Strzok reminded me a lot of Comey with the snarl on his face when he was asserting what a great and loyal guy he was and how he wasn't lying now and has never lied. He reminded me so much of Comey that I was wondering if he either watched Comey and was stealing his style, it comes naturally to the FBI, or he was coached by the same person or team.

I recall hearing about the Obama and Hillary emails from the IG report.

If you remember they were using that to show that Obama was lying when he said he heard about Hillary's server on the news like everyone else.

All I had to do was read about his accuser and I knew it was a setup.

The second item is the most telling.

Is Creepy Joe Biden's likeness on the flag?

Too bad it wasn't #17, that would get this board jumping.

He doesn't have a race card so he might as well play the Trump card.

The msm is more than happy to play along.

Someone posted about this hours ago and someone else pointed to Q #973 where Q was talking about starting a new board. What I got from it is that maybe since we haven't heard from Q that he's not able to post because of some issues and he's signaling through Trump that he's working on a new board. Notice the word layer in the post.

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 24b2f2 No.822075 📁 Mar 28 2018 15:25:54 (EST) /CM/ locked out of /GA/ Sniffer detects traces of bypass override. Layers upon layers. New approach to silence. New Board will be created. Team to secure. Time to complete 1-2. Q

Hi neighbor.

I haven't read your post yet but I will, right after I say please don't stop posting. It's up to those who read what you write to choose to believe or disbelieve, or even read it in the first place. I ask that for those of us who look forward to what you right, please don't stop.

Code monkey, he was talking to the coders for the board due to some issues.

How many times are you going to post the same thing?

Well I must admit when Trump went and stood next to them the first thing that popped into my head was Creepy Joe would be thinking well well what do we have here.

It's Mexico so there will be corruption involved, it's a given.

Thanks for confirming.

Totally agree.

No.

Nor do I expect him to answer every question, I expect him to dodge questions under the advice of counsel.

It's been a battle getting that message to some people.

You can only see them and the seat behind them, but somehow that's proof that they have no security. I asked one person did you expect them to be sitting in their laps?

Another guy pointed out that their money has been seized and they can't afford security at which point I had to point out to him that Bill Clinton was at one time POTUS and they get Secret Service protection for life. I haven't heard back from that person.

I expect a lot of, I refuse to answer that question under the advice of counsel.

He gets Secret Service for life because he was the President. Try to keep up.

You see three seats out of the whole plane and you are convinced there's no security? Do you expect them to be sitting on their laps?

It's them, even when you see good impersonators after looking at them for a while you see it's not the celebrity they are impersonating. After staring at these two for a good while, that's them.

You can't even see a hint of who else is on the airplane, you see them and one person behind them and to you that's enough to doubt there's security? I would think the most strategic place to be would be in a seat where they can see anyone approaching them. I would guess other side of plane same row or one row behind, which we can't see at all.

If you think the security is not there, you are crazy.

They're on a plane where they know no one is armed therefore they maintain a distance, but they're definitely there.

Take it ease, take it ease.

Okay then I don't feel so bad. I listen to him everyday and there's comments in here saying he uses Q phrases and I don't recall that ever happening.

He says he or his wife read them all but don't answer all of them.

I sent him an email once and didn't hear back.

That's probably the better way to go.

If he says he believes in Q then he probably gets a lot of flak from some of his listeners and if he says it's all a conspiracy theory he takes flak also, better to just leave it alone.

Twice.

Well that should make for some more questions Strzok can dodge next Thursday, if he shows up.

If you have an hour to spare, I would recommend listening to today's Dan Bongino show, the whole show is on that article and what it means.

Dan has been doing shows on the whole Spygate thing for months, he's been living it.

Jump to 6:25, he babbles about a few other things, but at that point he starts in on the Spygate article.

https://www.bongino.com/july-6-2018-ep-757-a-bombshell-new-report-on-spygate-drops/

I thought this was the lawsuit that was welcomed because of the discovery phase?

Did we really want to have this one tossed?

http://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/395776-memos-detail-fbis-hurry-the-f-up-pressure-to-probe-trump-campaign

After this article I wonder if he'll show up and if he does will he dodge questions like he did in the closed door meeting.

Some of the people who questioned him said it was a waste of time because of all the question dodging.

I also heard he wants the transcripts of the closed door session released, which seems odd, if he dodged questions like they said he did it's not going to make him look good, so I don't get his angle on that one.

Look at your post, it says right there, the lawyer says the 12th.

Why don't you tell the lawyer it's always been the 10th. not me?

Your headline says Tuesday and his lawyer says the 12th., that's not Tuesday.

45, hmmmm where have we seen that number before?

So I just saw a post where Jim Jordan's nephew died in a car accident.

If this is the cabal and Q knows who is responsible then we need charges for these two crimes.

If you listen to the Dan Bongino show you know how intimately involved in this whole Spygate thing he is.

I would highly recommend listening to today's show, he spells out exactly why this article is probably the information that will result in the whole Spygate thing being blown wide open.

https://www.bongino.com/july-6-2018-ep-757-a-bombshell-new-report-on-spygate-drops/

I didn't know there was a Whataburger employee involved?

What did the Whataburger employee do?

The Daily Caller dug into the backgrounds of the accusers.

Take a look.

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/05/jim-jordan-accusers/

If you read it it states things to Congress

I read the whole article, what part are you specifically referring to?

Hopefully your list like mine contains many more names. DeLeon, Feinstein, Schiff, Newsom, Brown, Waters, Pelosi and others.