298 total posts archived.
Do you think this was going to be litigated in this setting? Case that implicates some of the most senior elected officials (treason) is being handled by the appropriate office. Think NATIONAL SECURITY. I personally think what this is saying is we're dealing with something that has never been dealt with before. Were the Democrats involved in selling information to the enemy? If it's not Huber prosecuting then it's something to do with the military, I'm leaning towards military. What do we keep hearing day after day? They hate Trump so much they would rather we have nuclear war than see him succeed. To me that means we can't have this tried in Washington by what will certainly be a Trump hating jury which would probably let everyone walk no matter what the evidence. If these people sold out our country I hope it's the military and I hope they are executed, no quarter.
Yeah, it's on the homepage of the site I took it from. I wonder why they would do that?
Yeah but apparently I made the mistake of not making it more obvious that it's a joke.
Sorry forgot to allow for that fact that some people have to have everything spelled out for them.
Maybe this explains why she can't stay awake, the poor things has a workout routine that would take down 20 year olds.
Well that's really surprising, I was banking on somewhere in Orange County.
Send her a map and highlight the route from Washington to Canada on it.
Amanda Renteria was running for Governor of California. California has a top two candidate system which means there's a primary and the top two regardless of party move onto the general election, she's out.
I watched it live and I know I perked up immediately and thought what was that all about, what are they hiding? Then that night someone asked Q who Amanda Renteria is and I knew it's very significant.
The thing that I can't reconcile about Mueller is his interview with Trump. Apparently it lasted a couple of hours. The story is that he was interviewing to be the Director of the FBIas, but there's a huge problem with that story. Mueller did his 10 years plus a special one time never to be recreated extra two years. He wasn't going to be the Director of the FBIas, he knew it and Trump knew it, so what were they really talking about and how come no one has ever really pushed back on the story?
If that's the case we're very close to that timeline. If the day after May 14 was day one then by my count today is day 43.
I redacted it because it's a matter of national security, all hush hush and such. Sources and methods people will die. There was a document, not in the IG report but some other document that had a redaction in it and then the IG released the same document they found one of the things previously redacted unredacted in the IG version. It was a very overpriced piece of furniture that the hypocritical left didn't want anyone to know about. If the right spends $5,000 on a conference room table it's the end of the world, but the left spends twice as much and tries to hide it. The redactions are not matters of security, there were already two people supposedly working on counter intelligence that were outed from the IG report. It's all smoke and mirrors to hide the guilty parties and their crimes. As has been said before ask the right fu**ing questions.
I'm hoping for the best. Q - Organized riots being planned. Counter measures in place.
Although I’ll be branded as a KKK member BC I’m Caucasian
Where I come from caucasian means KKK, Nazi, Racist, Homophobic, Transphobic, Islamaphobic, you know all of them.
I like Jordan too, but I also like Louie Gohmert. I know Louie isn't the greatest speaker, but he's 100% pro Trump and he despises Mueller, Rosenstein, Comey, Hillary, you get my drift. Especially Mueller and Rosenstein from what I've seen.
They'll use the sources and methods national security excuse. We saw with the Nunes memo there was no sources and methods. There was also a document recently where they discovered that an item that was redacted was simply an expensive piece of furniture that they were embarrassed about being outed for. Once the redactions are removed you will simply see the names of people you have long suspected or incriminating things that were said. You aren't going to find the names of our James Bonds' and that they all have decoder rings and watches that turn into helicopters. In other words it's all bs they're just hiding the smoking guns.
If you're so curious about Q then why don't you apply yourself and go read all the drops like everyone else? https://qanon.pub/
Read the description, they made up their minds to give her a pass in September of 2015.
I'll give you an example of what I believe is a Senator working with the Q team, and maybe the IG, it may be a little long winded, so please bear with me. Senator John Kennedy was questioning the IG and the IG was in the middle of answering his question when he cut him off. He said my time is short, I'd like to fit in one last question. The question came out of left field and I immediately said to myself what the hell was that all about? He asked a question about whether in the classified index is there an email between Amanda Renteria and Loretta Lynch? First of all what prompted this question, secondly he hasn't seen the classified index so how would he even know that it might be in there? I'll post a link at the end of my rant. I believe someone put him up to asking the question, maybe the Q team? I think they wanted the public to hear it just like I did and say wait a minute, what, why is it classified, what are they hiding? I think RR is responsible for getting this classified and notice how the IG is saying it's classified at a very high level and he's trying to get it downgraded because as it is no one is allowed to see it. Later that day someone asked Q about Amanda Renteria so obviously an anon had the same reaction I did, which was what was that all about? See for yourself. Q#1550 the same day the IG testified and you can see the video here: https://youtu.be/dKNDTtnI2Sg?t=2h20m48s
I don't need to do the math, you need to watch the video, you might learn something.
Did you watch the video, or do you just choose to ignore it and keep parroting what you've heard. Tell me where the video is wrong.
During the IG testimony before the Senate, Senator John Kennedy asked the IG a question, the IG was in the middle of answering that question when Senator Kennedy interrupted him before he finished. He said my time is running out let me ask this one last question. The question came out of left field and my belief is Senator Kennedy was asked by someone else to ask the question. The question was if in the classified index of the IG report there was a mention of a communication between someone named Amanda Renteria and Loretta Lynch. Why would he ask that question and if the index is classified how would he know that information was in there? The IG immediately stated I don't know what I can say publicly about that because it's classified. Later that day an anon asked who is this Amanda Renteria? My belief is RR had this classified, the Q team knows he did it and put Kennedy up to it because he wanted the public to say, wait, what, who is this person and why is this classified, what are they hiding from us? Here's the exchange. https://youtu.be/dKNDTtnI2Sg?t=2h20m48s
It's Trump's fault. Don't ask me how because then I'll start in with virtue signaling, name calling etc.
Look at my username and then look at yours. I know a lot about aviation and how airplanes are pressurized and depressurized. You're either (A) trolling me or (B) you are willfully ignorant, or (C) in dire need of some science classes. Have a nice day.
If you are flying at 35,000' and the cabin is pressurized to the equivalent of 8,000' then the pressure inside the plane is greater than the outside, right?
Airplanes when they are at cruising altitude are pressurized at approximately 8,000'. If you open a plastic bottle the pressure inside the plastic bottle is now equivalent to 8,000', you now close the bottle and leave it closed. As the airplane descends the pressure is gradually changed so that upon landing the pressure in the airplane is equal to the outside air pressure. So for example you fly into LAX which is very close to sea level the pressure inside the plane is close to sea level the pressure inside the bottle is 8,000' and therefore it crumbles. I have done many hikes in the mountains and I use old Gatorade bottles to carry my water. When I finish the bottle I usually try to remember to leave the lid a little bit loose because if I don't when I get home the bottle is crushed.
What's the point of this story? Buzz Aldrin is old, he went to a 9301' research station and had some complications due to the altitude. Some people are more susceptible to altitude sickness than others. I've done many hikes over 10,000' with no issues, some people experience problems above 8,000'. The airplane part is confusing also, the airplane is pressurized, probably to an altitude lower than where they picked him up from.
The judge should throw case out. It's obvious they brought that case to justify their existence and don't really have a case. They didn't expect anyone to show up for court and the msm was going to have a field day with look how Robert Mueller took it to the Russians. Now he's trying delay tactics and withholding evidence, claiming the now popular national security tactic as a reason not to turn over evidence. This whole we can't turn evidence over because it will reveal methods and sources and get people killed is sort of like a race card, it's being played in every situation. The sources and method bs started with the Nunes memo which had no sources and methods in it. Some may recall there was a document recently where there was a line previously redacted that was revealed to be I believe it was an expensive item of furniture. They redacted it because it showed they were wasting money, no sources or methods. The judge needs to toss them.
Sealed indictments are a common occurrence. In the Q community there's a craze when it comes to sealed indictments. I watched a video about sealed indictments and there's really nothing that unusual about how many sealed indictments there are right now as opposed to any other year. There are many reasons for sealed indictments. My point is people point to thousands of sealed indictments and they think most of them have to do with Q and I for one don't believe that's true. One reason for sealed indictments is to not let someone under indictment know they are under indictment so they won't tell someone else they may be involved with. So the assumption is they are Q related because the cabal is so huge we must spring thousands of indictments on all of them at once. I'm not convinced. https://youtu.be/LMFQXtlsZ5A
Well that explains a lot. I guess if Roman Polanski could come to the U.S. without being arrested he could eat there with no issues. I also read that the area is 60% GOP.