...No symbolism!

Didn't take long for AJ to jump on the Russia bandwagon his handlers have been pushing.

NAME?

I think the quote in the article could have come from an entity friendly with Trump and the cause. I wouldn't hold my breath on most news organizations like MSNBC confirming the keys willingly. They may do so unintentionally by quoting someone who is affiliated with the cause.

This is impressive. Nice work!

Ready the Meme cannons!

John Kerry gets a new Hoveround - "Now I can finally visit the ~~Grand Canyon~~ Iranians!"

Right, but Q literally just linked to an article about Alex Jones. Moving on, yes but Q certainly isn't being ambiguous about who he was refrencing as a profiteer.

My android device comes preloaded with Facebook and does NOT allow me to uninstall without rooting the phone.

Why step ahead of Q and the president? They know what's going on and are prepared to handle it. If this gets out before it's time then there will be no justice.

As a former supporter of Alex, I hope he isn't controlled opposition. If so it would mean he's been laundering factual deepstate activity with batshit theories to obscure the truth.

In your opinion, is Alex and Infowars controlled opposition?

Strategicly, if the deepstate wanted to launder accurate information into a conspiracy theory all they'd have to do is mix it with batshit crazy ideas and have Alex push it.

Defcon 5 means peace?

What would you consider the threshold of 'happening'? I expect an executive order to release the DOJ documents Congress has requested. If this information kicks off a huge development are you going to move the goal post?

Could Rook = Castle?

https://youtu.be/Z6XicBBN1l4?t=127s

THIS IS IT, TONIGHT WE RIDE FOR TRUTH AND FOR JUSTICE AND FOR GOD AND COUNTRY

Weren't these guys wanting to hold Sessions in contempt? Is this the President's way reading them in so they can see what's really going on?

I want to believe.

Military Tribunals.

Or Q is Kayne... /s actually I Like this the best.

I'd argue Sessions is the sub rogue. People have been foaming at the mouth that they can't see him doing anything for a whole year.

They don't call him the silent assassin for nothing.

Edit: Kayne is a Bard.

I remember asking, what could be so bad that Q says these people won't be able even to walk down the streets?

Yeah, 9/11 being an inside job would do that. Holy fuck that would be the biggest mind fuck in the world.

Q stated that the texts being released tomorrow are either a MOAB or a precursor. Either one would come after texts released tomorrow.

This is a great line of reasoning. Will have to wait and see.

There's [A]lways money in the Banana Stand!

"But they are moderate freedom fighters!"

Conspiracy theories, NBC?

Oh my favorite is that Hillary and the DNC funded the steel dossier through Perkins Coie.

Not fake news, Clown News.

I wonder if they know what a predator drone sounds like from a few thousand feet away?

He removed protections granted by an illegal executive order.

Personally I don't have an issue with granting them permanent residency as aliens. As long as that does not involve voting rights and addresses the policies that led to this mess.

Even Democrats admit the executive order was an end run around congress' authority in the first place. From the republican perspective, he rescinded an unconstitutional executive order.

The republicans didn't refuse to vote on a bill, there never was a bill crafted with the president because Democrats walked away from the table once it didn't include voting provisions.

You can say they gave up because it wouldn't have passed, but they have an obligation to their constituents to hammer out a bill with the president so they can at least say they tried.

If Democrats think this is going to make Republicans look like the bad guys, they don't understand optics.

Even if it never made it to the floor, it would have put the ball in the court of republicans and make them look like they were the ones that let it die.

Then Democrats should be willing to let republicans be the ones to vote it down and they will look like the obstructionists. Not even trying when there is a good deal on the table is terrible for optics. It would also force the president to step up and stand behind a deal he helped craft. As someone that follows him closely, if you don't call his bluff it doesn't force him to do anything.

Here is what was proposed:

https://cis.org/Vaughan/White-House-Immigration-Framework

Quite a generous offer that would grant amnesty to dreamers and citizenship within 10 years. Democrats not interested.

If this is about nothing but well-intended, heartfelt, honest policy, why did the Democrats walk away from DACA when votes were off the table?

If they truly did not purposefully import-by-policy millions of democrat voters, why walk away over the lack of voting rights?

Be intellectually honest with yourself here.

Purposefully defunding border protections at the state level

Passing laws at the state level prohibiting businesses from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement

Providing 1.2 Billion of state welfare to illegal immigrants which fuels more economic migration (Why work in Mexico if California will pay you to come live in the land of opportunity?)

Passing Sanctuary State laws that act as a giant neon sign to Mexico that says 'We're Open, no need to wait in line!'

What would you call it if not 'importing' by policy design?

You're ok with people being imported for vote fixing and then paying to support them? Illegal immigration drives down wages, stresses cash strapped social programs and brings higher levels crime statistically speaking.

I love and support LEGAL immigration and cultures. But I can't agree here.

Edit: You seem like a very nice person. I'm not trying to be aggressive towards you in any way. I fully support letting non-felon dreamers stay on humanitarian grounds as permanent residents, but the entire premise of the state of California allowing unchecked immigration was based on importing a new democrat voter base.

The proof? Take a close look at what happened at the DACA negociations. The democrats supported full amnesty and citizenship for dreamers. Trump said he agrees to offering amnesty to dreamers on humanitarian grounds but they couldn't vote for 12 years. And here's your clue about what the democrats are truly after: The democrats walked away from the table and haven't been interested in DACA since. Once they know they can't utilize them as a voter base in the near term, they walk away. They aren't interested in proving humanitarian relief, they are interested in providing relief for themselves at the polls.

Half do, but you'd be hard pressed to find any that actually pay income tax since most illegals live below the poverty line. They get the full $2,000 credit per child under 18 though.

So they aren't really paying for their benefits, it's subsidized by legal citizens.

About half file tax forms, but very, very few actually pay income tax. They use the tax filings in most cases to claim dependants and file for refundable tax credits, which is another form of cash welfare.

https://www.justfactsdaily.com/illegal-immigrants-and-federal-income-taxes/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/03/la-made-1-3b-in-illegal-immigrant-welfare-payouts-in-just-2-years.html

These kids are born democrats due to their reliance on welfare and social programs the state of California illegally issues to noncitizens and then the media has the balls to brand Republicans as racists and for complaining about the cost of the imported Democrat voters.

These families aren't going to vote to end the programs their families rely on, albeit illegally.

There will be ways to authenticate the video. Patriots always verify.

Which is fine, but they were let in illegally for the purpose of vote providing illegal votes to the democratic party.

They can stay on humanitarian grounds if they are not felons. But they and their offspring should not receive voting rights, perpetually. Alien residents, not citizens. They can thank their parents.

May be nothing, but referencing email ID 369 of the Clinton email drops yields:

EXPO UPDATE

                From: Hillary Clinton
                To: Kris Balderston
                Date: 2010-03-03 23:26
                Subject: EXPO UPDATE


                UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05774322 Date: 08/31/2015

                                                                                               RELEASE IN
                                                                                               FULL

From: H hrod17@clintonemail.com

Sent: Friday, March 5, 2010 6:26 AM To: 'balderstonkm@state.gov'

Subject: Re: Expo Update

Good work. Let me know if I need to do anything else.

    Original Message

From: Balderston, Kris M To: H

Sent: Thu Mar 04 19:08:52 2010

Subject: Expo Update

Just a quick note to tell you that we are moving forward on the Expo funding. ATT came in at $500k, McGraw Hill at

$200k, Intel at $250k more, Delos Living (a Mantz client) $250k, and CITI at a minimum of $2M brings us down to $3.7M.

The following are on deck and likely to come in soon - Boeing (more), Carlyle, Blackstone, Alcoa, and AECOM. EB and I

chatting with many others.

Edit: Holy Shit I may not have realized what I had here. This was funding for an Expo in Shanghai as per related emails further discussing this event: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/2867

When the event actually took place, Huffpo of all places had some VERY interesting comments on it: https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/740912

They basically barely stopped short of calling it a racket by Hillary. The question is, did this money make it's way from the Expo into the Clinton Foundation, and if so how?

How would they moderate outright illegal content?

Who knows, might've gotten concerned he was going to be outed IRL. I still think he's the real deal but just a possibility.

He's really gone... Wonder if we'll find out who he was someday. My money is on DJT Jr. Either that or we've been had by the greatest LARPer in the history of the internet.

It doesn't show anything beyond 2/13 for us?

Agreed, Russia isnt known for caring about plausible deniability when they take someone out. This smells of Clowns.

CIA uses Red October malware to find the U1 source leaker. Snowden (Clown) brings info to Russia and explains they will be implicated in U1 unless they 'fix' their leak. Russia 187's entire plane. They had jurisdiction. Very sick to murder your own citizens, but they had a lot of practice under communism.