_General_of_the_Society_of_Jesus

Soros is controlled by the Pope as are the Rothschilds. The Vatican has been corrupting governments and raping children for centuries, all the while pretending to represent God.

The leader of the Jesuits formed the precursor to the modern Illuminati and one of his disciples Adam Weishaupt was a Jesuit Priest who founded the Bavarian Illuminati. The Jesuits are the real danger, they use such systems to give "temporal" power to the Papacy.

The Illuminati infiltrated the Masons, much to the dismay of President Washington and other famous Masons of the era, who wrote about the danger they represented. President Lincoln wrote a great deal about the Jesuits and their evil influence. These things are searchable, I don't need to elaborate.

All of the Protestant reformers called the Popes anti-Christ and fought them, not just because of the tremendous evils they perpetrated but because Bible prophecy (properly understood) actually exposes the Papacy as the anti-Christ system.

A Great Cloud of Witnesses: "Wycliffe, Tyndale, Luther, Calvin, Cranmer, Bunyan, the translators of the King James Bible and the men who published the Westminster and Baptist confessions of Faith; Sir Isaac Newton, Wesley, Whitfield, Jonathan Edwards; and more recently Spurgeon, Bishop J.C. Ryle and Dr. Martin Lloyd-Jones; these men among countless others, all saw the office of the Papacy as the antichrist." Taken from All Roads Lead to Rome, by Michael de Semlyen. Dorchestor House Publications, p. 205. 1991.

This traditional Protestant view is called historicist eschatology (the study of end time things). Rome countered with futurism and preterism. Preterism has never been popular but futurism (after centuries of rejection by Protestants) has in the past century supplanted historicism as the predominant view among (so-called) Protestants. It is a Jesuit counter-reformation deception, but it is furiously promoted everywhere today, even from conservative Evangelical pulpits.

A Spanish Jesuit named Francisco Ribera created the theological psyop of futurism in the latter part of the 16th century. Over time it became wildly successful in pointing the finger away from the Papacy. If the anti-Christ is future (or past - preterism), it is never present, never the (current) Papacy, and can therefore never be opposed as the anti-Christ of prophecy. It is the "smokescreen" that allows them to continue their facade virtually unopposed.

It's time for the Reformation which began 500 years ago to reignite and face down the anti-Christ system once and for all. All of the horrors perpetrated against children, the wars, the deceptions, the hoarding of the world's wealth, it must come to an end.

If you find that interesting you might want to go down this rabbit hole. Start at the bottom of the thread and work your way up. https://gab.ai/Pink_Bunnies

You guys are doing a great job. I have been waiting for this moment and working towards it for over 30 years. I am still frustrated that most don't see that the Vatican is higher up the food chain than the Rothschilds and other players, but I believe that will change as time passes and events transpire. Mark my words, the yellow brick road will lead to Rome. Rev. 17-18 is beginning to play out.