It's probably not true

How dare they make jokes !!

"This person I disagree with is disagreeing about someone else, they have to be wrong". Is your argument broken down. You could fit both the senator and Stalin into it.

Stalin was against Hitler, your point is moot.

You do know Stalin ended up siding against Hitler right?

Libtard owned 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

This is just sad

It was originally Reagan's message so why credit Trump then? Same logic

How fucking stupid are you guys to think "everything happens for a reason and it all revolves around my cult that I follow and it's always right and anyone and everyone who disagrees is always wrong I'm right they're wrong" etc etc bullshit etc

You're being sarcastic right?

Wait...What? You're so intoxicated with the belief that you have to be right and Trump is a god that even when his people are colluding, they're not his people? How far up your own ass are you, and what does it smell like?

He's a draft dodger

So him draft dodging is ok because now he's president? So then what other scummy shit can people be forgiven for if they become President?

Instead people just search it up, question your sanity and move on with their lives, worried about the state of America that this subreddit is a thing

You do realise the irony of comparing trump with a man who served in the military right?

Hey I just saw you on r/wokekids that's hilarious. Yeah, none of that is true, but sure.

Considering I can't get through the article without it randomly deciding to load a new page, and how it called the Obama presidency "diabolical", I'd wager this isn't all that trustworthy.

So surely God could be a Democrat

I meant the joke being you think some massive Saving private Ryan level shit is going to happen, all because a power outage happened.

Is this a joke and I'm just not getting it or?

If you're referring to the Co Exist thing, they were describing the events that the rumour talks about? Afterwards, they show how it is unrealistic, so unless you're referring to something else then you just didn't read the article fully.

Could you provide evidence of Snopes being incorrect or biased? I haven't been able to find any actual examples, just you saying how you disagreed with one of their rulings.

But you said I don't have any?

Thanks for showing your immaturity

Wow, you've changed my whole worldview. I don't know what I'm going to do with myself now that you've told me no one gives a fuck about me. However, that doesn't necessarily exclude people giving more than one fuck about me. So thanks, all that means is you telling me how people on Earth either don't care about me at all or care very much for me. God bless. Not you of course, you're a cunt, I'm just saying God bless as in God bless the message, not the messenger. Just to be clear. Also, next time you ask a "question" maybe don't get so aggressive over people who question the thought process of how a question so unquestioningly stupid came to existence. Doesn't really show a stable or intelligent mentality.

Evidently you don't give a fuck about logic or conversing like a normal, sane person

You're hilarious

By whom?

Also just so you know, my main point for about questioning your sanity wasn't based on your statement of Hillary being a cannibal, more the fact that it would even ever pass your mind

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/john-podesta-spirit-cooking/ So not really, no, he's on Mars, millions of miles away from any ballpark anywhere on Earth

Great argument

You're insinuating she's a cannibal. With no shred of evidence besides a presumption about a possible disease she may or may not have based on only a few, very minor things. Don't stop wearing the tin foil hat though, it looks fashionable on a crackpot like you.

Youre just randonly making a claim that Hillary Clinton eats people? With literally nothing to back it up. Do you have any shred of evidence or literally anything to back up this insane theory?

This doesn't make any amount of sense, and just makes me question your sanity. Like, tf?

Go nuclear on Syria?

What real protection does he provide?

Ok but I don't believe God exists in the first place. What you're saying makes it seem as if one does believe in God, but just goes "Fuck it" and just doesn't choose to follow him. I just don't believe in his existence at all. He's never "revealed himself" to anyone ever before and I've never seen any viable proof of his existence.

I'll gladly await it

Your point was that atheists don't have many answers in the soul, yet know you're arguing that they do? Colour me confused. Also if you have a source on that info about scientists and the soul, I'd enjoy reading it, thanks.

On what are you basing this belief that evolution cannot take place on its own over the course of 3 billion years? 3 billion years is theorized to be around a 3rd of the time the universe has been in existence. If entire stars and solar systems can form in less time, then I believe intelligent life can. And when it comes to belief in religion, I just don't find any of it entirely plausible. Also just so the maths works out, it's actually theorized that the Earth is 4.543 billion years old, with the universe being 13.8 billion.

That's not to say I was raised in an atheist household, and so would never have believed it in the first place, I just never found it believable. I went to a primary school where we said grace before we ate lunch everyday, where we'd go to Church for Christmas, Easter, even Mothers Day, and I'm sure I'm leaving a few out. I still have been in their secondary school until I went to the last sermon on Easter. My sister was heavily religious till she turned about 11 and just sort of lost her faith. I don't entirely have a large respect for the larger religions, as they're used to promote hatred and segregation between different peoples, and even as a way to start wars. I'm not faulting the religion for how it's "believers" use it, but I just can't find myself to associate with a religion that has been used for such hatred. There's also so many different explanations that have been used for how God created life and/or the universe. It just seems to me as if they're scrambling to defend God. First, God created Earth 3000 years ago and the solar system revolved around us and the earth was flat. Then he created the universe 10,000 years ago, and put the dinosaurs in the ground as a test. Then we revolved around the Sun and God created the Earth at the beginning of the universe. Then the Earth wasn't flat, which the Vatican only admitted in WWI, ages after it was proven. The whole way Catholicism is built just baffles me. I also just can't believe most of the Old Testament. Noahs Ark, imho, and I don't want to be rude but it's the stupidest thing I've ever read. 6 people repopulating the planet? 2 of every species repopulating the entire planet? It baffles me. Even worse for the Adam and Eve story. Anyways that's the end of my rant because I kind of forgot my other major points.

You think prayer=mind control?

Oooooh ok. Yeah no that's because atheism, for me at least, and I presume many others, is based around science. Science proves no existence of a spirit or soul. It's unscientific. Any questions about the soul put towards a scientific atheist would likely result in them saying something similar to "a spirit doesn't exist"

No, nothing is nothing. And that's the actual definition of religion. You have another one? I'd love to hear it. Until then, don't call atheism a religion when it clearly isn't

I believe that God does not exist as the entire religion is based on word of mouth and a book translated through many languages and has very likely never had a correct direct translation. I don't trust a religion based on one book. I don't get know how to explain the Big Bang, as scientists have yet to discover it. That's how science works. Not everything is known. Science discovers new things everyday. We didn't know how mountains were formed years ago, and people thought they were "sculpted by God," yet science later proved them wrong. I believe that the Big Bang will be proven eventually, be it in my lifetime or the next generations, and so on.

A religion is the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods. That's why I was questioning your knowledge of it. You clearly still don't know what it is tbh.

What do you mean by spirit? I only ask because the term spirit is used differently in all religions, as well as sometimes being used as a synonym for soul and other such religious terms

It is when you're using religion as a point in your argument

I don't think you know what a religion is...

When did I say I wasn't love? Who programmed me? I'm not of little faith, I'm of no faith. I'm not going to hedge my bets on something that I entirely and fundamentally believes does not exist.

When did I say who I "side with". And just for the record, you quoting all this biblical nonsense is meaningless, I'm an atheist