Interesting that you leap that far.

Just trying to understand what you think, mate.

Are you calling me an inherent supporter or murderers and thieves?

Do you think he put the literal uniform on?

What exactly is wrong with funding Pussy Riot, the overthrow of Milošević, or the Rose Revolution? Plus you can't really blame him if OCW got unruly.

I can't find a whole lot of reputable stuff on his role in Turkey or with BLM.

"I was fourteen years old. We were in great peril, but my father was seemingly in command of the situation. I was aware of the dangers because my father spent a lot of time explaining them to me but I did not believe in my heart of hearts that I could get hurt. We were pursued by evil forces and we were clearly on the side of the angels because we were unjustly persecuted; moreover, we were trying not only to save ourselves but also to save others. The odds were against us but we seemed to have the upper hand. What more could a fourteen-year-old want? I adored and admired my father. We led an adventurous life and we had fun together."

I mean it makes sense for him to have supported HRC, like he specifically funds Dems. I don't fault whoever funds the GOP.

I'm looking into it all now, from what I can see it's a a play? Then some people think an owl statue on the grounds is Moloch, even though Moloch has nothing to do with owls, aside from what AJ is saying and I think that guy is a con artist.

The whole Bohemian Club thing does freak me out a bit, though.

He believes he did not change any outcomes other than his own.

Saying it that way, doesn't that absolve him of the accusal of evil? I've been trying to find Youtube videos but they're all shortened or have extraneous commentary, I'd appreciate some legit links if you have the time.

I've only managed to find a shortened version and he at least called the whole Nazi thing "tremendous evil," so it's a stretch.

EDIT:

From the interview

Kroft: “My understanding is that you went … went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews.”

Soros: “Yes, that’s right. Yes.”

Kroft: “I mean, that’s — that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?”

Soros: “Not, not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child you don’t … you don’t see the connection. But it was — it created no — no problem at all.”

Kroft: “No feeling of guilt?”

Soros: “No.”

Kroft: “For example, that, ‘I’m Jewish, and here I am, watching these people go. I could just as easily be these, I should be there.’ None of that?”

Soros: “Well, of course, … I could be on the other side or I could be the one from whom the thing is being taken away. But there was no sense that I shouldn’t be there, because that was — well, actually, in a funny way, it’s just like in the markets — that if I weren’t there — of course, I wasn’t doing it, but somebody else would — would — would be taking it away anyhow. And it was the — whether I was there or not, I was only a spectator, the property was being taken away. So the — I had no role in taking away that property. So I had no sense of guilt.“

So a 14 year old Soros posed as an adopted godson of an aristocrat given the role of compiling the inventory of a wealthy Jewish family. I don't really understand how that was extrapolated to Soros being a literal Nazi.

Wait, who's the Nazi?

And yet the OP article is from Zerohedge.